1887

Abstract

Nearly half of the remaining petroleum reserves are contained in naturally fractured reservoirs (NFR). An accurate estimate of the effective fracture permeability tensor is a key to the successful prediction of oil recovery from NFR. Standard workflows nowadays employ discrete fracture network (DFN) modelling and analytical or flow-based methods to upscale fracture permeabilities. However, DFN modelling imposes some important challenges, which can cause great uncertainty in the effective permeability tensor and subsequent recovery prediction: Analytical upscaling methods, which are commonly used due to computational efficiency, are inaccurate for poorly connected fracture networks. Flow-based upscaling methods depend on boundary conditions and are computationally expensive. Defining the optimum grid size for either method is also very difficult. In addition, DFN upscaling is often driven by practical issues such as time constrains and computational limitations, leaving little room to investigate the effects of upscaling methods and grid size. In this paper we compare the performance of three different DFN simulators used in standard industry workflows for computing effective permeability tensors with flow-based and analytical methods. We use a dataset from a fractured formation of an on-shore reservoir in our assessment. Not surprisingly, there is up to three orders of magnitude variation in the effective permeability based on the chosen upscaling method and perceived optimum grid cell size. Quality control with streamline calculations provides no robust assessment of the best upscaling method. We hence introduce a new simulation technique, Discrete Fracture and Matrix (DFM) modelling, which accounts accurately for flow in the fractures and rock matrix as a robust. It is an efficient alternative for computing effective permeability tensors or assessing the accuracy of classical DFN upscaling approaches, which all help reducing uncertainty in recovery prediction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.293.H010
2012-06-04
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.293.H010
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error