1887

Abstract

Summary

Detecting and imaging microseismic activity can be a powerful tool for reservoir monitoring, it can help in detecting and quantifying regional tectonic and production related stress buildup. However, identifying microseismic activities from individual traces/raw data is not an easy task because of their low signal-to-noise ratio. Also, the presence of numerous microseismic event locations (for example during water injection or hydraulic fracturing) can lead to erroneous identification of spurious noise as a microseismic event. In order to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, a Kirchhoff-migration style stacking is used, where the amplitude of the event in the stacked trace gets enhanced due to constructive interferrence. To avoid the erroneous detection of these events, an Iterative Clustering based Segmentation (ICS) approach (unsupervised machine learning technique) is used. The technique is correctly able to identify the clusters of microseismic event locations in space (3D cubes/splices) at a particular instant of time for both synthetic as well as real data. The cluster identification is carried out on 3D cubes (only space) rather than 4D (space and time altogether) because of the mobile nature of the event locations, which can also be monitored using the ICS scheme.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901506
2019-06-03
2020-05-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arthur, D. and Vassilvitskii, S.
    [2007] k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. In: SODA '07 Proc. Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms. 1027–1035.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gupta, D.K, Shrivastava, R.K, Phadke, S. and Goudswaard, J.
    [2019] Unsupervised Automated Event Detection using an Iterative Clustering based Segmentation Approach. arXiv preprint.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kao, H. and Shan, S.J
    [2004] The source-scanning algorithm: Mapping the distribution of seismic sources in time and space. Geophysical Journal International, 157(2), 589–594.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MacQueen, J.
    [1967] Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proc. Fifth Symp. Math. Statist. Prob., 1. 281–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rentsch, S., Buske, S., Lüth, S. and Shapiro, A.
    [2006] Fast location of seismicity: A migration-type approach with application to hydraulic-fracturing data. Geophysics, 72(1), S33–S40.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901506
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901506
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error