1887
Volume 57, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Results of a passive microtremor survey at an oil and gas field in Voitsdorf, Austria, are presented. The survey consists in six parallel profiles approximately 9 km long over two hydrocarbon reservoirs. For each profile the seismic wavefield was recorded synchronously at 11 in‐line stations. The measurements were conducted with broadband seismometers and lasted, for each profile, at least 12 hours overnight. Data interpretation is based on a comprehensive data set and on the analysis of four different spectral attributes. These attributes quantify the characteristic features of the wavefield's Fourier spectra in the low‐frequency range (<10Hz). One attribute quantifies the spectral energy in the vertical wavefield component, another attribute quantifies the maxima in vertical‐to‐horizontal spectral ratios and two attributes describe the frequency shifts of peaks within the spectra of vertical and horizontal wavefield components. Due to temporal variations of the signals we combine the long‐term measurements (several hours of continuous records) of multiple profiles. This procedure considerably enhances the consistency of each spectral attribute and makes them suitable to quantify lateral variations of the wavefield. The results show that using a combination of several attributes significantly increases the reliability of detecting anomalies in the microtremor wavefield that are presumably caused by hydrocarbon reservoirs. A numerical study of two‐dimensional seismic wave propagation is applied to investigate the peak frequency shift attributes. The results of the study indicate that the attributes may contain information on the depth of hydrocarbon reservoirs, assuming that the reservoir acts as a (secondary) source of low‐frequency seismic waves.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00734.x
2008-07-30
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.2002. Quantitative Seismology , 2nd edn. University Science Books. ISBN 0935702962.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AkrawiK. and BlochG.2006. Application of passive seismic (IPDS) surveys in Arabian Peninsula. EAGE Workshop Passive Seismic: Exploration and Monitoring Applications, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Expanded Abstracts, A28.
  3. Al YunchaZ., LuzonF., PosadasA., MartinJ., AlguacilG., AlmendrosJ. et al. The use of ambient seismic noise measurements for the estimation of surface soil effects: The Motril city case (Southern Spain). Pure and Applied Geophysics161, 1549–1559.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ArutyunovS.L., GrafovB.M. and SirotinskyY.V.1998. ANChAR ‐ an unique technology of direct hydrocarbon field exploration. Geoinformatics98, 12–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BardP.‐Y.1999. Microtremor measurements: A tool for site effect estimation? In: The Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion (eds K.Irikura , K.Kudo , K.Okada and T.Sasatami ), pp. 1251–1279. Balkema, Rotterdam , The Netherlands .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BirialtsevE.V., PlotnikovaI.N., KhabibulinI.R. and ShabalinN.Y.2006. The analysis of microseisms spectrum at prospecting of oil reservoir on Republic Tatarstan. EAGE/EAGO/SEG International Conference & Exhibition, Saint Petersburg, Russia, Expanded Abstracts .
  7. BohlenT. and SaengerE.H.2006. Accuracy of heterogeneous staggered‐grid finite‐difference modeling of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics71, T109–T115.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BourM., FouissacD., DominiqueP. and MartinC.1998. On the use of microtremor recordings in seismic microzonation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering17, 465–474.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CerjanC., KosloffD., KosloffR. and ReshefM.1985. A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations. Geophysics50, 705–708.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DangelS., SchaepmanM.E., StollE.P., CarnielR., BarzandjiO., RodeE.D. et al. 2003. Phenomenology of tremor‐like signals observed over hydrocarbon reservoirs. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research128, 135–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. FähD., KindF. and GiardiniD.2001. A theoretical investigation of average H/V ratios. Geophysical Journal International145, 535–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FähD., RüttenerE., NoackT. and KruspanP.1997. Microzonation of the city of Basel. Journal of Seismology1, 87–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. FrehnerM., SchmalholzS.M. and PodladchikovY.2007. Interaction of seismic background noise with oscillating pore fluids causes spectral modifications of passive seismic measurements at low frequencies. 77th SEG meeting, San Antonio, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1307–1311 .
