1887

Abstract

Summary

In many areas around the world the impact of internal multiples on seismic data can be strong, due to large subsurface contrasts. There is a choice of removing these multiples in advance and apply primaries-only imaging. Such a method often requires densely sampled data, especially for Marchenko-based approaches. If data sampling is coarser, an image-driven approach can be adequate, where the Earth model is used as a constraint in the inversion. Such an approach is followed by full wavefield migration (FWM) and joint migration inversion (JMI), where the subsurface is parametrized by reflectivity and a velocity model. In this way, internal multiples, together with transmission effects, can be handled and an imprint-free image is ideally obtained. In this paper, the potential and limitations of this approach will be analyzed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202012126
2021-10-18
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A.J. [1982] Seismic migration, imaging of acoustic energy by wave field extrapolation, A: theoretical aspects. Elsevier (second edition).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkhout, A.J. [2014a, b, c] Review Paper: An outlook on the future of seismic imaging, Part I/Part II/Part II. Geoph. Prosp., 62(5), 911–930, 931–949, 950–971.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkhout, A.J. and Verschuur, D.J. [2005] Removal of internal multiples with the common-focus-point (CFP) approach: Part 1 - Explanation of the theory. Geophysics, 70(3), V45–V60.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davydenko, M. and Verschuur, D.J. [2017] Full-wavefield migration: using surface and internal multiples in imaging. Geophys. Prosp., 65(1), 7–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jakubowicz, H. [1998] Wave equation prediction and removal of interbed multiples. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1527–1530.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Staring, M., Pereira, R., Douma, H., van der Neut, J. and Wapenaar, C.P. [2018] Source-receiver Marchenko redatuming on field data using an adaptive double-focusing method. Geophysics, 83(6), S579–S590.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun, Y., Y.S.Kim, S.Qu, D.J.Verschuur, A.Almomin and R.van Borselen [2018] Joint Migration Inversion Versus FWI-RTM - A Comparison Study on a 2D Realistic Deep Water Model. EAGE meeting Copenhagen, Expanded abstracts, Th-P3-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Verschuur, D.J., Staal, X.R. and Berkhout, A.J. [2016] Joint migration inversion: Simultaneous determination of velocity fields and depth images using all orders of scattering. The Leading Edge, 35(12), 1037U˝ 1046.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wapenaar, C.P.A., Broggini, F., Slob, E. and Snieder, R. [2013] Three-Dimensional Single-Sided Marchenko Inverse Scattering, Data-Driven Focusing, Green’s Function Retrieval, and their Mutual Relations. Physical Review Letters, 110, 084301.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Weglein, A.B. [2018] A new and comprehensive perspective on the role of primaries and multiples in seismic-data processing for structure determination and amplitude analysis. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, Anaheim, 4548–4552.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Weglein, A.B., Gasparotto, FA., Carvalho, P.M. and Stolt, R.H. [1997] An inverse scattering series method for attenuating multiples in seismic reflection data. Geophysics, 62, 1975–1989.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, L. and Slob, E.C. [2019] Free-surface and internal multiple elimination in one-step without adaptive subtraction. Geophysics, 84(1), A7–A11.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202012126
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202012126
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error