1887
Volume 36 Number 12
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

During the last three decades Wolf and Pelissier-Combescure (1982), Delfiner et al. (1987), Baldwin et al. (1990), Wong et al. (1995), Helle et al. (2001), Bhatt and Helle (2002a,b), Dubois et al. (2007), Li and Anderson-Sprecher (2006), Zhang and Zhan (2017) have shown that neural networks such as multi-layer perceptrons (MLP) can be trained to infer lithology, sedimentary facies, porosity, and fluid saturation as functions of wireline logs. Machine Learning (ML) has been used to classify the seismic waveform (Anderson and Boyd 2004), solve AVO problems (Russell et al. 2002), and to segment seismic facies in 3D volumes (Meldahl et al., 2001; Zhao et al., 2015; Qi et al., 2016). Now, the next generation of ML techniques are transforming the subsurface workflow beyond these applications. This transformation is being enabled by multiple developments from outside the geoscience domain, namely:

  • Algorithmic development, driven by AI researchers and tech companies, has given us; i) convolutional neural networks (CNN) (leCun et al., 1990; Krizhevsky et al., 2012) that have transformed the quality of image classification and segmentation tasks, ii) recurrent neural networks (RNN, LSTM) (Hochreiter and Schmidhuber, 1997a,b; Graves et al., 2006; Graves 2013; Sutskever et al., 2014) that have dramatically improved sequence-to-sequence learning, and generative adversarial networks (GAN) (Goodfellow et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2017) which enable generation of realistic synthetic data and provide a powerful new class of architecture applicable to a wide range of problems.
  • Open source libraries such as scipy, tensorflow, pytorch, sklearn, as well as open source geoscience specific libraries such as gempy (de la Varga et al., 2018), and devito (Luporini et al., 2018) are emerging and facilitating application of ML in geoscience.
  • Increasing availability and democratization of sub-surface data in national data repositories (NDR) and other sources is enabling the geoscience community to experiment with novel data-analytics techniques, building data science into their problem-solving repertoire.
  • GPU enabled high-performance computing, and cloud computing and storage have given a wider audience access to the supercomputing needed to drive the often memory- and compute-hungry algorithms.
  • Emergence of data analytics platforms make the application of ML methods more practical for the generalist geoscientist who wants to focus on solving geoscience problems rather than writing bespoke code for each use case. Such platforms integrate data analytics with structured databases and enable users and organizations to apply ML on a large scale while maintaining order, data management, and provenance so that workflows are reproducible.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0145
2018-12-01
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/fb/36/12/Larsen_ST_FB_Dec_2018.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0145&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andersen, E. and Boyd, J.
    [2004]. Seismic waveform classification: techniques and benefits. CSEG Recorder, 29(3).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A. and Cipolla, R.
    (2015). Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1511.00561.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldwin, J.L., Bateman, R.M. and Wheatley, C.L.
    [1990]. Application of a neural network to the problem of mineral identification from well logs. The Log Analyst, 31(05).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatt, A. and Helle, H.B.
    [2002a]. Committee neural networks for porosity and permeability prediction from well logs. Geophysical Prospecting, 50(6), 645–660.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [2002b]. Determination of facies from well logs using modular neural networks. Petroleum Geoscience, 8(3), 217–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. de la Varga, M., Schaaf, A. and Wellmann, F.
    [2018]. GemPy 1.0: open-source stochastic geological modeling and inversion, doi:10.5194/gmd‑2018‑61, in review.
    https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-61 [Google Scholar]
  7. Delfiner, P., Peyret, O. and Serra, O.
    [1987]. Automatic determination of lithology from well logs. SPE formation evaluation, 2(03), 303–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubois, M.K., Bohling, G.C. and Chakrabarti, S.
    [2007]. Comparison of four approaches to a rock facies classification problem. Computers & Geosciences, 33(5), 599–617.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dupont, E., Zhang, T., Tilke, P., Liang, L. and Bailey, W.
    [2018]. Generating Realistic Geology Conditioned on Physical Measurements with Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1802.03065.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S. and Bengio, Y.
    [2014]. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2672–2680.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Graves, A., Fernández, S., Gomez, F. and Schmidhuber, J.
