- Home
- A-Z Publications
- First Break
- Previous Issues
- Volume 30, Issue 10, 2012
First Break - Volume 30, Issue 10, 2012
Volume 30, Issue 10, 2012
-
Could we have too much oil by the end of the decade?
By L. MaugeriIn his recent study ‘Global Oil Production is Surging: Implications for Prices, Geopolitics, and the Environment’ published by the Belfer Centre of Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, Leonardo Maugeri has challenged conventional thinking on worldwide oil resources and rate of depletion. In this edited version of the Executive Summary, he argues that oil production capacity is surging in the US and several other countries at such a rapid rate that global oil output capacity is likely to grow by nearly 20% by 2020 which could prompt a plunge or even a collapse in oil prices.
-
Analysis of a broadband processing technology applicable to conventional streamer data
Authors Z. Zhou, M. Cvetkovic, B. Xu and P. FontanaZhengzheng Zhou, Milos Cvetkovic, Bing Xu and Philip Fontana provide a case study to show that processing techniques can realize broadband marine seismic results from conventional streamer acquisition data without the need for the emerging built-for-purpose broadband streamer technology.
-
Seismic imaging with multi-layer tomography
Authors P. Guillaume, J.-P. Montel, S. Hollingworth, X. Zhang, A. Prescott, M. Reinier, R. Jupp, G. Lambaré, O. Pape and A. CavaliéPatrice Guillaume, Jean-Philippe Montel, Steve Hollingworth, Xiaoming Zhang, Anthony Prescott, Mathieu Reinier, Richard Jupp, Gilles Lambaré, Owen Pape and Alexandre Cavalié describe the application of multi-layer global tomography to improve the velocity inversion workflow in the modelling and imaging of seismic data.
-
Multi-dimensional high resolution processing to meet today's seismic imaging needs
By J.A. SteinJaime A. Stein discusses newly developed multi-dimensional high resolution algorithms that can benefit seismic data processing.
-
Acquisition and processing of large-offset seismic data: a case study from northwest China
Authors Y. Shixin, O. Yilmaz, W. Xishuang, Z. Yan, F. Mingtao, D. Shitai, X. Wendao and L. GangYan Shixin, Oz Yilmaz, Wang Xishuang, Zhang Yan, Fan Mingtao, Dong Shitai, Xie Wendao and Lin Gang describe the processing steps required to optimize the imaging of large-offset data acquired in the Yumen oil field northwest China and the benefits compared with a conventional 2D seismic survey approach.
-
Simultaneous time-lapse processing for improved repeatability
Authors X. Li., R. Couzens, J.P. Grossman and K. LazorkoXinxiang Li, Rodney Couzens, Jeff P. Grossman and Ken Lazorko present with a supporting case study a QC procedure for the simultaneous processing of multi-vintage time-lapse datasets which can improve the repeatability of the time-lapse data.
-
Statics solutions in seismic data processing: the next generation
Authors T.E. Galikeev, A.P. Zhukov and V.S. KozyrevT.E. Galikeev, A.P. Zhukov and V.S. Kozyrev present interactive statics technology (IST) as a method to refine the statics solution in seismic data processing, notable for not being dependent upon the exact velocity model, the velocity field, or the first breaks.
-
Reactive transport modelling applied to the prediction of the dolomitization distribution in carbonate hydrocarbon reservoirs
Authors P. Ronchi, A. Consonni, O. Borromeo, A. Battistelli and C. GeloniReactive transport modelling can be applied to dolomitization to test interpretations of the diagenetic process and to help predict the lateral extent of dolomite reservoirs. Here we report applications to four different cases of dolomitization. The first case simulates the compaction-driven flow model of a drowned palaeohigh and demonstrates that the main limiting constraint is the ratio between the volume of basinal fluids and the rock volume in the palaeohigh. In the second case, hydrothermal dolomitization was simulated in a shallow burial setting above deep-seated rift faults, and shows the importance fault geometry may have in constraining the geometry of the dolomitized body. In the third and fourth cases, two synsedimentary dolomitization processes, thermal convection and mesohaline reflux, were tested in modelling an isolated carbonate platform. Thermal convection produced a dolomitized wedge in the bank margin area, and reflux model simulation shows that some dolomitization can also be produced by mesohaline seawater influx from the top of the platform. In all cases, the simulations suggest that the hydrogeological system is the most important driver for dolomitization, and the final geometry of dolomite bodies is greatly affected by the permeability and the presence of fractures.
