Seismic driven probabilistic classification of reservoir facies for static reservoir modelling: a case history in the Barents Sea

References

1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods . Vol . 1. W.H. Freeman and Co.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AvsethP., MukerjiT. and MavkoG.2005. Quantitative Seismic Interpretation . Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BachrachR., BellerM., Ching LiuC., PerdomoJ., ShelanderD., DuttaN. and BenabentosM.2004. Combining rock physics analysis, full waveform prestack inversion and high‐resolution seismic interpretation to map lithology units in deep water: A Gulf of Mexico case study. The Leading Edge 23, 378–383.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BackusG.E.1962. Long‐wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering. Journal of Geophysical Research 67, 4427–4440.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BoschM., MukerjiT. and GonzálezE.F.2010. Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: A review. Geophysics 74( 2 ), O1–O15.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BuiaM., CironeC., LeutscherJ., TarranS. and WebbB.2010. Multi‐azimuth 3D survey in the Barents Sea. First Break 28, 65–69.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BulandA., KolbjørnsenO., HaugeR., SkjævelandO. and DuffautK.2008. Bayesian lithology and fluid prediction from seismic prestack data. Geophysics 73 (3), C13–C21.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BulandA. and OmreH.2003. Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics 68 (1), 185–198.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ConnollyP. and KemperM.2007. Statistical uncertainty of seismic net pay estimations. The Leading Edge 26, 1284–1289.
   [Google Scholar]
10. ContrerasA., Torres‐VerdinC., KvienK., FasnachtT. and ChestersW.2005. AVA stochastic inversion of pre‐stack seismic data and well logs for 3D reservoir modeling. 67th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, F014.
11. DoyenP.2007. Seismic Reservoir Characterization . EAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
12. DubruleO.2003. Geostatistics for Seismic Data Integration in Earth Models . EAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
13. EidsvikJ., AvsethP., OmreH., MukerjiT. and MavkoG.2004. Stochastic reservoir characterization using prestack seismic data. Geophysics 69, 978–993.
    [Google Scholar]
14. GonzálezE.F., MukerjiT. and MavkoG.2008. Seismic inversion combining rock physics and multiple‐point geostatistics. Geophysics 73 (1), R11–R21.
    [Google Scholar]
15. GranaD. and Della RossaE.2010. Probabilistic petrophysical properties estimation integrating statistical rock physics with seismic inversion. Geophysics 75 (3), O21–O37.
    [Google Scholar]
16. GranaD. and DvorkinJ.2011. The link between seismic inversion, rock physics, and geostatistical simulations in seismic reservoir characterization studies. The Leading Edge 30, 54.
    [Google Scholar]
17. GunningJ. and GlinskyM.2007. Detection of reservoir quality using Bayesian seismic inversion. Geophysics 72 (3), R37–R49.
    [Google Scholar]
18. LakeL.W. and SrinivasanS.2004. Statistical scale‐up of reservoir properties: Concepts and applications. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering 44, 27–39.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LarsenA.L., UlvmoenM., OmreH. and BulandA.2006. Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction and simulation on the basis of a Markov‐chain prior model. Geophysics 71 (5), R69–R78.
    [Google Scholar]
20. MaffiolettiF., BardiniS., GranaD., PaparozziE., RuvoL., SalaC. and TarchianiC.2010. Changing scale and domain of a petrophysical and elastic properties based log‐facies classification. SEG Expanded Abstracts 29, 2406–2410.
    [Google Scholar]
21. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and Dvorkin, J.2009. The Rock Physics Handbook . Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. MerlettiG. and Torres‐VerdínC.2006. Accurate detection and spatial delineation of thin‐sand sedimentary sequences via joint stochastic inversion of well logs and 3D pre‐stack seismic amplitude data. Society of Petroleum Engineers 102444‐PA.
    [Google Scholar]
23. MukerjiT., JørstadA., AvsethP., MavkoG. and GranliJ.R.2001. Mapping lithofacies and pore‐fluid probabilities in a North Sea reservoir: Seismic inversions and statistical rock physics. Geophysics 66, 988–1001.
    [Google Scholar]
24. PirroneM., GranaD., MaffiolettiF. and D’AgostoC.2011. Monte Carlo Simulation and Uncertainty Evaluation of Log‐facies Classification Based on Petroelastic Properties. 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition.
25. SamsM.S., AtkinsD., SaidN., ParwitoE. and van RielP.1999. Stochastic inversion for high resolution reservoir characterisation in the Central Sumatra Basin. Society of Petroleum Engineers 57260.
    [Google Scholar]
26. SamsM.S., MillarI., SatriawanW., SaussusD. and BhattacharyyaS.2011. Integration of geology and geophysics through geostatistical inversion: A case study. First Break 29 (8), 47–56.
    [Google Scholar]
27. SamsM.S. and SaussusD.2010a. Comparison of lithology and net pay uncertainty between deterministic and geostatistical inversion workflows. First Break 28, 35–44.
    [Google Scholar]
28. SamsM.S. and SaussusD.2010b. Uncertainties in the quantitative interpretation of lithology probability volumes. The Leading Edge 29, 576–583.
    [Google Scholar]
29. SpikesK., MukerjiT., DvorkinJ. and MavkoG.2008. Probabilistic seismic inversion based on rock‐physics models. Geophysics 72 (5), R87–R97.
    [Google Scholar]
30. StrightL., BernhardtA., BoucherA. and MukerjiT.2009. Revisiting the use of seismic attributes as soft data for subseismic facies prediction: Proportion versus probabilities. The Leading Edge 28, 1460–1469.
    [Google Scholar]
31. UlvmoenM., OmreH. and BulandA.2010. Improved resolution in Bayesian lithology/fluid inversion from prestack seismic data and well observations: Part 2 – Real case study. Geophysics 75 (2), B73–B82.
    [Google Scholar]
32. WardJ.H.Jr. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of American Statistical Association 58, 236–244.
    [Google Scholar]