1887

Abstract

Summary

Reservoir monitoring or surveillance is crucial for a responsible and efficient use of subsurface reservoirs. In both production and storage systems, operators need to demonstrate that their assets can be managed in a safe way. Effective monitoring practices also help operators unlock additional value from their assets, by revising expectations, gaining confidence on their projected potentials and allowing development strategies to be adjusted.

The design of monitoring systems can be a challenge for both subsurface operators and regulators. The main difficulties range from the technical uncertainties on subsurface characterization and the unavailability of direct measurements to the lack of technologies to support monitoring design decisions.

As a step to bridge this gap, we have developed a quantitative value-of-information (VOI) methodology within the context of conformance management in CO2 storage operations. It is a practical model-based approach that uses a Bayesian framework to derive a measure of the expected contribution of (future) measurements from candidate monitoring strategies for discrimination of conformance and non-conformance situations.

In this work we integrate our practical VOI approach into an optimization workflow. This novel workflow is applied to determine the optimal design of time-lapse seismic surveys in a realistic CO2 storage case study. Obviously, the larger the spatial coverage of the survey, the more informative it will be. Therefore, the search for cheaper sparse survey designs is by nature a bi-objective problem which needs to consider both the accuracy requirements and the costs of the survey in the same optimization. Our optimization workflow also accounts for the uncertainties associated with the reservoir system by using ensembles of plausible measurement outcomes and model realizations.