    [2006]. Connectionist temporal classification: labelling unsegmented sequence data with recurrent neural networks. 23rd international conference on Machine learning, 369–376. ACM.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Graves, A.
    [2013]. Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0850.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hanin, B.
    [2017]. Universal function approximation by deep neural nets with bounded width and relu activations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.02691
    [Google Scholar]
  14. He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollàr, P. and Girshick, R.
    [2017]. Mask r-cnn. In Computer Vision (ICCV), International Conference on Computer Vision. 2980–2988.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Helle, H.B., Bhatt, A. and Ursin, B.
    [2001]. Porosity and permeability prediction from wireline logs using artificial neural networks: a North Sea case study. Geophysical Prospecting, 49(4), 431–444.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J.
    [1997a]. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. [1997b]. LSTM can solve hard long time lag problems. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 473–479.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hornik, K.
    [1991]. Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural networks, 4(2), 251–257, doi:10.1016/0893‑6080(91)90009‑T.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T [Google Scholar]
  19. Kendall, A. and Gal, Y.
    [2017]. What uncertainties do we need in bayesian deep learning for computer vision?. Advances in neural information processing systems, 5574–5584.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. and Hinton, G.E.
    [2012]. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 1097–1105.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G.
    [2015]. Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, Y. and Anderson-Sprecher, R.
    [2006]. Facies identification from well logs: A comparison of discriminant analysis and naïve Bayes classifier. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 53(3-4), 149–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Long, J., Shelhamer, E. and Darrell, T.
    [2015]. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 3431–3440. arXiv:1411.4038.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Luporini, F., Lange, M., Louboutin, M., Kukreja, N., Hückelheim, J., Yount, C. and Herrmann, F. J.
    [2018]. Architecture and performance of Devito, a system for automated stencil computation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03032.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meldahl, P., Heggland, R., Bril, B. and de Groot, P.
    [2001]. Identifying faults and gas chimneys using multiattributes and neural networks. The Leading Edge, 20(5), 474–482.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A.A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M.G. and Petersen, S.
    [2015]. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mosser, L., Kimman, W., Dramsch, J., Purves, S., De la Fuente Briceño, A. and Ganssle, G.
    [2018a]. Rapid seismic domain transfer: Seismic velocity inversion and modeling using deep generative neural networks. 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mosser, L., Steventon, M., Oliveira, R.
    [2018b]. Probabilistic Seismic Facies Classification. Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1466917.
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1466917 [Google Scholar]
  29. Qi, J., Lin, T., Zhao, T., Li, F. and Marfurt, K.
    [2016]. Semisupervised multiattribute seismic facies analysis. Interpretation, 4(1), SB91–SB106.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Russell, B., Ross, C. and Lines, L.
    [2002]. Neural networks and AVO. The Leading Edge, 21(3), 268–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A. and Chen, Y.
    [2017]. Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature, 550(7676), 354–359.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O. and Le, Q.V.
    [2014]. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 3104–3112.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Waldeland, A.U., Jensen, A.C., Gelius, L.J. and Solberg, A.H.S.
    [2018]. Convolutional neural networks for automated seismic interpretation. The Leading Edge, 37(7), 529–537.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wolf, M. and Pelissier-Combescure, J.
    [1982]. FACIOLOG-automatic electrofacies determination. SPWLA 23rd Annual Logging Symposium, Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wong, P.M., Jian, F.X. and Taggart, I.J.
    [1995]. A critical comparison of neural networks and discriminant analysis in lithofacies, porosity and permeability predictions. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 18(2), 191–206.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, L. and Zhan, C.
    [2017]. Machine learning in rock facies classification: An application of XGBoost: International Geophysical Conference, Society of Exploration Geophysicists and Chinese Petroleum Society, Qingdao, China. 1371–1374.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhao, T., Jayaram, V., Roy, A. and Marfurt, K.J.
    [2015]. A comparison of classification techniques for seismic facies recognition. Interpretation, 3(4), SAE29–SAE58.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhu, J.Y., Park, T., Isola, P. and Efros, A.A.
    [2017]. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1703.10593.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0145
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0145
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error