1887

Abstract

Summary

Resistivity surveys are now also carried in areas covered by water. The surveys involve electrodes planted on the water bottom or on a streamer towed by a boat. As the water layer has a large effect on resistivity measurements, its effect must be accurately modelled. The water resistivity and depth to the bottom are usually independently measured with a conductivity meter and depth sounder. The upper part of a finite-element grid is used to model the water layer, including possible variations in the water resistivity with depth. We show the results from a 2-D survey in Stockholm with electrodes planted on the sea bottom. The sediment thickness from the inverse model agrees well with drilling results and a possible weak zone in the bedrock was detected. Surveys with floating electrodes do not follow a straight line due to water currents and a 3-D inversion approach is required. An example is shown from a survey in the Panama Canal where the data from 19 sub-parallel lines are collated into a 3-D data set. The inverse model shows a conductive bottom with weathered marine sedimentary rocks and a remnant of an old river channel filled with more resistive sands and gravels.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900401
2019-04-24
2020-04-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AcworthR.I and DaseyG.R.
    , 2003. Mapping of the hyporheic zone around a tidal creek using a combination of borehole logging, borehole electrical tomography and cross-creek electrical imaging, New South Wales, Australia. Hydrogeology Journal, 11, 368–377.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DahlinT. and LokeM.H.
    , 2018. Underwater ERT surveying in water with resistivity layering with example of application to site investigation for a rock tunnel in central Stockholm. Near Surface Geophysics, 16, 230–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. deGroot-HedlinC. and ConstableS.
    , 1990. Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models form magnetotelluric data. Geophysics, 55, 1613–1624.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FarquharsonC.G. and OldenburgD.W.
    1998. Nonlinear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure. Geophysical Journal International, 134, 213–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LokeM.H., AcworthI. and DahlinT.
    , 2003. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics, 34, 182–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LokeM.H. and LaneJ.W.
    2004. Inversion of data from electrical resistivity imaging surveys in water-covered areas. Exploration Geophysics, 35, 266–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LokeM.H., ChambersJ.E., RuckerD.F., KurasO. and WilkinsonP.B.
    2013. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of Applied Geophysics95, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MaurerH.R. and FriedelS.
    , 2006. Outer space sensitivities in geoelectrical tomography. Geophysics, 71, G93–G96.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. RinaldiV., GuichonM., FerreroV., SerranoC. and PontiN.
    2006. Resistivity survey of the subsurface conditions in the estuary of the Rio de la Plata. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132, 72–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rucker, D.F., NoonanG.E., and GreenwoodW.J.
    , 2011. Electrical resistivity in support of geologic mapping along the Panama Canal. Engineering Geology, 117, 121–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. RuckerD.F. and NoonanG.E.
    , 2013. Using marine resistivity to map geotechnical properties: a case study in support of dredging the Panama Canal. Near Surface Geophysics, 11, 625–637.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. SimyrdanisK., PapadopoulosN., KimJ.H., TsourlosP., and MoffatI.
    , 2015. Archaeological Investigations in the Shallow Seawater Environment with Electrical Resistivity Tomography. Journal of Near Surface Geophysics, Integrated geophysical Investigations for Archaeology. 13, 601- 611.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900401
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900401
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error