Machine Learning Assisted Seismic Interpretation: a Case Study of the Loppa High Area, Barents Sea

References

1. Indrevær, K., Gabrielsen, R.H. and Faleide, J.I. [2017]. Early Cretaceous synrift uplift and tectonic inversion in the Loppa High area, southwestern Barents Sea, Norwegian shelf.Journal of the Geological Society, 174(2), 242–254.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Indrevær, K., Gabrielsen, R.H. and Faleide, J.I. [2018]. Crustal-scale subsidence and uplift caused by metamorphic phase changes in the lower crust: a model for the evolution of the Loppa High area, SW Barents Sea from late Paleozoic to Present.Journal of the Geological Society, 175(3), 497–508.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Kairanov, B., Marín, D., Escalona, A. and Cardozo, N. [2019]. Growth and linkage of a basin-bounding fault system: Insights from the Early Cretaceous evolution of the northern Polhem Subplatform, SW Barents Sea.Journal of Structural Geology, 124, 182–196.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Lie, J., Danielsen, V., Dhelie, P.E., Sablon, R., Siliqi, R., Grubb, C., Vinje, V., Nilsen, C.I. and Soubaras, R. [2018]. A Novel Source-Over-Cable Solution to Address the Barents Sea Imaging Challenges, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ManralS. [2020]. Enhancing Fault Interpretation Efficiency and Accuracy with Deep Convolutional Neural Network and Elastic Cloud Compute.First EAGE Digitalization Conference and Exhibition, 2020. 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
6. MemariN., RamliA.R., SaripanM.I.B., MashohorS. and MoghbelM. [2017]. Supervised retinal vessel segmentationfrom color fundus images based on matched filtering and AdaBoost classifier.Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics: The Official Journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 55, 68–77.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., Berg, A. and Fei-Fei, L. [2015]. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge.International Journal of Computer Vision, 115, 211–252.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Smith, S., Zimina, S., Manral, S. and Nickel, M. [2022]. Machine-learning assisted interpretation: Integrated fault prediction and extraction case study from the Groningen gas field, Netherlands.Interpretation, 10(2), 17–30.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Tschannen, V., Delescluse, M., Ettrich, N. and Keuper, J. [2020]. Extracting horizon surfaces from 3D seismic data using deep learning.Geophysics, 85(3), 17–26.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Waldeland, A.U., Jensen, A. C., Gelius, L.J. and Solberg, A.H.S. [2018]. Convolutional neural networks for automated seismic interpretation.The Leading Edge, 37, 529–537.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Zimina, O., Hellem Boe, T., Manral, S. and Aare, V. [2022]. Machine Learning Assisted Seismic Horizon Interpretation Applied on the Groningen Gas Field, Netherlands.Second EAGE Digitalization Conference and Exhibition, Volume March 2022, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]