Sensitivity and inversion of marine electromagnetic data in a vertically anisotropic stratified earth

References

1. AndersonW.L.1979. Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms of orders 0 and 1 by adaptive digital filtering. Geophysics44, 1287–1305.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AndréisD. and MacGregorL.2008. Controlled‐source electromagnetic sounding in shallow water: Principles and applications. Geophysics73, F21–F32.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BehrensJ.P.2005. The detection of electrical anisotropy in 35 Ma Pacific lithosphere: results from a marine controlled‐source electromagnetic survey and implications for hydration of the upper mantle . PhD thesis, University of California .
4. BoernerD.E.1992. Controlled source electromagnetic deep sounding: theory, results and correlation with natural source results. Surveys in Geophysics13, 435–488.
   [Google Scholar]
5. M.N.Nabighian
   ChaveA.D., ConstableS.C. and EdwardsR.N.1991. Electrical exploration methods for the seafloor. In: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics (ed. M.N.Nabighian ), pp. 931–966. SEG.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ChaveA.D. and CoxC.S.1982. Controlled electromagnetic sources for measuring electrical conductivity beneath the oceans: 1. forward problem and model study. Geophysics87, 5327–5338.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ClavaudJ.‐B.2008. Intrinsic electric anisotropy of shale: the effect of compaction. Petrophysics49, 243–260.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ConstableS.C., ParkerR.L. and ConstableC.G.1987. Occam's inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics52, 289–300.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ConstableS.C. and WeissC.J.2006. Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods: Insights from 1D modeling. Geophysics71, G43–G51.
   [Google Scholar]
10. EllisM.H., SinhaM.C. and ParrR.2009. Investigations into the discrepancies between electromagnetic and borehole derived resistivities in overburden sediment. 71st EAGE meeting, Amsterdam , the Netherlands , Expanded Abstracts.
11. EverettM.E. and ConstableS.C.1999. Electric dipole fields over an anisotropic seafloor: theory and application to the structure of 40 Ma Pacific Ocean lithosphere. Geophyscial Journal International136, 41–56.
    [Google Scholar]
12. HerwangerJ.V., PainC.C., BinleyA., de OliveiraC.R.E. and WorthingtonM.H.2004. Anisotropic resistivity tomography. Geophysical Journal International158, 409–425.
    [Google Scholar]
13. JingC., GreenK. and WillenD.2008. CSEM inversion: impact of anisotropy, data coverage, and initial models. 78th SEG meeting, Las Vegas , Nevada , USA , Expanded Abstracts.
14. JuppD.L.B. and VozoffK.1977. Resolving anisotropy in layered media by joint inversion. Geophysical Prospecting25, 460–470.
    [Google Scholar]
15. LøsethL.O., UrsinB. and AmundsenL.2007. On the effects of anisotropy in marine CSEM. 69th EAGE meeting, London , UK , Expanded Abstracts.
16. MacGillivrayP.R., OldenburgD.W., EllisR.G. and HabashyT.M.1994. Calculation of sensitivities for the frequency‐domain electromagnetic problem. Geophysical Journal International116, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MacGregorL.M., HarrisP.E. and WallsJ.2008. Reservoir characterization through joint interpretation of EM, seismic and well log data. Non‐Seismic Methods Workshop, Manama, ‘Bahrain, Expanded Abstracts.
18. MacGregorL. and SinhaM.2000. Use of marine controlled‐source electromagnetic sounding for sub‐basalt exploration. Geophysical Prospecting48, 1091–1106.
    [Google Scholar]
19. MacGregorL.M.1997. Electromagnetic investigation of the Reykjanes Ridge near 58° North . PhD thesis, University of Cambridge .
20. MailletR.1947. The fundamental equations of electrical prospecting. Geophysics12, 529–556.
    [Google Scholar]
21. MorseP.M. and FeshbachH.1953. Methods of Theoretical Physics, 10th edn. McGraw‐Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
22. PekJ. and SantosF.A.M.2006. Magnetotelluric inversion for anisotropic conductivities in layered media. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors158, 139–158.
    [Google Scholar]
23. A.Wirgin
    RamananjaonaC., LambertM., LesselierD. and ZolésioJ.‐P.2002. On the controlled evolution of level sets and like methods: the shape and constrast reconstruction. In: Acoustics, Mechanics and the Related Topics of Mathematical Analysis (ed. A.Wirgin ), pp. 243–250. World Scientific.
    [Google Scholar]
24. RamananjaonaC.J., AndréisD.L. and MacGregorL.M.2008. Characteristion of anisotropic resistivity from marine CSEM data. 70th EAGE meeting, Rome , Italy , Expanded Abstracts.
25. ShenC. and PlessixR.E.2009. Joint anisotropic inversion of MT and CSEM data using a multiplicative error functional. 71st EAGE meeting, Amsterdam , the Netherlands , Expanded Abstracts.
26. SimpsonF. and BahrK.2005. Practical Magnetotellurics . Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. TompkinsM.J., WeaverR. and MacGregorL.M.2004. Effects of vertical anisotropy on marine active source electromagnetic data and inversions. 66th EAGE meeting, Paris , France , Expanded Abstrcts.
28. UmE.S. and AlumbaughD.L.2007. On the physics of the marine controlled‐source electromagnetic method. Geophysics72, WA13–WA26.
    [Google Scholar]
29. WirginA.2004. The inverse crime. http://arxiv.org/abs/math‐ph/0401050.
30. ZhdanovM.S.2002. Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems , 1st edn. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]