Our results show that sparse survey designs can be optimized to reduce costs while keeping accuracy levels comparable to denser designs. Our results also suggest that optimal survey configurations lie on a Pareto front of the two objectives considered, corroborating the idea that the design of cost-efficient monitoring strategies has a multi-objective character.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035155
2020-09-14
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barros, E.G.D., Leeuwenburgh, O., Van den Hof, P.M.J., and Jansen, J.D.
    (2015). Value of Multiple Production Measurements and Water Front Tracking in Closed-Loop Reservoir Management. Paper SPE-175608-MS presented at the SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 14–16 September. DOI:10.2118/175608‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/175608-MS [Google Scholar]
  2. Barros, E.G.D., Van den Hof, P.M.J., and Jansen, J.D.
    (2016). Value of information in closed-loop reservoir management. Computational Geosciences, 20 (3), 737–749. DOI:10.1007/s10596‑015‑9509‑4.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-015-9509-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barros, E.G.D.
    (2018). Value of information in closed-loop reservoir management. PhD dissertation, Delft University of Technology. DOI:10.4233/uuid:9667dc41‑c736‑47e6‑b818‑78c7c50fb08d.
    https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:9667dc41-c736-47e6-b818-78c7c50fb08d [Google Scholar]
  4. Barros, E.G.D., Leeuwenburgh, O., Carpentier, S., Wilschut, F., and Neele, F.
    (2018). Quantifying Efficiency of Field-Wide Geophysical Surveys for Verifying CO2 Plume Conformance During Storage Operations. Paper presented at the 5th CO2 Geological Storage Workshop, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 21–23 November. DOI:10.3997/2214‑4609.201802991.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802991 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barros, E.G.D., Leeuwenburgh, O., and Boullenger, B.
    (2020). Practical quantitative monitoring strategy assessment for conformance verification of CO2 storage projects. Paper to be presented at the 82nd EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8–11 December.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bratvold, R.B., Bickel, J.E., and Lohne, H.P.
    (2009). Value of information in the oil and gas industry: past, present, and future, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 12 (4), 630–638. DOI:10.2118/110378‑PA.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/110378-PA [Google Scholar]
  7. Cameron, D.A.
    (2013). Optimization and monitoring of geological carbon storage operations, PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Y., Oliver, D.S., and Zhang, D.
    (2009). Efficient Ensemble-Based Closed-Loop Reservoir Production Optimization, SPE Journal, 14 (4), 634–645. DOI:10.2118/112873‑PA.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/112873-PA [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, B., Fonseca, R.M., Leeuwenburgh, O., and Reynolds, A.C.
    (2017). Minimizing the risk in the robust life-cycle production optimization using stochastic simplex approximate gradient, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 153, 331–334. DOI:10.1016/j.petrol.2017.04.001.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Datta, B., Chakrabarty, D., and Dhar, A.
    (2009). Optimal dynamic monitoring network design and identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources, Water Resources Management, 23, 2031–2049. doi:10.1007/s11269‑008‑9368‑z.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9368-z [Google Scholar]
  11. Fonseca, R.M., Stordal, A. S., Leeuwenburgh, O., Van den Hof, P.M.J., and Jansen, J.D.
    (2014). Robust ensemble-based multi-objective optimization, Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery (ECMOR XIV), Catania, Italy, 8–11 September. DOI:10.3997/2214‑4609.20141895.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20141895 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fonseca, R.M., Chen B.
    (2017). A Stochastic Simplex Approximate Gradient (StoSAG) for optimization under uncertainty, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 109 (13), 1756–1776. DOI:10.1002/nme.5342.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5342 [Google Scholar]
  13. He, J., Xie, J., Sarma, P., Wen, X.-H., Chen, W H., and Kamath, J., Jansen, J.D., and Reynolds, A.C.
    (2016). Proxy-based work flow for a priori evaluation of data-acquisition programs, SPE Journal, 21 (4), 1400–1412. DOI:10.2118/173229‑PA.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/173229-PA [Google Scholar]
  14. He, J., Sarma, P., Bhark, E., Tanaka, S., Chen, B., Wen, X.-H., and Kamath, J.
    (2018). Quantifying Expected Uncertainty Reduction and Value of Information using Ensemble-Variance Analysis, SPE Journal, 23 (2), 428–448. DOI:10.2118/182609‑PA.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/182609-PA [Google Scholar]
  15. Leeuwenburgh, O., and Arts, R.
    (2014). Distance parameterization for efficient seismic history matching with the ensemble Kalman Filter, Computational Geosciences, 18, 535–548. DOI:10.1007/s10596‑014‑9434‑y.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-014-9434-y [Google Scholar]
  16. Leeuwenburgh, O., Egberts, P.J.P., and Chitu, A.G.
    (2015). An ensemble-based method for constrained reservoir life-cycle optimization. Paper SPE-174318-MS paper presented at EUROPEC, Madrid, Spain, 1–4 June. DOI:10.2118/174318‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/174318-MS [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, J., Lu, W., Wang, H., and Fan, Y.
    (2019). Identification of groundwater contamination sources using a statistical algorithm based on an improved Kalman filter and simulation optimization, Hydrogeology Journal, 27, 2919–2931. DOI:10.1007/s10040‑019‑02030‑y.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-02030-y [Google Scholar]
  18. Loaiciga, H. A.
    (1989). An optimization approach for groundwater quality monitoring network design, Water Resources Research, 25 (8), 1771–1782. DOI:10.1029/WR025i008p01771.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/WR025i008p01771 [Google Scholar]
  19. Meyer, P.D.
    (1994). Monitoring network design to provide initial detection of groundwater contamination, Water Resources Research, 30 (9), 2647–2659. DOI:10.1029/94WR00872.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00872 [Google Scholar]
  20. Siade, A.J., Hall, J., and Karelse, R.N.
    (2017). A practical, robust methodology for acquiring new observation data using computationally expensive groundwater models, Water Resources Research, 53 (11), 9860–9882. DOI:10.1002/2017WR020814.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020814 [Google Scholar]
  21. van de Poll, T., Barros, E.G.D., Langenkamp, W., Szklarz, S.P., and Fonseca, R.M.
    (2020). Incorporating Uncertainties in A Model-Based Data-Driven Framework Using Transfer Learning. Paper to be presented at 17th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery (ECMOR XVII), Edinburgh, UK, 14–17 September.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sun, W. and Durlofsky, L.J.
    (2017). A New Data-Space Inversion Procedure for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification in Subsurface Flow Problems. Mathematical Geosciences, 49, 679–715. DOI: 10.1007/s11004‑016‑9672‑8.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-016-9672-8 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035155
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035155
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error