1887
Volume 39 Number 8
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Although the seismic technique is becoming an increasingly popular tool for mining its use tends to be restricted to exploration. Although capable of being used to characterize active mining areas, this application has tended to be restricted to underground or deep open-pit mines as acquiring high-resolution data over extensive areas has previously been prohibitively expensive. In this paper we show examples of the impact of high-resolution survey parameters on the resulting processed datasets and describe how such datasets can be acquired in a cost-efficient manner leading to an extensive 3D seismic acquisition programme.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021059
2021-08-01
2021-09-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bagaini, C., Dean, T., Quigley, J. and Tite, G.-A.
    [2008]. Systems and methods for enhancing low-frequency content in Vibroseis acquisition.US Patent7,327,633.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cordsen, A., Galbraith, M. and Peirce, J.
    [2000]. Planning land 3-D seismic surveys. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dean, T.
    [2018]. Evaluating designs for shallow target 3D land seismic surveys. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dean, T., Quigley, J., MacDonald, S. and Readman, C.
    [2016]. The design of optimized broadband vibroseis sweeps.First Break, 39, 69–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dean, T., Tulett, J. and Barnwell, R.
    [2018]. Nodal land seismic acquisition: The next generation.First Break, 36, 47–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dean, T., Grant, M., Barnwell, R. and Barry, D.
    [2021]. A large-scale study of the reliability of land nodal seismic recording systems.First Break, 39, 69–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kallweit, R.S. and Wood, L.C.
    [1982]. The limits of resolution of zero-phase wavelets.Geophysics, 47, 1035–1046.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kragh, E., and Christie, P.
    [2002]. Seismic repeatability, normalized rms, and predictability.The Leading Edge, 21, 640–647.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Malehmir, A., Juhlin, C., Wijns, C., Urosevic, M., Valasti, P. and Koivisto, E.
    [2012]. 3D reflection seismic imaging for open-pit mine planning and deep exploration in the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, northern Finland.Geophysics, 77, WC95–WC108.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller, R.D., Ivanov, J., Peterie, S., Bailey, B. and Sloan, S.D.
    [2014]. Near surface seismic imaging: One size does not fit all.SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 183–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Quigley, J., Holmes, D. and O’Connell, K.
    [2013]. Putting it all together – broadband, high-density, point-receiver seismic in practice.75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Vermeer, G.J.O.
    [2012]. 3D seismic survey design 2nd edition. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021059
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021059
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error