1887
Volume 40, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022030
2022-04-01
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barree, R.D., Barree, V.L., and Craig, D.P. [2009]. Holistic fracture diagnostics: consistent interpretation of prefrac injection tests using multiple analysis methods.SPE Productions & Operations, 24(3), 396–406.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ByerleeJ.D. [1978]. Friction of rock, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 116, 615–626.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Downie, R.C., Kronenberger, E. and Maxwell, S.C. [2010]. Using microseismic source parameters to evaluate the influence of faults on fracture treatments – a geophysical approach to interpretation.Society of Petroleum Engineers, Florence, Italy. SPE 134772.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Green, S. and Vernik, L. [2020]. Correcting density/sonic logs for total organic carbon to reduce uncertainty in pore pressure prediction.Geophysical Prospecting, 69(3), 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F. [1956]. Magnitude and energy of earthquakes.Annals of Geophysics, 9(1), 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hampton, J.C. and Boitnott, G.N. [2018]. The misnomer of ‘Effective Stress’ and its relation to Biot Coefficients.American Rock Mechanics Association, 52rd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Seattle, ARMA 18-1130, 10 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Higgins, S., Goodwin, S. Donald, A., Bratton, T. and Tracy, G. [2008]. Anisotropic stress models improve completion design in the Baxter Shale.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Denver, Colorado, USA. SPE 115736.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kamei, R., Nakata, N. and Lumley, D. [2015]. Introduction to microseismic source mechanisms.The Leading Edge, 34(8), 876–880.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lund Snee, J.-E. and Zoback, M.D. [2019]. State of Stress in North American Unconventional Oil and Gas Producing Basins. Proc.New Directions in Geosciences for Unconventional Resources (October 15–17, Banff, Canada), 7 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Maxwell, S.C., Jones, M., Parker, R., Miong, S., Leaney, S., Dorval, D., D’Amico, D., Logel, J., Anderson, E. and Hammermaster, K. [2009]. Fault activation during hydraulic fracturing.79th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts 28, 1552.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. McClure, M.W., Jung, H., Cramer, D.D. and Sharma, M.M. [2016]. The fracture-compliance method for picking closure pressure from diagnostic fracture-injection tests.SPE Journal, 21(4), 1321–1329, SPE 179725-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Shapiro, S.A. [2015]. Fluid-Induced Seismicity, Cambridge University Press, 276 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sinha, S., Marfurt, K.J., Devegowda, D., Pires de Lima, R. and S.Verma . Seismic inversion based SRV and reserves estimation for shale plays.Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition in San Antonio, Texas, USA. SPE-187137-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sone, H., and Zoback, M.D. [2014]. Viscous relaxation model for predicting least principal stress magnitudes in sedimentary rocks.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 124, 416–431.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Thiercelin, M., and Plumb, R. [1994]. A Core-Based Prediction of Lithologic Stress Contrasts in East Texas Formations.SPE Formation Evaluation, 9(4), 251–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Vernik, L. [2016]. Seismic petrophysics in quantitative interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Warpinski, N.R. and Smith, M.B. [1989]. Rock mechanics and fracture geometry in recent advances in hydraulic fracturing. In: Gidley, J.L. (Ed.) Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing. SPE Monograph vol. 12, 57–80. Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, SPE.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wessels, S.A., De La Pena, A., Kratz, M., Williams-Stroud, S. and Jbeili, T. [2011]. Identifying faults and fractures in unconventional reservoirs through microseismic monitoring.First Break, 29, 99–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Xu, S., Singh, A. and Zoback, M.D. [2019]. Variation of the least principal stress with depth and its effect on vertical hydraulic fracture propagation during multi-stage hydraulic fracturing.American Rock Mechanics Association, 53rd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, New York, ARMA 19-254, 7 p.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022030
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022030
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error