1887

Abstract

Summary

Ukraine is characterized by active natural hazards processes within different structural and tectonic and landscape-climatic zones. Within the Middle Dnieper Region, the gravitational processes are most widespread. The determining factors of these processes are lithologic and stratigraphic conditions; hydrogeological regime; structural and textural features of rocks; geomorphology of slopes. The second category of factors includes dynamic processes, erosion, weathering, tectonic regime of the area, and anthropogenic impacts. The basis of studies is the structural-morphometric method. Structural morphometry, aimed at investigation of various tectonic structures and vertical movements of the earth’s crust, is the tool to identify the genetic relation between geomorphological and tectonic processes. As a result of the structural-morphometric studies, a number of morphometric models and maps have been built. The most informative from the natural hazards forecasting point of view are the maps of residual relief. On the basis of comprehensive geological-geomorphologic studies, the influence of tectonic movements and exogenous geological factors on the development of natural hazards within the Middle Dnieper Region has been determined. According to the data of structural-morphometric analysis, local structures have been allocated, which are characterized by the formation and activation of hazardous geological processes. They are located mostly at the right steep slope of Dnieper River. Created models are the basis for forecasting of hazardous geological processes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903193
2019-11-12
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. GozhikP., ChuhynniyYu.
    (2005). Research of modern geodynamic of Ukraine.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ivanik, O.
    (2018). Modeling of Landslides and Assessment of Their Impact on Infrastructure Objects in Ukraine. In: WuW., YuHS. (eds) Proceedings of the China-Europe Conference on Geotechnical Engineering. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Cham.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ivanik, O.M., Tustunovska, L.V.
    (2011). Application of classical methods of structurally-morphometric analysis for reconstruction of the latest tectogenesis based on GIS. Bulletin of the Kiev University. Geology, 53, 4–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. KaliukhI, SenatorovV., MarienkovN., TrofymchukO., SilchenkoK., KalyukhT.
    (2015) Arrangement of deep foundation pit in restricted conditions of city build-up in landslide territory with considering of seismic loads of 8 points. In: Proceedings XVI ECSMGE, 13–17 Sept 2015, Edinburgh, Great Britain, pp. 535–540.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MaslovB., ProdaivodaG., VyzhvaS.
    (2001). Mathematical modeling of elastic wave velocity anisotropy in a cracked geological medium. Geophysical Journal. Vol. 20, 2, 191–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Philosophov, V.P.
    (1975) Fundamentals of the morphometric method for the search for tectonic structures. Saratov, 231.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Prokhodsky, S.I.
    (1963). Application of the morphometric method for the analysis of some tectonic structures of the left bank of Ukraine. In the book.: Morphometric method in geological research. Publishing house of Saratov Unitary Enterprise, 231.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903193
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903193
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error