Microseismic data interpretation — what do we need to measure first?

References

1. Baig, A., and T.I.Urbancic
   [2010]. Microseismic moment tensors: A path to understanding frac growth. The Leading Edge, 29 (3), 320–324, doi:10.1190/1.3353729.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3353729 [Google Scholar]
2. Eisner, L., S.Williams-Stroud, A.Hill, P.Duncan, and M.Thornton
   [2010]. Beyond the dots in the box: microseismicity-constrained fracture models for reservoir simulation. The Leading Edge, 29 (3), 326–333, doi: 10.1190/1.3353730.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3353730 [Google Scholar]
3. Grechka, V., and W.Heigl
   [2017]. Microseismic Monitoring. doi:10.1190/1.9781560803485.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560803485 [Google Scholar]
4. Grechka, V., ZhaoLi, BoHowell, and V.Vavrycuk
   [2016]. Single-well moment tensor inversion of tensile microseismic events. Geophysics, 81 (6), KS219–KS229, doi: 10.1190/geo2016‑0186.1.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0186.1 [Google Scholar]
5. GrechkaV., P.Mazumdar, S.A.Shapiro
   [2010]. Predicting permeability and gas production of hydraulically fractured tight sands from microseismic data. Geophysics, 75(1), B1–B10, doi: 10.1190/1.3278724.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3278724 [Google Scholar]
6. Hull, R.A., R.Meek, H.Bello, and D.Miller
   [2017]. Case History of DAS Fiber-Based Microseismic and Strain Data, Monitoring Horizontal Hydraulic Stimulations Using Various Tools to Highlight Physical Deformation Processes (Part A). Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Abstracts, 3050–3062.
   [Google Scholar]
7. JanskaE., L.Eisner, and I.Oprsal
   [2014]. Vector Fidelity of Downhole Receivers for Microseismic Monitoring Revisited. Fifth EAGE passive seismic workshop, Extended Abstracts, PSP18.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Karrenbach, M., A.Ridge, S.Cole, K.Boone, D.Kahn, J.Rich, K.Silver, and D.Langton
   [2017]. DAS Microseismic Monitoring and Integration with Strain Measurements in Hydraulic Fracture Profiling. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Abstracts, 1316–1330.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Klimes, L.
   [2012]. Sensitivity of seismic waves to structure. Stud. geophys. geod., 56, 483–520.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Rutledge, J.T. and W.S.Phillips
    [2003] Hydraulic stimulation of natural fractures as revealed by induced microearthquakes, Carthage Cotton Valley gas field, east Texas. Geophysics, 68 (2), 441–452, doi:10.1190/1.1567214.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1567214 [Google Scholar]
11. Rutledge, J.T., W.S.Phillips, and M.J.Mayerhofer
    [2004]. Faulting induced by forced fluid injection and fluid flow forced by faulting: An interpretation of hydraulic fracture microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley gas field, Texas. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am, 94, 1817–1830.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Rutledge, J.T., R.Downie, S.Maxwell, J.Drew, and T.Fischer
    [2013]. Extension-shear microseismic mechanisms during hydraulic fracturing. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 2067–2072. doi: 10.1190/segam2013‑1387.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-1387.1 [Google Scholar]
13. Staněk, F. and L.Eisner
    [2013]. New model explaining inverted source mechanisms of microseismic events induced by hydraulic fracturing. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 2201–2205, doi: 10.1190/segam2013‑0554.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-0554.1 [Google Scholar]
14. Staněk, F. and L.Eisner
    [2017]. Seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing in shales: A bedding plane slip model. Journal of GeophysicalResearch: Solid Earth, 122(10), 7912–7926, doi: 10.1002/2017JB014213
    https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014213 [Google Scholar]
15. Starr, J. and R.Jacobi
    [2017]. Simultaneous use of microseismic monitoring and DAS-strain measurements to analyze the anatomy of a hydraulic stimulation in the Marcellus Shale. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 2841–2845.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Warpinski, N.R., D.A.Northrop, R.A.Schmidt, W.C.Vollendorf, and S.J.Finley
    , [1981]. The Formation Interface Fracturing Experiment: An In Situ Investigation of Hydraulic Fracture Behavior Near a Material Property Interface. Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND81–0938.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Williams-Stroud, S., C.Ozgen, and R.L.Billingsley
    [2013]. Microseismicity-constrained discrete fracture network models for stimulated reservoir simulation. Geophysics, 78 (1), B37–B47, doi: 10.1190/geo2011‑0061.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0061.1 [Google Scholar]