  14. FrehnerM., SchmalholzS.M., SaengerE.H. and SteebH.2008. Comparison of finite difference and finite element methods for simulating two‐dimensional scattering of elastic waves. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors168. doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2008.07.003.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. FriedrichA., KrügerF. and KlingeK.1998. Ocean‐generated microseismic noise located with the Gräfenberg array. Journal of Seismology2, 47–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HolznerR., EschleP., ZürcherH., LambertM., GrafR., DangelS. et al. 2005. Applying microtremor analysis to identify hydrocarbon reservoirs. First Break23, 41–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ibs‐von SehtM. and WohlenbergJ.1999. Microtremor measurements used to map thickness of soft sediments. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America89, 250–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KorneevV.2007. Imaging of subsurface objects using resonant seismic emission. 77th SEG meeting, San Antonio, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts , 1113–1117.
  19. KorneevV.2008. Slow waves in fractures filled with viscous fluid. Geophysics73, N1–N7.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KouznetsovO.L., ChirkinI.A., DryaginV.P., Aroutunov, S.L. and MeltschoukB.Y.2005. Induced seismoacoustic emission – Basis for new seismic & acoustic methods of fluid identification. 67th EAGE meeting, Madrid, Spain, Expanded Abstracts, Z‐99 .
  21. LambertM., SchmalholzS.M., SaengerE.H. and PodladchikovY.Y.2007. Low‐frequency anomalies in spectral ratios of single station microtremor measurements: Observations across an oil and gas field in Austria. 77th SEG meeting, San Antonio, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts , 1352–1356.
  22. NakamuraY.1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Report30, 25–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. NogoshiM. and IgarashiT.1971. On the amplitude characteristics of microtremor (Part 2). Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan24, 26–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ParolaiS., RichwalskiS.M., MilkereitC. and FähD.2006. S‐wave velocity profiles for earthquake engineering purposes for the Cologne area (Germany). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering4, 65–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. PetersonJ.1993. Observations and modeling of background seismic noise. Open‐file report 93–322, U S Geological Survey, Albuquerque, USA .
  26. QuintalB., SchmalholzS.M., PodladchikovY.Y. and CarcioneJ.M.2007. Seismic low‐frequency anomalies in multiple reflections from thinly‐layered poroelastic reservoirs. 77th SEG meeting, San Antonio, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts , 1690–1695.
  27. RachedG.R.2006. Surface passive seismic in Kuwait. EAGE Workshop Passive Seismic: Exploration and Monitoring Applications, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Extended Abstracts, A27.
  28. RotenD., FähD., CornouC. and GiardiniD.2006. Two‐dimensional resonances in Alpine valleys identified from ambient vibration wavefields. Geophysical Journal International165, 889–905.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SachsenhoferR.F., GratzerR., TschelautW. and BechtelA.2006. Characterisation of non‐producible oil in Eocene reservoir sandstones (Bad Hall Nord field, Alpine Foreland Basin, Austria). Marine and Petroleum Geology23, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. SaengerE.H., GoldN. and ShapiroS.A.2000. Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite‐difference grid. Wave Motion31, 77–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. SaengerE.H., TorresA., RentschS., LambertM., SchmalholzS.M. and Mendez‐HernandezE.2007. A hydrocarbon microtremor survey over a gas field: Identification of seismic attributes. 77th SEG meeting, San Antonio, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts , 1277–1281.
  32. SteinerB., SaengerE.H. and SchmalholzS.M.2008. Time reverse modeling of low‐frequency microtremors: Application to hydrocarbon reservoir localization. Geophysical Research Letters35, L03307.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SuntsovA.E., AroutunovS.L., MekhninA.M. and MeltschoukB.Y.2006. Passive infra‐frequency microseismic technology ‐ experience and problems of practical use. EAGE Workshop Passive Seismic: Exploration and Monitoring Applications, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Expanded Abstracts, A25.
  34. Teves‐CostaP., MatiasL. and BardP.‐Y.1996. Seismic behavior estimation of thin alluvium layers using microtremor recordings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering15, 201–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. TuruntaevS.B., BurchikV.N. and TuruntaevD.S.2006. Microseismic background study for gas field exploration. 76th SEG meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, Expanded Abstracts , 115–119.
  36. VirieuxJ.1986. P‐SV‐wave propagation in heterogeneous media – Velocity‐stress finite‐difference method. Geophysics51, 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. YilmazO.1987. Seismic Data Processing, Volume 2 . SEG. ISBN 0931830400.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. ZhukovA.P., LoginovK.I., ShneersonM.B., ShulakovaV.E., KharisovR.G. and EkimenkoV.A.2007. Nonlinear properties of vibrator‐generated wavefields and their application to hydrocarbon detection. The Leading Edge26, 1395–1402.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00734.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00734.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error