1887

Abstract

Summary

This study demonstrates how the capacitive resistivity imaging (CRI) technique can be used at the laboratory scale to derive a spatially resolved 3D model of water content in a core sample of Higher Strength Rock (HSR). Understanding groundwater flow and the transport and retardation of any radionuclides in fractured HSR is a key research aim associated with the geological disposal of radioactive waste. Retardation and incorporation of radionuclides from groundwater into the surrounding rock mass is important for the safety case for a geological disposal facility (GDF) in HSR. For a rock with dual porosity, such retardation and incorporation may be enhanced if the radionuclides are able to diffuse from fractures that support advection into effectively stagnant porewater within the rock matrix. This diffusion is termed Rock Matrix Diffusion (RMD). Improved non-destructive estimation and spatial mapping of water content in HSR under “fresh rock” conditions may offer new insights in RMD research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902438
2019-09-08
2020-07-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. O.Kuras, D.Beamish, P.I.Meldrum and R.D.Ogilvy
    2006. Fundamentals of the capacitive resistivity technique. Geophysics71, G135–G152. doi:10.1190/1.2194892
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2194892 [Google Scholar]
  2. G.V.Keller and F.C.Frischknecht
    1966. Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. T.C.Johnson, R.J.Versteeg, A.Ward, F.D.Day-Lewis and A.Revil
    2010. Improved hydrogeophysical characterization and monitoring through parallel modeling and inversion of time-domain resistivity and induced-polarization data. Geophysics75, Wa27–Wa41. doi: 10.1190/1.3475513
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3475513 [Google Scholar]
  4. J.B.Murton, O.Kuras, M.Krautblatter, T.Cane, D.Tschofen, S.Uhlemann, S.Schober and P.Watson
    2016. Monitoring rock freezing and thawing by novel geoelectrical and acoustic techniques. Journal of Geophysical Research-Earth Surface121, 2309–2332. doi:10.1002/2016jf003948
    https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jf003948 [Google Scholar]
  5. E.I.Parkhomenko
    1967. Electrical Properties of Rocks. Plenum Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. M.Schneebeli, H.Fluhler, T.Gimmi, H.Wydler, H.P.Laser and T.Baer
    1995. Measurements of Water Potential and Water-Content in Unsaturated Crystalline Rock. Water Resources Research31, 1837–1843. doi:10.1029/95wr01487
    https://doi.org/10.1029/95wr01487 [Google Scholar]
  7. S.Uhlemann and O.Kuras
    2014. Numerical Simulations of Capacitive Resistivity Imaging (CRI) Measurements. Near Surface Geophysics12, 523–537. doi:10.3997/1873‑0604.2014008
    https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2014008 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902438
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902438
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error