1887

Abstract

Summary

To handle internal multiples in imaging can be done via data-driven procedures (e.g. Marchenko-based multiple removal) or via an image-driven process that includes an option to model internal multiples from the reflectivities. The advantage of data-driven methods is that it can utilize the physics implicitly available in the data, while the image-driven method has to make this physical model more explicit via an image, which may create some leakage. However, a main advantage of the image-driven approach is that it is very insensitive to coarse source sampling, while data-driven methods requires dense data. The aspect of coarse sampling and its effect on the final multiple suppression effects of the image-driven approach is demonstrated.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202012128
2021-10-18
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A. J. (2014). An outlook on the future of seismic imaging, Part II: Full ‐ Wavefield Migration. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(5), 931–949.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Wapenaar, K., Thorbecke, J., Van Der Neut, J., Broggini, F., Slob, E., & Snieder, R. (2014). Marchenko imaging. Geophysics, 79 (3), WA39–WA57.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Weglein, A. B., Gasparotto, F. A., Carvalho, P. M., & Stolt, R. H. (1997). An inverse-scattering series method for attenuating multiples in seismic reflection data. Geophysics, 62 (6), 1975–1989.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202012128
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202012128
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error