1887

Abstract

Summary

The work is devoted to the results of GPR survey performed in the summer of 2019 at one of the sections of the Central Ring Road (Moscow Region). The purpose of these works is to determine the thickness of the bulk layer of the road embankment in areas of replacement of weak soils. The bulk layer is represented by sand of medium size with inclusions of crushed stone, sometimes heavily flooded. The thickness of the bulk layer varies from 2.5 m to 4 m. In the interpretation, special attention was directed to the allocation of peaty areas. GPR was chosen to solve this problem, since this method has proven itself in similar works, because among non-destructive methods it provides the highest resolution at shallow depths.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202051056
2020-09-14
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ВладовМ.Л., СтаровойтовА.В., КалашниковА.Ю.
    [2005]. Некоторые вопросы интерпретации георадиолокационных данных при изучении железнодорожных насыпей. Разведка и охрана недр. 2005. 2. 15–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. МальскийК. С., РомановВ. В.
    [2016] Исследование состояния горных выработок сейсмическими методами и георадиолокацией // Горный информационно-аналитический бюллетень (научно-технический журнал). 2016. 8. 296–305.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. РомановВ. В.
    Из опыта комплексного применения сейсморазведки и георадиолокации при инженерно-геологических изысканиях на территории Москвы. Инженерные изыскания. 2015. 5-6. 44–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. РомановВ.В., МальскийК.С., ПосеренинА.И., ДроновА.Н., ИвановА.А.
    [2018]. Комплекс геофизических методов исследований полигонов твердых отходов горнодобывающих предприятий. Горный информационно-аналитический бюллетень (научно-технический журнал). 11. 14–120. DOI: 10.25018/0236‑1493‑2018‑11‑0‑114‑120
    https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2018-11-0-114-120 [Google Scholar]
  5. РомановВ.В., МальскийК.С., ПосеренинА.И., КаринскийА.Д.
    [2018]. Оценка устойчивости и обводненности породного массива геофизическими методами. Горный журнал. 2018. 11. 61–64. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2018.11.11
    https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2018.11.11 [Google Scholar]
  6. EvgenyZverev, AlexandraUrusova, AndreyIvanov & MaximShiribokov
    [2012]. GPR diagnosis of historical and cultural objects. Published in 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) 2012. 620–624. DOI: 10.1109/ICGPR.2012.6254938
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2012.6254938 [Google Scholar]
  7. A.V.Urusova, A.A.Ivanov, V.V.Monakhov, N.G.Pudova and M.P.Shirobokov
    [2010]. Restoration of the Historico-architectural Plan of the Voskresensky New-Jerusalem Monastery by Geophysical Methods. Conference Proceedings, Near Surface 2010 - 16th EAGE European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Sep 2010, cp-164-00062. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‑4609.20144827
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20144827 [Google Scholar]
  8. VladovM., StarovoitovA., KalashnikovA.
    [2005]. Nekotoryye voprosy interpretatsii georadiolokatsionnykh dannykh pri izuchenii zheleznodorozhnykh nasypey. Razvedka i okhrana nedr. 2005. 2. 15–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mal’skijK. S., RomanovV. V.
    [2016] Issledovanie sostojanija gornyh vyrabotok sejsmicheskimi metodami i georadiolokaciej // Gornyj informacionno-analiticheskij bjulleten’ (nauchno-tehnicheskij zhurnal). 2016. 8. 296–305.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. RomanovV. V.
    [2015] Iz opyta kompleksnogo primenenija sejsmorazvedki i georadiolokacii pri inzhenerno-geologicheskih izyskanijah na territorii Moskvy. Inzhenernye izyskanija. 2015. 5-6. 44–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. RomanovV.V., Mal’skijK.S., PosereninA.I., DronovA.N., IvanovA.A.
    [2018]. Kompleks geofizicheskih metodov issledovanij poligonov tverdyh othodov gornodobyvajushhih predprijatij. Gornyj informacionno-analiticheskij bjulleten’ (nauchno-tehnicheskij zhurnal). 11. 14–120. DOI: 10.25018/0236‑1493‑2018‑11‑0‑114‑120
    https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2018-11-0-114-120 [Google Scholar]
  12. RomanovV.V., Mal’skijK.S., PosereninA.I., KarinskijA.D.
    [2018]. Ocenka ustojchivosti i obvodnennosti porodnogo massiva geofizicheskimi metodami. Gornyj zhurnal. 2018. 11. 61–64. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2018.11.11
    https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2018.11.11 [Google Scholar]
  13. EvgenyZverev, AlexandraUrusova, AndreyIvanov & MaximShiribokov
    [2012]. GPR diagnosis of historical and cultural objects. Published in 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) 2012. 620–624. DOI: 10.1109/ICGPR.2012.6254938
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2012.6254938 [Google Scholar]
  14. A.V.Urusova, A.A.Ivanov, V.V.Monakhov, N.G.Pudova and M.P.Shirobokov
    [2010]. Restoration of the Historico-architectural Plan of the Voskresensky New-Jerusalem Monastery by Geophysical Methods. Conference Proceedings, Near Surface 2010 - 16th EAGE European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Sep 2010, cp-164-00062. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‑4609.20144827
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20144827 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202051056
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202051056
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error