1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 55, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 55, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Estimates of depth, overpressure and amount of exhumation based on sonic data for a sedimentary formation rely on identification of a normal velocity–depth trend for the formation. Such trends describe how sonic velocity increases with depth in relatively homogeneous, brine‐saturated sedimentary formations as porosity is reduced during normal compaction (mechanical and chemical). Compaction is ‘normal’ when the fluid pressure is hydrostatic and the thickness of the overburden has not been reduced by exhumation. We suggest that normal porosity at the surface for a given lithology should be constrained by its critical porosity, i.e. the porosity limit above which a particular sediment exists only as a suspension. Consequently, normal velocity at the surface of unconsolidated sediments saturated with brine approaches the velocity of the sediment in suspension. Furthermore, porosity must approach zero at infinite depth, so the velocity approaches the matrix velocity of the rock and the velocity–depth gradient approaches zero. For sediments with initially good grain contact (when porosity is just below the critical porosity), the velocity gradient decreases with depth. By contrast, initially compliant sediments may have a maximum velocity gradient at some depth if we assume that porosity decreases exponentially with depth. We have used published velocity–porosity–depth relationships to formulate normal velocity–depth trends for consolidated sandstone with varying clay content and for marine shale dominated by smectite/illite. The first relationship is based on a modified Voigt trend (porosity scaled by critical porosity) and the second is based on a modified time‐average equation. Baselines for sandstone and shale in the North Sea agree with the established constraints and the shale trend can be applied to predict overpressure. A normal velocity–depth trend for a formation cannot be expressed from an arbitrary choice of mathematical functions and regression parameters, but should be considered as a physical model linked to the velocity–porosity transforms developed in rock physics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00607.x
2007-02-12
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00607.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AchesonC.H.1963. Time‐depth and velocity‐depth relations in western Canada. Geophysics28, 894–909.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al‐ChalabiM.1997a. Instantaneous slowness versus depth functions. Geophysics62, 270–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al‐ChalabiM.1997b. Time‐depth relationships for multilayer depth conversion. Geophysical Prospecting45, 715–720.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. AthyL.F.1930. Compaction and oil migration. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin14, 25–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BertelsenF.1980. Lithostratigraphy and depositional history of the Danish Triassic. Geological Survey of Denmark . Series B, 4. Geological Survey of Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BjørlykkeK. and EgebjergP.K.1993. Quartz cementation in sedimentary basins. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin77, 1538–1548.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BulatJ. and StokerS.J.1987. Uplift determination from interval velocity studies, UK, southern North Sea. In: Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe (eds J.Brooks and K. W.Glennie ), pp. 293–305. Graham & Trotman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ChapmanR.E.1983. Petroleum Geology . Elsevier. Science Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ChenQ. and NurA.1994. Critical concentration models for porous materials. In: Advances in Porous Media (ed. M. Y.Corapcioglu ), pp. 169–308. Elsevier. Science Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CorcoranD.V. and DoréA.G.2005. A review of techniques for the estimation of magnitude and timing of exhumation in offshore basins. Earth-Science Reviews72, 129–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CorcoranD.V. and MecklenburghR.2005. Exhumation of the Corrib gasfield, Slyne Basin, offshore Ireland. Petroleum Geoscience11, 239–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DvorkinJ., GutiérrezM.A. and NurA.2002. On the universality of diagenetic trends. The The Leading Edge21, 40–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DvorkinJ. and NurA.1996. Elasticity of high‐porosity sandstones – theory for two North Sea data sets. Geophysics61, 1363–1370.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. FabriciusI.L.2003. How burial diagenesis of chalk sediments controls sonic velocity and porosity. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin87, 1755–1778.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. FaustL.Y.1951. Seismic velocity as a function of depth and geologic time. Geophysics16, 192–206.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FengS. and SenP.N.1985. Geometrical model of conductive and dielectric properties of partially saturated rocks. Journal of Applied Physics58, 3236–3243.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. GreenbergM.L. and CastagnaJ.P.1992. Shear‐wave velocity estimation in porous rocks: Theoretical formulation, preliminary verification and applications. Geophysical Prospecting40, 195–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GuéguenY., ChelidzeT. and Le RavalecM.1997. Microstructures, percolation thresholds, and rock physical properties. Tectonophysics279 (1–4), 23–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. GuéguenY. and PalciauskasV.1994. Introduction to the Physics of Rocks . Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HanD.H., NurA. and MorganD.1986. Effects of porosity and clay content on wave velocities in sandstones. Geophysics51, 2093–2107.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HansenS.1996a. A compaction trend for Cretaceous and Tertiary shales on the Norwegian Shelf based on sonic transit times. Petroleum Geoscience2, 159–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HansenS.1996b. Quantification of net uplift and erosion on the Norwegian Shelf south of 66°N from sonic transit times of shale. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift76, 245–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HaskellN.A.1941. The relation between depth, lithology, and seismic wave velocity in Tertiary sandstones and shales. Geophysics6, 318–326.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. HeaslerH.P. and KharitonovaN.A.1996. Analysis of sonic well logs applied to erosion estimates in the Bighorn Basin. Wyoming. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin80, 630–646.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. HillisR.R.1995. Quantification of Tertiary exhumation in the United Kingdom southern North Sea using sonic velocity data. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin79, 130–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. HottmannC.E. and JohnsonR.K.1965. Estimation of formation pressures from log‐derived shale properties. Journal of Petroleum Technology17, 717–723.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. IsslerD.R.1992. A new approach to shale compaction and stratigraphic restoration, Beaufort‐Mackenzie Basin and Mackenzie Corridor, northern Canada. