1887

Abstract

Summary

High-resolution Radon transform (RT) has been widely developed and used in seismic data processing. However, the sparse representation and perfect data reconstruction cannot be satisfied simultaneously because only the adjoint operator is adopted in the previous proposed inversion-based Radon transform methods. To address this problem, we use a series of generalized atoms (defined by amplitude, traveltime and wavelet) to approximately construct the pseudo-inverse of the adjoint operator based on the separation of amplitude and traveltime. The unknown atoms are constructed by two steps: location and calibration. The location step is based on a greedy algorithm which can select the atom that best explain the input data (residual); and the (amplitude) calibration step is to ensure that the selected atom can approximate the data more accurate. By iteratively applying the location and calibration steps, the locally coherent events in seismic data can be sparsely approximated. Meanwhile, the reconstruction quality is dramatically improved due to the introduction of pseudo-inverse operator. The proposed algorithm is very efficient because no SVD or over-complete system is required. Numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed method is robust to random noises.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901198
2019-06-03
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Lambaré, G.
    , 2008, Stereotomography: Geophysics, 73(5), VE25–VE34.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Trad, D., T.Ulrych, and M.Sacchi
    , 2003, Latest views of the sparse Radon transform: Geophysics, 68, 386–399.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, X. and H.Wang
    , 2014, A research of high-resolution plane-wave docomposition based on comressed sensing: Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57(9), 2946–2960. (in Chinese).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Xu, W., Feng, B, Wang, H. et al.
    , 2016, Compressed sensing based sparse pseudo-orthogonal Radon transform, 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, We STZ1 15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Latif, A., W. A.Mousa, and K.Fahd
    , 2015, Efficient under-sampled high resolution Radon transform. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015, 4574–4579.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Elad, M., and M.Ahron
    , 2006, Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned distionaries: IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 54(12), 3736–3745.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cai, J., H.Ji, Z.Shen, et al.
    , 2014, Data-driven tight frame construction and image denoising: Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 37, 89–105
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu, S., J.Ma, and S.Osher
    , 2016, Monte Carlo data-driven tight frame for seismic data recovery: Geophysics, 81(4), V327–V340.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901198
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901198
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error