1887

Abstract

Summary

Recent case study examples have demonstrated how imaging with multiples could extend imaging with primaries, providing processing solutions in cases of insufficient illumination of targets by primaries. While imaging all multiples as signal would provide the largest increase in illumination with respect to imaging primaries only, it would suffer also the most from cross-talk noise generated during imaging.

Here we discuss properties of processing methods (as opposed to inversion methods) that use selected subsets of multiples to achieve fit-for-purpose objectives in extending images from primaries. We illustrate these methods with examples using 3D streamer data in a test area with water depths ranging from shallow to deep. We note that source-side multiples contribute effectively to fill gaps between source lines, while receiver-side multiples contribute to increased resolution (reduced near offset gap) and broader range of angles available for analysis of shallow targets. We customize our pre-processing of the data and our imaging methods for selected subsets of multiples thus minimizing crosstalk noise. We discuss an example application of shallow imaging providing input to better attenuation of multiples and conditioning of data for imaging of deep targets.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801067
2018-06-11
2020-07-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A. J., and Verschuur, D. J.
    [1994] Multiples technology: Part 2, Migration of multiple reflections. 64th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1497–1500.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2003] Transformation of multiples into primary reflections. 73rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1925–1928.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Claerbout, J. F.
    [1985] Imaging the Earth’s Interior. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Inc.Cambridge, MA, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Guitton, A.
    [2002] Shot-profile migration of multiple reflections. 72nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1296–1299.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lu, S. Whitmore, N., Valenciano, A. A., and Chemingui, N.
    [2011] Imaging of primaries and multiples with the 3D SEAM synthetic. 81st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts3271–3221.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lu, S., Whitmore, D.N., Valenciano, A. A., and Chemingui, N.
    [2015] Separated-wavefield imaging using primary and multiple energy. The Leading Edge, 34, 770–778.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ong, C., Lapilli, C., Perdomo, J. P., and Coates, R.
    [2013] Extended imaging and illumination in wave migrations. 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts 2013, 4116–4120.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Verschuur, D. J.
    [2006] Seismic multiples removal techniques. In Education Tour series. EAGE Publications bv.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Verschuur, D. J., and Berkhout, A. J.
    , [2015] Can multiples relieve the acquisition requirements?85th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4806–4811.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhiping, Y., Jeshurun, H., Chen, H., and Yang, J.
    [2015] Reverse time migration of multiples: Applications and challenges. The Leading Edge34, 780–786.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801067
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801067
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error