1887
Advances in Electromagnetic, Gravity and Magnetic Methods for Exploration
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The key to deriving a reliable quantitative interpretation from marine controlled‐source electromagnetic data is through the integration of shared earth modeling and robust 3D electromagnetic inversion. Subsurface uncertainty is minimized through efficient workflows that use all available subsurface data as a priori information and which permit multiple resistivity models to explain the same observed data. To this end, we present our implementation of an iterative migration method for controlled‐source electromagnetic data that is equivalent to rigorous 3D inversion. Our iterative migration method is based on the 3D integral equation method with inhomogeneous background conductivity and focusing regularization with a priori terms. We will show that focusing stabilizers recover more geologically realistic models with sharper resistivity contrasts and boundaries than traditional smooth stabilizers. Additionally, focusing stabilizers have better convergence properties than smooth stabilizers. Finally, inhomogeneous background information described as a priori resistivity models can improve the fidelity of the final models. Our method is implemented in a fully parallelized code. This makes it practical to run large‐scale 3D iterative migration on multicomponent, multifrequency and multiline controlled‐source electromagnetic surveys for 3D models with millions of cells. We present a suite of interpretations obtained from different iterative migration scenarios for a 3D controlled‐source electromagnetic feasibility study computed from a detailed model of stacked anticline structures and reservoir units of the Shtokman gasfield in the Russian sector of the Barents Sea.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00991.x
2011-08-01
2020-04-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CommerM. and NewmanG.A.2008. New advances in controlled source electromagnetic inversion. Geophysical Journal International172, 513–535. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2007.03663.x
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gazprom
    Gazprom . 2009. http://old.gazprom.ru/eng/articles/article21712.shtml (accessed 19 December 2009).
  3. GribenkoA. and ZhdanovM.S.2007. Rigorous 3D inversion of marine CSEM data based on the integral equation method. Geophysics72, WA73–WA84. doi: 10.1190/1.2435712
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HansenC.1998. Rank‐deficient and Discrete Ill‐posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion . SIAM Monographs on Mathematical Modeling and Computation, SIAM .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HesthammerJ., StefatosA., BoulaenkoM., FanavollS. and DanielsenJ.2010. CSEM performance in light of well results. The Leading Edge29, 34–41. doi: 10.1190/1.3284051
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MackieR., WattsM.D. and RodiW.2007. Joint 3D inversion of CSEM and MT data. 77th SEG meeting, San Antonio, Texas, USA , Expanded Abstracts, 574. doi:10.1190/1.2792486
  7. RamananjaonaC. and MacGregorL.M.2010. 2.5D anisotropic inversion of marine CSEM survey data – an example from West Africa. 72nd EAGE meeting, Rome, Italy , Expanded Abstracts.
  8. StørenT., ZachJ.J. and MaaøF.A.2008. Gradient calculations for 3D inversion of CSEM data using a fast finite‐difference time‐domain modeling code. 72nd EAGE meeting, Rome, Italy , Expanded Abstracts.
  9. TikhonovA.N. and ArseninY.V.1977. Solution of Ill‐posed Problems . Winston .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ZakharovY.V. and YunovA.Y.1994. Direction of exploration for hydrocarbons in Jurassic sediments on the Russian shelf of the Barents Sea. Geologiya Nefti i Gaza2, 13–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ZhdanovM.S.1988. Integral Transforms in Geophysics . Springer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ZhdanovM.S.2002. Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems . Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ZhdanovM.S.2009. Geophysical Electromagnetic Theory and Methods . Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ZhdanovM.S. and ČumaM.2009. Electromagnetic migration of marine CSEM data in areas with rough bathymetry. 79th SEG meeting, Houston, Texas, USA , Expanded Abstracts, 684. doi:10.1190/1.3255847
  15. ZhdanovM.S., GribenkoA. and ČumaM.2008. Regularized focusing inversion of marine CSEM data using minimum vertical support stabilizer. 78th SEG meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA , Expanded Abstracts, 597. doi:10.1190/1.2792487
  16. ZhdanovM.S., ČumaM. and UedaT.2010. 3D electromagnetic holographic imaging in active monitoring of sea‐bottom geoelectric structures. In: Active Geophysical Monitoring (eds J.Kasahara , V.Korneev and M.S.Zhdanov ), pp. 317–342. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ZhdanovM.S. and TolstayaE.2004. Minimum support nonlinear parameterization in the solution of 3D magnetotelluric inverse problem. Inverse Problems20, 937–952.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00991.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00991.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): CSEM , Electromagnetics , Inversion , Migration , Regularization and Stabilizer
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error