1887
Volume 37 Number 6
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Soil salinization limits agricultural productivity and can ultimately cause desertification and land abandonment. Traditionally soil salinity is assessed using soil sampling methods for laboratory determinations. These are not representative of soil properties at management scales and are highly time and work consuming, resulting in costly surveys. Recent research is revolutionizing how soil information can be obtained quickly and cheaply by using a state-of-the-art electromagnetic (EM) instrument and inversion techniques in conjunction with soil sampling results to generate high-resolution effective conductivity models and soil salinity maps. In this study, located in Leziria Grande, Portugal, an EM survey was performed at an experimental site to map the spatial variability of soil salinity. EM data were collected using an EM38 instrument deployed at different heights and orientations. The conductivity model obtained from joint inversion of EM data shows a high correlation with conductivity data from soil sampling. This has permitted the rapid development of a model of soil salinity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019019
2019-06-01
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AWRI
    [2010]. Measuring soil salinity. Vineyard Activity Guides,https://www.awri.com.au/wp-content/uploads/v_activity_soil_measure.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Davies, G., Huang, J., Monteiro Santos, F.A. and Triantafilis, J.
    [2015]. Modelling coastal salinity in quasi 2D and 3D using a DUALEM-421 and inversion software. Ground Water, 533.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Doolittle, J.A. and Brevik, E.C.
    [2014]. The use of electromagnetic induction techniques in soil studies. Geoderma, 223–225, 33–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. EEA
    [2017]. Global and European Sea Level. www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/sea-level-rise-5/assessment.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Farzamian, M., Monteiro Santos, F.A. and Khalil, M.A.
    [2015]. Application of EM38 and ERT methods in estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity in unsaturated soil. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 112, 175–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fischer, G., Nachtergaele, F., Prieler, S., van Velthuizen, H.T., Verelst, L., and Wiberg, D.
    [2008]. Global Agro-ecological Zones Assessment for Agriculture (GAEZ 2008). IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO, Rome, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Goff, A., Huang, J., Wong, V.N.L., Monteiro Santos, F.A., Wege, R. and Triantafilis, J.
    [2014]. Electromagnetic conductivity imaging of soil salinity in an estuarine-alluvial landscape, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 78 (5), 1686–1693.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, J., Monteiro Santos, F.A. and Triantafilis, J.
    [2016]. Mapping soil water dynamics and a moving wetting front by spatiotemporal inversion of electromagnetic induction data. Water Resources Research, 52, 9131–9145.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, J., Koganti, T., Monteiro Santos, F.A. and Triantafilis, J.
    [2017]. Mapping soil salinity and a fresh-water intrusion in three-dimensions using a quasi-3d joint-inversion of DUALEM-421S and EM34 data. Science of the Total Environment, 577, 395–404, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.224.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. International Organization for Standardization
    [2005]. ISO 10390:2005.
  11. Jing, Y.Z., Huang, J., Banks, R. and Triantafilis, J.
    [2017]. Scope to map soil management units at the district level from remotely sensed γ -ray spectrometry and proximal sensed EM induction data. Soil Use and Management, 33, 4, doi: 10.1111/sum.12359.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaufman, A.A. and Keller, G.V.
    [1983]. Frequency and transient soundings. Methods in Geochemistry and Geophysics, 16. Elsevier, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Oldenburg, D.W. and Li, Y.
    [1999]. Estimating depth of investigation in dc resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics, 64, 403–416.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Monteiro Santos, F.A., Triantafilis, J. and Bruzgulis, K.E.
    [2011]. A spatially constrained 1-d inversion algorithm for quasi-3D conductivity imaging: Application to DUALEM421 data collected in a riverine plain. Geophysics, 76, B43–B53.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Monteiro Santos, F.A., Triantafilis, J., Taylor, R., Holladay, S. and Bruzgulis, K.E.
    [2010]. Inversion of conductivity profiles from EM using full solution and a 1-D laterally constrained algorithm. Journal of Engineering and Environmental Geophysics, 15, 163–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Paz, C., Alcalá, F.J., Carvalho, J.M., and Ribeiro, L.
    [2017]. Current uses of ground penetrating radar in groundwater-dependent ecosystems research. Science of the Total Environment, 595, 868–885, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.210.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rodrigues, M., Fortunato, A.B. and Freire, P.
    [2016]. Salinity evolution in the Tagus estuary relative to climate change. 4as Jornadas de Engenharia Geográfica, Lisboa.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sasaki, Y.
    [2001]. Full 3-D inversion of electromagnetic data on PC. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 46, 45–54.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019019
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.2019019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error