1887

Abstract

Summary

In recent years the elastic full waveform inversion (FWI) was successfully applied to synthetic and field data to compute high resolution velocity models. While seismic velocities are derived from recorded phase information, density models can be estimated from the amplitudes. However, due to the complexity of the inverse problem a long wavelength initial model is required for a good reconstruction of the density. The inclusion of gravity data into the FWI concept can solve this problem.

In this study a two-step hierarchic joint inversion of seismic waveforms and gravity data is tested using the Marmousi-II model. In step 1 FWI is performed for all elastic parameters. Gaussian filtered velocity models of the true model and a constant halfspace density model (CDH) are used as initial models. While the velocities can be reconstructed well, the density shows large deviations from the true model. In step 2 joint inversion is applied to optimize only the density model, while the velocity inversion results of the first step and the CDH are used as initial models. The results of this combined approach show a significant improvement of the density model compared to the results of a pure FWI.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413407
2015-06-01
2020-08-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brossier, R.
    [2011] Two-dimensional frequency-domain visco-elastic full waveform inversion: Parallel algorithms, optimization and performance. Computers & Geosciences, 37(4), 444 – 455.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Choi, Y., Min, D. and Shin, C.
    [2008] Frequency-domain elastic full waveform inversion using the new pseudo-hessian matrix: Experience of elastic marmousi-2 synthetic data. Bull., Seis Soc. Am., 98, 2402–2415.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dokter, E., Köhn, D., Wilken, D. and Rabbel, W.
    [2014] Application of elastic 2D waveform inversion to a near surface SH-wave dataset. 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014, Amsterdam, WE P01 12.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jeong, W., Lee, H.Y. and Min, D.J.
    [2012] Full waveform inversion strategy for density in the frequency domain. Geophysical Journal International, 188(3), 1221–1242.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Köhn, D., De Nil, D., Kurzmann, A., Przebindowska, A. and Bohlen, T.
    [2012] On the influence of model parametrization in elastic full waveform tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 191(1), 325–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Martin, G., Wiley, R. and Marfurt, K.
    [2006] Marmousi2 – An elastic upgrade for Marmousi. The Leading Edge, 25, 156–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.
    [2006] Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Operto, S.et al.
    [2013] A guided tour of multiparameter full-waveform inversion with multicomponent data: From theory to practice. The Leading Edge, 32(9), 1040–1054.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Plessix, R.E. and Mulder, W.A.
    [2004] Frequency-domain finite-difference amplitude-preserving migration. Geophysical Journal International, 157(3), 975–987.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Prieux, V., Lambaré, G., Operto, S. and Virieux, J.
    [2013] Building starting models for full waveform inversion from wide-aperture data by stereotomography. Geophysical Prospecting, 61, 109–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Shin, C. and Ha, W.
    [2008] A comparison between the behavior of objective functions for waveform inversion in the frequency and Laplace domains. Geophysics, 73(5), VE119–VE133.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Shin, C.et al.
    [2001] Efficient calculation of a partial-derivative wavefield using reciprocity for seismic imaging and inversion. Geophysics, 6, 1856–1863.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Versteeg, R.
    [1994] The marmousi experience: Velocity model determination on a complex data set. The Leading Edge, 13, 927–936.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu, K. and McMechan, G.
    [2014] 2D frequency-domain elastic full-waveform inversion using time-domain modeling and a multistep-length gradient approach. Geophysics, 79(2), R41–R53.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413407
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413407
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error