Probabilistic forecasting for geosteering in fluvial successions using a generative adversarial network

References

1. Alyaev, S., Suter, E., Bratvold, R.B., Hong, A., Luo, X. and Fossum, K.
   [2019]. A decision support system for multi-target geosteering.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 183, 106381, 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alyaev, S., Shahriari, M., Pardo, D., Omella, A.J., Larsen, D.S., Jahani, N. and Suter, E.
   [2021]. Modeling extra-deep EM logs using a deep neural network.Geophysics (Just-Accepted Articles).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Antonsen, F., Teixeira De Oliveira, M.E., Petersen, S.A., Metcalfe, R.W., Hermanrud, K., Constable, M.V. and Nickel, M.
   [2018]. Geosteering in complex mature fields through integration of 3d multi-scale LWD-data, geomodels, surface and time-lapse seismic. In SPWLA 59th Annual Logging Symposium. OnePetro, 1–16.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S. and Bottou, L.
   [2017]. Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. In: International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 214–223.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chan, S. and Elsheikh, A. H.
   [2019]. Parametric generation of conditional geological realizations using generative neural networks.Computational Geosciences, 23(5), 925–952.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chen, Y. and Oliver, D. S.
   [2013]. Levenberg–Marquardt forms of the iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history matching and uncertainty quantification.Computational Geosciences, 17(4), 689–703.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chen, Y., Lorentzen, R. J. and Vefring, E.H.
   [2015]. Optimization of well trajectory under uncertainty for proactive geosteering.SPE Journal, 20(02), 368–383.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chen, Y., Luo, X. and Vefring, E.H.
   [2014]. On Bias Correction for Parameter Estimation Problems with Applications to Model Updating for Geosteering. In: ECMOR XIV-14th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery. EAGE, 1–19.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cole, R. D. and Cumella, S.P.
   [2005]. Sand-body architecture in the lower Williams Fork Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Coal Canyon, Colorado, with comparison to the Piceance Basin subsurface.The Mountain Geologis, 42, 85–107.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ellison, A.I.
    [2004]. Numerical modeling of heterogeneity within a fluvial point-bar deposit using outcrop and LIDAR data: Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin, Colorado.MSc thesis, University of Colorado. 1–225.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fossum, K., Alyaev, S., Tveranger, J. and Elsheikh, A.
    [2021]. Deep learning for prediction of complex geology ahead of drilling.Preprint accepted to LNCS, arXiv:2104.02550, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Goodfellow, I.J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville A. and Bengio, Y.
    [2014]. Generative adversarial networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.2661, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hermanrud, K., Antonsen, F., Teixeira De Oliveira, M.E., Petersen, S.A. and Constable, M.
    [2019]. Future Geosteering and Well Placement Solutions from an Operator Perspective. In: SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference. SPE, 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Larsen, D.S., Boesing, D., Hartmann, A., Martakov, S., Mumtaz, A. Skillings, J. and Vianna, A.
    [2018]. Boundary detection ahead of the bit - A sensitivity study of extra deep azimuthal resistivity. In Offshore Technology Conference Asia. OTC: 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Li, H. and Misra, S.
    [2017]. Prediction of subsurface NMR T2 distributions in a shale petroleum system using variational autoencoder-based neural networks.IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(12), 2395–2397.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Manouchehri, S., Pham, N., Hellem, T. A. and Roden, R.
    [2020]. A multi-disciplinary approach to establish a workflow for the application of machine learning for detailed reservoir description–Wisting case study.First Break, 38(7), 81–88.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Panjaitan, H.
    [2006]. Sand-body dimensions in outcrop and subsurface, lower Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin, Colorado.MS thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado. 1–170.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Pranter, M.J., Cole, R.D., Panjaitan, H. and Sommer, N.K.
    [2009]. Sandstone-body dimensions in a lower coastal-plain depositional setting: lower Williams Fork Formation, Coal Canyon, Piceance Basin, Colorado.AAPG bulletin, 93(10), 1379–1401.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pranter, M.J., and Sommer, N.K.
    [2011]. Static connectivity of fluvial sandstones in a lower coastal-plain setting: An example from the Upper Cretaceous lower Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin, Colorado.AAPG bulletin, 95(6), 899–923.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pranter, M.J., Hewlett, A.C., Cole, R.D., Wang, H. and Gilman, J.
    [2014]. Fluvial architecture and connectivity of the Williams Fork Formation: use of outcrop analogues for stratigraphic characterization and reservoir modelling.Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 387(1), 57–83.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Radford, A., Metz, L. and Chintala, S.
    [2016]. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. In: 4th International Conference on Learning Representations. ICLR, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Trampush, S.M., Hajek, E.A., Straub, K.M. and Chamberlin, E.P.
    [2017]. Identifying autogenic sedimentation in fluvial-deltaic stratigraphy: Evaluating the effect of outcrop-quality data on the compensation statistic.Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 122(1), 91–113.
    [Google Scholar]