1887
Volume 42, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Managed peatland deterioration by microbial oxidation is a worldwide process that leads to the gradual disappearance of these highly organic and fertile soils. Peat oxidation is often the result of aerated top soils by artificially kept low groundwater levels, which enhances aerobic microbial breakdown of organic carbon. This process leads to both subsidence and large quantities of CO2 emissions. Furthermore, artificially drained peatlands are vulnerable to salinisation when proximal to coastlines, and fires when situated in dry and warm climatic zones.

The decrease of the soil moisture content (SMC) and groundwater level (GL) during drought episodes can cause both subsidence and accelerated CO2 emissions, both of which are big issues in the Netherlands. Severe drought results in salinisation of groundwater and greenhouse gas emissions by oxidising peat, and therefore is a societal burden to the Netherlands and worldwide. Furthermore, in coastal lowlands drought accelerates subsidence, leading to relative sea-level rise.

Both SMC and GL are proven to be mappable using geophysical methods. Multi-coil offset Electro-Magnetic Induction (EMI) has high potential to map peat properties for managed peatlands from apparent electrical conductivity (ECa). Studies show that by using EMI, it is possible to obtain ECa for different depth intervals, which are used to estimate soil organic carbon. Furthermore, EMI has a long application history of non-invasive SMC mapping, although obtained ECa also depends on other factors, such as variations in soil composition, density, and pore water conductivity (σ).

TNO and SoilMasters, an expert EM company, employ a mobile electromagnetic mapping system to recover the soil moisture content, a crucial ingredient in these issues. These innovative Electro Magnetic Induction (EMI) measurements of the soil moisture content are used in combination with geodetic and CO2 measurements to forecast subsidence and CO2 emissions.

We present a time-lapse pilot study for SMC and GL employing EMI in a managed peatland in the central peat-rich delta plain of the Netherlands, near the city of Gouda. Furthermore, we use soil moisture probe and GL measurements at fixed point locations to confront the obtained ECa. We also link the obtained calibrated soil moisture maps to observed subsidence, and CO2 NEE (Net Ecosystem Exchange) flux. The resulting highly correlated measurements and observations can be well explained by precipitation and drought patterns. This makes our findings good proxies for spatio-temporal prediction of subsidence and CO2 emissions for dry and wet spells by monitoring measurements of EMI.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024027
2024-03-01
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altdorff, D., Bechtold, M., van der Kruk, J., Vereecken, H. and Huisman, J.A. [2016]. Mapping peat layer properties with multi-coil offset electromagnetic induction and laser scanning elevation data.Geoderma, 261, 178–189
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Badewa, E., Unc, A., Cheema, M., Kavanagh, V., Galagedara, L. Soil [2018]. Moisture Mapping Using Multi-Frequency and Multi-Coil Electromagnetic Induction Sensors on Managed Podzols.Agronomy, 8, 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8100224.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boonman, J., Hefting, M.M., van Huissteden, C.J.A., van den Berg, M., van Huissteden, J., Erkens, G., Melman, R. and van der Velde, Y. [2022]. Cutting peatland CO2 emissions with water management practices, Biogeosciences19, 5707–5727. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5707-2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brevik, E., Fenton, C., Thomas, E. and Lazari, A. [2006]. Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping.Precision Agriculture, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-006-9021-x.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Comas, X. and Slater, L. [2004]. Low-frequency electrical properties of peat, Water Resour. Res., 40, W12414, doi:10.1029/2004WR003534.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003534 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dutch Hydrological Resources [2021]. http://www.grondwatertools.nl.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kechavarzi, C., Dawson, Q. and Leeds-Harrison, P.B. [2010]. Physical properties of low-lying agricultural peat soils in England.Geoderma, 154, 196–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Koster, K., Frumau, A., Stafleu, J., Dijkstra, J., Hensen, A., Velzeboer, I., Esteves Martins, J. and Zaadnoordijk, W.J. [2020]. GreenhousePeat: a model linking CO2 emissions from subsiding peatlands to changing groundwater levels.PIAHS382, 609–614.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. McNeill, J.D. [1980]. Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers:Geonics Ltd., Technical Note TN-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. NASA GRACE satellite data [2020], https://nasagrace.unl.edu/.
  11. Sluijter, R., Plieger, M., Van oldenborgh, G. J., Beersma, J. and De Vries, H. [2018]. De droogte van 2018, Een analyse op basis van het potentiële neerslagtekort, KNMI, De Bilt, 39 pp. (in Dutch).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Delefortrie, S., De Smedt, P., Saey, T., Van De Vijver, E. and Van Meirvenne, M. [2014]. An efficient calibration procedure for correction of drift in EMI survey data, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 110, 2014. 115–125, ISSN 0926-9851, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.09.004.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. De Smedt, P., Van Meirvenne, M., Davies, N.S., Bats, M., Saey, T., De Reu, J., Meerschman, E., Gelorini, V., Zwertvaegher, A., Antrop, M., Bourgeois, J., De Maeyer, P., Finke, P.A., Verniers, J. and Crombé, P. [2013]. A multidisciplinary approach to reconstructing Late Glacial and Early Holocene landscapes, Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(2), 1260–1267, ISSN 0305-4403, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.09.004.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Vereecken, H., Huisman, J.A., Pachepsky, Y., Montzka, C., van der Kruk, J., Bogena, H., Weihermüller, L., Herbst, M., Martinez, G. and Vanderborght, J. [2014]. On the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale, Journal of Hydrology, 516, 76–96, ISSN 0022–1694, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.061.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wait, J.R. [1962]. A Note on the Electromagnetic Response of a Stratified Earth:Geophysics, 27, 382–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wait, J.R. [1982]. Geo-electromagnetism: Academic Press Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024027
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024027
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error