Using ‘Noise-Corrected OVT Fold’ to optimise land seismic acquisition risk, costs, and quality

References

1. Bakulin, A., Silvestrov, I. and Protasov, M. [2022]. Research Note: Signal-to-noise ratio computation for challenging land single-sensor seismic data; Geophysical Prospecting, 70(3), https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13178.
   [Google Scholar]
2. JuanUribe, RobertoParrado, LuisRodriguez, NestorSanabria, and PedroMunoz , (2016), “High-density 3D-nodal seismic acquisition in sub-Andean Mountains: An operational challenge,” SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 129–131. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13966044.1
   [Google Scholar]
3. Kuznetsov, I.V., [2006]. Outlook for Irregular System Implementation in Seismic Survey, 68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2006, 2214–4609; https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201402438.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Nakayama, S., Blacquiere, G., Ishiyama, T. and Ishikawa, S. [2019]. Blended acquisition design of irregular geometries towards faster, cheaper, safer and better seismic surveying, Geophysical Prospecting, 67(6), https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12701.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Stork, C. [2019]. “Global land seismic acquisition optimization by accounting for varying noise, obstacles, non-uniform placement costs, and signal,” SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2019-3216861.1.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Stork, C. [2020]. How does the thin near surface of the earth produce 10-100x times more noise on land seismic data than on marine data?; First Break, 38(8); https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020062.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Stork, C. [2021]. “Evidence that land seismic surface scattering noise can be treated as correctable signal distortion,” SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 2894–2898. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2021-3594531.1.
   [Google Scholar]