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin76, 1170–1189.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. JapsenP.1993. Influence of lithology and Neogene uplift on seismic velocities in Denmark; implications for depth conversion of maps. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin77, 194–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. JapsenP.1998. Regional velocity‐depth anomalies, North Sea Chalk. A record of overpressure and Neogene uplift and erosion. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin82, 2031–2074.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. JapsenP.1999. Overpressured Cenozoic shale mapped from velocity anomalies relative to a baseline for marine shale, North Sea. Petroleum Geoscience5, 321–336.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. JapsenP.2000. Investigation of multi‐phase erosion using reconstructed shale trends based on sonic data. Sole Pit axis, North Sea. Global and Planetary Change24, 189–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. JohnsonH., WarringtonG. and StokerS.J.1994. 6. Permian and Triassic of the southern North Sea. In: Lithostratigraphic Nomenclature of the UK North Sea (eds R. W. O'B. Knox and W. G.Cordey ). British Geological Survey.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. LanderR.H. and WalderhaugO.1999. Predicting porosity through simulating sandstone compaction and quartz cementation. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin83, 433–449.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. LiuG. and RoaldsetR.1994. A new decompaction model and its application to the northern North Sea. First Break12, 81–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. MagaraK.1976. Thickness of removed sedimentary rocks, paleopore pressure, and paleotemperature, southwestern part of Western Canada Basin. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin60, 554–565.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. MagaraK.1978. Compaction and Fluid Migration. Practical Petroleum Geology . Elsevier. Science Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. MackayL.M. and WhiteN.J.2006. Accurate estimates of the spatial pattern of denudation by inversion of stacking velocity data: An example from the British Isles. Geochemistry, Geophysics and Geosystems7, Q10007, 1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. MarionD., NurA., YinH. and HanD.1992. Compressional velocity and porosity in sand‐clay mixtures. Geophysics57, 554–563.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.1998. The Rock Physics Handbook . Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. MichelsenO.1989. Revision of the Jurassic lithostratigraphy of the Danish subbasin. Geological Survey of Denmark, Copenhagen .
  41. Nolen‐HoeksemaR.C.1993. Porosity and consolidation limits of sediments and Gassmann's elastic‐wave equation. Geophysical Research Letters20, 847–850.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. NurA., MarionD. and YinH.1991. Wave velocities in sediments. In: Shear Waves in Marine Sediments (ed. J. M.Hovem ), pp. 131–140. Kluwer. Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. NurA., MavkoG., DvorkinJ. and GalmundiD.1998. Critical porosity; a key to relating physical properties to porosity in rocks. The The Leading Edge17, 357–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. OlsenR.C.1979. Lithology. Well 17/10—1. NPD Paper 21.
  45. OsborneM.J. and SwarbrickR.E.1997. Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins. A Re–Evaluation. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin81, 1023–1041.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. PryorW.A.1973. Permeability‐porosity patterns and variations in some Holocene sand bodies. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin57, 162–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. RaymerL.L., HuntE.R. and GardnerJ.S.1980. An improved sonic transit time‐to‐porosity transform. Proceedings of SPWLA 21 Annual Logging Symposium, pp. 1–12.
  48. RolleF.1985. Late Cretaceous‐Tertiary sediments offshore central West Greenland: lithostratigraphy, sedimentary evolution, and petroleum potential. Canadian Journal of Earth Science22, 1001–1019.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. RubeyW.W. and HubbertM.K.1959. Role of fluid pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting, II. Geological Society America Bulletin70, 167–206.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. ScherbaumF.1982. Seismic velocities in sedimentary rocks; indicators of subsidence and uplift. Geologische Rundschau71, 519–536.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. ScholleP.A.1977. Chalk diagenesis and its relation to petroleum exploration; oil from chalks, a modern miracle?American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin61, 982–1009.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. SclaterJ.G. and ChristieP.A.F.1980. Continental stretching; an explanation of the post‐Mid‐Cretaceous subsidence of the central North Sea basin. Journal of Geophysical Research85, 3711–3739.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. SerraO.1986. Fundamentals of Well‐Log Interpretation . Elsevier. Science Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. SlotnickM.M.1936. On seismic computations, with applications, II. Geophysics1, 299–305.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. SmithT. and SondergeldC.H.2001. Examination of AVO response in the eastern deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Geophysics66, 1864–1876.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. SniederR., XieM.Y., PicaA. and TarantolaA.1989. Retrieving both the impedance contrast and background velocity. A global strategy for the seismic reflection problem. Geophysics54, 991–1000.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. TerzaghiK. and PeckR.P.1968. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice . John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. WalfordH.L. and WhiteN.J.2005. Constraining uplift and denudation of west African continental margin by inversion of stacking velocity data. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth110, B04403, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. WareP.D. and TurnerJ.P.2002. Sonic velocity analysis of the Tertiary denudation of the Irish Sea basin. In: Exhumation of the North Atlantic Margin: Timing, Mechanisms and Implications for Petroleum Exploration , 196 (eds A. G.Doré , J. A.Cartwright , M. S.Stoker , J. P.Turner , N.White ), pp. 355–370. Geological Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. WeaverC.E.1989. Clays, Muds and Shales . Elsevier. Science Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. WinthaegenP.L.A. and VerweijJ.M.2003. Estimating regional pore pressure distribution using 3D seismic velocities in the Dutch Central North Sea Graben. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 78–79, 203–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. WyllieM.R.J., GregoryA.R. and GardnerL.W.1956. Elastic wave velocities in heterogeneous and porous media. Geophysics21, 41–70.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00607.x
Loading
Constraints on velocity‐depth trends from rock physics models
Geophysical Prospecting 55, 135 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00607.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00607.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00607.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error