-
Shallow gas detection – why HRS, why 3D, why not HRS 3D?
By K.P. GamesDetection of shallow gas, and mitigation of this hazard while drilling, is the most significant and critical aspect of geohazard site surveys. Case studies show that the interpretation of shallow gas from seismic data, although well understood, is by no means unambiguous. In spite of the developments in acquisition and processing techniques over the last 20 years, which have improved the quality and interpretability of high resolution seismic data, the industry standard is still limited to the acquisition of 2D datasets. This paper compares the suitability of 2D and 3D exploration seismic data with high resolution seismic (HRS) data, and shows the advantages of better vertical and horizontal resolution that can be achieved with the use of HRS 3D data. Conventional 2D exploration seismic data are inadequate to identify shallow gas because of limited vertical resolution. In shallow water, the highest quality 3D exploration seismic data will not suffice either, because of the high angles of incidence for shallow reflection events. In deep water, 3D exploration data may be used for geohazard evaluation provided the dataset is of sufficient quality, but the best dataset for identification of shallow gas would always be an HRS 3D dataset.
-
Time-lapse seismic surveying: a multi-disciplinary tool for reservoir management on Snorre
Authors C. Fayemendy, P.I. Espedal, M. Andersen and M. LygrenToday reservoir monitoring is being used for increased oil recovery in about 75% of the fields operated by Statoil. The Snorre Field is a good example of how time-lapse seismic surveys help understanding and drive reservoir management. Even after more than 14 years of time-lapse seismic surveys, interpreting the 4D results is challenging due to the complexity of the reservoir and the drainage strategy. The time interval between seismic surveys is much larger than the water and gas injection cycles, and these variations in production operations between surveys make it difficult to reconstruct the reservoir history, including the inversion of the time-lapse data to estimate pressure and saturation changes. Using time-lapse seismic surveying as a tool to improve the static and dynamic models is important, but understanding the meaning of the 4D signal together with the uncertainties is critical. Here we describe how the asset works with the 4D data and show how time-lapse seismic data are used qualitatively.
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 41 (2023)
-
Volume 40 (2022)
-
Volume 39 (2021)
-
Volume 38 (2020)
-
Volume 37 (2019)
-
Volume 36 (2018)
-
Volume 35 (2017)
-
Volume 34 (2016)
-
Volume 33 (2015)
-
Volume 32 (2014)
-
Volume 31 (2013)
-
Volume 30 (2012)
-
Volume 29 (2011)
-
Volume 28 (2010)
-
Volume 27 (2009)
-
Volume 26 (2008)
-
Volume 25 (2007)
-
Volume 24 (2006)
-
Volume 23 (2005)
-
Volume 22 (2004)
-
Volume 21 (2003)
-
Volume 20 (2002)
-
Volume 19 (2001)
-
Volume 18 (2000)
-
Volume 17 (1999)
-
Volume 16 (1998)
-
Volume 15 (1997)
-
Volume 14 (1996)
-
Volume 13 (1995)
-
Volume 12 (1994)
-
Volume 11 (1993)
-
Volume 10 (1992)
-
Volume 9 (1991)
-
Volume 8 (1990)
-
Volume 7 (1989)
-
Volume 6 (1988)
-
Volume 5 (1987)
-
Volume 4 (1986)
-
Volume 3 (1985)
-
Volume 2 (1984)
-
Volume 1 (1983)
Most Read This Month
