1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 60, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 60 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Seismic waves propagate through the earth as a superposition of different wave modes. Seismic imaging in areas characterized by complex geology requires techniques based on accurate reconstruction of the seismic wavefields. A crucial component of the methods in this category, collectively known as wave‐equation migration, is the imaging condition that extracts information about the discontinuities of physical properties from the reconstructed wavefields at every location in space. Conventional acoustic migration techniques image a scalar wavefield representing the P‐wave mode, in contrast to elastic migration techniques, which image a vector wavefield representing both the P‐ and S‐waves. For elastic imaging, it is desirable that the reconstructed vector fields are decomposed into pure wave modes, such that the imaging condition produces interpretable images, characterizing, for example, PP or PS reflectivity. In anisotropic media, wave mode separation can be achieved by projection of the reconstructed vector fields on the polarization vectors characterizing various wave modes. For heterogeneous media, because polarization directions change with position, wave mode separation needs to be implemented using space‐domain filters. For transversely isotropic media with a tilted symmetry axis, the polarization vectors depend on the elastic material parameters, including the tilt angles. Using these parameters, we separate the wave modes by constructing nine filters corresponding to the nine Cartesian components of the three polarization directions at every grid point. Since the S polarization vectors in transverse isotropic media are not defined in the singular directions, e.g., along the symmetry axes, we construct these vectors by exploiting the orthogonality between the SV and SH polarization vectors, as well as their orthogonality with the P polarization vector. This procedure allows one to separate all three modes, with better preserved P‐wave amplitudes than S‐wave amplitudes. Realistic synthetic examples show that this wave mode separation is effective for both 2D and 3D models with strong heterogeneity and anisotropy.

© 2011 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00964.x
2011-06-23
2024-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00964.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. and RichardsP. 2002. Quantitative Seismology , 2nd edn. University Science Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AlkhalifahT. and SavaP. 2010. A transversely isotropic medium with a tilted symmetry axis normal to the reflector. Geophysics75, A19–A24.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BourgeoisA., BourgetM., LaillyP., PouletM., RicarteP. and VersteegR. 1991. The Marmousi experience. In: The Marmousi Experience, Proceedings of the 1990 EAEG Workshop, Marmousi, Model and Data (eds R.Versteeg and G.Grau ), pp. 5–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CharlesS., MitchellD.R., HoltR.A., LinJ. and MathewsonJ. 2008. Data‐driven tomographic velocity analysis in tilted transversely isotropic media: A 3D case history from the Canadian foothills. Geophysics73, VE261–VE268.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DellingerJ. 1991. Anisotropic seismic wave propagation . PhD thesis, Stanford University .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DellingerJ. and EtgenJ. 1990. Wave‐field separation in two‐dimensional anisotropic media (short note). Geophysics55, 914–919.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. FomelS. 2002. Applications of plane‐wave destruction filters. Geophysics67, 1946–1960.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FowlerP.J., DuX. and FletcherR.P. 2010. Coupled equations for reverse time migration in transversely isotropic media. Geophysics75, S11–S22.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GodfreyR.J. 1991. Imaging canadian foothills data. 61st SEG meeting, Houston , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 207–209.
  10. KiselevA.P. and TsvankinI. 1989. A method of comparison of exact and asymptotic wave field computations. Geophysical Journal International96, 253–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. StewartR.R., GaiserJ., BrownR.J. and LawtonD.C. 2003. Converted‐wave seismic exploration: Applications. Geophysics68, 40–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. SunR., McMechanG.A., HsiaoH. and ChowJ. 2004. Separating P‐ and S‐waves in prestack 3D elastic seismograms using divergence and curl. Geophysics69, 286–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ThomsenL. 1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. TsvankinI. 2005. Seismic Signatures and Analysis of Reflection Data in Anisotropic Media , 2nd edn. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Vavryc̆ukV. 1999. Properties of S‐waves near a kiss singularity: a comparison of exact and ray solutions. Geophysical Journal International138, 581–589.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. YanJ. and SavaP. 2008. Isotropic angle‐domain elastic reverse‐time migration. Geophysics73, S229–S239.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. YanJ. and SavaP. 2009. Elastic wave‐mode separation for VTI media. Geophysics74, WB19–WB32.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ZhangY. and ZhangH. 2009. A stable TTI reverse time migration and its implementation. 79th SEG meeting, Houston , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 2794–2798.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00964.x
Loading
Elastic wave mode separation for tilted transverse isotropy media
Geophysical Prospecting 60, 29 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00964.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00964.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00964.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anisotropy; Symmetry‐axis plane; Wave mode

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error