Magnitudes for Induced Seismicity from Local Arrays: A Dutch Case Study

References

1. Bommer, J.J., Oates, S., Cepeda, J.M., Lindholm, C., Bird, J., Torres, R., Marroquín, G. and Rivas, J.
   [2006]. Control of hazard due to seismicity induced by a hot fractured rock geothermal project.Engineering Geology, 83, 287–306, doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.002.
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.002 [Google Scholar]
2. Butcher, A., Luckett, R., Verdon, J.P., Kendall, J-M., Baptie, B. and Wookey, J.
   [2017, 107] Local magnitude discrepancies for near-event receivers; implications for the UK traffic light scheme.Bull Seismol Soc Am:532–541.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Červený, V.
   [2001]. Seismic ray theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dost, B., van Eck, T. and Haak, H.
   [2004]. Scaling of peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity recorded in the Netherlands, Boll. Geof. Teor. Appl.45, 153–168.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dost, B., Ruigrok, E. and Spetzler, J.
   [2017]. Development of seismicity and probabilistic hazard assessment for the Groningen gas field.Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 96(5), S235–S245. doi:10.1017/njg.2017.20.
   https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2017.20 [Google Scholar]
6. Dost, B., Edwards, B. and Bommer, J.J.
   [2018]. The relationship between M and ML: A review and application to induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field, the Netherlands, Seismol. Res. Lett.89, 3, 1062–1074. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/02201700247.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dost, B., Edwards, B. and Bommer, J.J.
   [2019]. The Relationship between M and ML: A Review and Application to Induced Seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field, The Netherlands.Seismol. Res. Lett.90, 4, 1660–1662. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190062.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Eisner, L., Gei, D., Hallo, M., Opršal, I. and Ali, M.
   [2013]. The peak frequency of direct waves for microseismic events.Geophysics, 78(6), A45–A49. doi: 10.1190/geo2013‑0197.1.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0197.1 [Google Scholar]
9. Hanks, T.C. and Kanamori, H.
   [1979]. Moment magnitude scale, Journal of Geophysical Research84 (B5): 2348–50, doi:10.1029/JB084iB05p02348.
   https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB05p02348 [Google Scholar]
10. Kendall, J.-M., Butcher, A., Stork, A.L., Verdon, J.P., Luckett, R. and Baptie, B.J.
    [2019]. How big is a small earthquake? Challenges in determining microseismic magnitudes. First Break, 37:51–56.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Luckett, R., Ottemöller, L., Butcher, A. and Baptie, B.
    [2019]. Extending local magnitude ML to short distances.Geophysical Journal International, 216(2), 1145–1156.
    [Google Scholar]
12. NAM report
    NAM report [2017]. Technisch Addendum bij het MR Protocol2017.
    [Google Scholar]
13. NAM report
    NAM report [2019]. Seismisch risico voor ‘kleine velden’.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ntinalexis, M., Bommer, J.J., Ruigrok, E., Edwards, B., Pinho, R., Dost, B., Correia, A.A., Uilenreef, J., Stafford, P.J. and van Elk, J.
    [2019]. Ground-motion networks in the Groningen field: usability and consistency of surface recordings.J. Seismol.23, 1233–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09870-x.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Seister Report
    Seister Report [2019]. Analysis of consistency between B- and G-stations records for induced events in the Groningen gas field. Bijlage 1B.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Shearer, P.
    [2009]. Introduction to Seismology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Stork, A.L., Verdon, J.P and Kendall, J.-M.
    [2014]. The robustness of seismic moment and magnitudes estimated using spectral analysis, Geophysical Prospecting, 62, 862–878, doi: 10.1111/1365‑2478.12134.
    https://doi.org/10.111 1/1365-2478.12134 [Google Scholar]
18. TNO Report
    TNO Report [2019]. Dynamic amplification effects for B-stations due to building response. Bijlage 4A.
    [Google Scholar]