Emprical Mode Decomposition of Results of Profile Measurements of Electric Fields

References

1. БалкП.И., ДолгальА.С., ПугинА.В., МичуринА.В., СимановА.А., ШархимуллинА.Ф.
   [2016] Эффективные алгоритмы истокообразной аппроксимации геопотенциальных полей. Физика Земли, 6, 112–128.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ДолгальА.С., СимановА.А.
   [2008] Применение кратномасштабного вейвлет-анализа при аналитических аппроксимациях геопотенциальных полей. Докл. Академии наук, 418 (2), 256–261.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ДолгальА.С., ХристенкоЛ.А.
   [2017] Применение эмпирической модовой декомпозиции при обработке геофизических данных. Изв. Томского политехнич. ун-та. Инжиниринг ресурсов. 328 (1), 100–108.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ТрусовА.А. ПетровА.В.
   [2000] Компьютерная технология статистического и спектрально-корреляционного анализа трехмерной геоинформации – КОСКАД 3D. Геофизика, 4, 29–33.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ХристенкоЛ.А., СтепановЮ.И., КичигинА.В., ПаршаковЕ.И., ТайницкийА.А., ШиряевК.Н.
   [2017] Совершенствование интерпретации данных мониторинговых электроразведочных наблюдений с помощью аппарата теории оценок. Инженерная геофизика. Кисловодск. DOI: 10.3997/2214–4609.201700419. Электрон. изд. режим доступа: http://www.earthdoc.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=88140. Code 129037.
   https://doi.org/10.3997/2214–4609.201700419 [Google Scholar]
6. HristenkoL., StepanovYu., KichiginA., ParshakovE., TainitskyA.
   [2018] Interpretation of electroprospecting monitoring observations with use of probabilistic-statistical characteristics. Engineering and mining Geophysics: 14th Conference & Exhibition. Almaty, Kazakhstan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‑4609.201800511
   https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201800511 [Google Scholar]
7. HuangN.E., ShenZ., LongS.R., WuM.C., ShihH.H., ZhengQ., YenN.-C., TungС.С, LiuH. H.
   [1998] The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the royal society A-Mathematical physical and engineering sciences, 454 (1971). DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193
   https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193 [Google Scholar]
8. Huang, N. E., and Z.Wu
   [2008] A review on Hilbert-Huang transform: Method and its applications to geophysical studies, Rev. Geophys, 46, RG2006, doi:10.1029/2007RG000228.
   https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000228 [Google Scholar]
9. KhristenkoL.A., StepanovJ.I., KichiginA.V., ParshakovE.I., TainickiyA.A., ShiryaevK.N.
   [2019] Using of Probabilistic-Statistical Characteristics in the Interpretation of Electrical Survey Monitoring Observations. In: NurgalievD., KhairullinaN. (eds) Practical and Theoretical Aspects of Geological Interpretation of Gravitational, Magnetic and Electric Fields. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑319‑97670‑9_36
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97670-9_36 [Google Scholar]
10. BalkP.I., DolgalA.S., PuginA.V., MichurinA.V., SimanovA.A., SharhimullinA.F.
    [2016] Effective algorithms of source-like approximation of geopotential fields. Earth Physics, 6, 112–128.
    [Google Scholar]
11. DolgalA.S., SimanovA.A.
    [2008] Multiple-scale wavelet analysis in analytical approximations of geopotential fields. Reports of the AN RAS, 2008. T. 418 № 2. Рр. 256–261.
    [Google Scholar]
12. DolgalA.S., KhristenkoL.A.
    [2017] Application of Empirical Mode Decomposition method in processing geophysical data. News of TPU, Tomsk. Resource Engineering, 328 (1), 100–108.
    [Google Scholar]
13. TrusovA.A. PetrovA.V.
    [2000] Computer technology of statistical and spectral-correlation analysis of three-dimensional geoinformation - COSCAD 3D. Geophysics, 4, 29–33.
    [Google Scholar]
14. HristenkoL.A., KichiginA.V., ParshakovE.I., ShiryaevK.N., StepanovY.I. and TainickiyA.A.
    [2017] Improvement of Interpretation of the Monitoring Data Electrical Investigation by Means of the Theory of Estimates. Conference Proceedings, 13th Conference and Exhibition Engineering Geophysics. https://www.earthdoc.org/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700419
    [Google Scholar]
15. HristenkoL., StepanovYu., KichiginA., ParshakovE., TainitskyA.
    [2018] Interpretation of electroprospecting monitoring observations with use of probabilistic-statistical characteristics. Engineering and mining Geophysics: 14th Conference & Exhibition. Almaty, Kazakhstan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‑4609.201800511
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201800511 [Google Scholar]
16. HuangN.E., ShenZ., LongS.R., WuM.C., ShihH.H., ZhengQ., YenN.-C., TungС.С., LiuH. H.
    [1998] The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the royal society A-Mathematical physical and engineering sciences, 454 (1971). DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193 [Google Scholar]
17. Huang, N. E., and Z.Wu
    [2008] A review on Hilbert-Huang transform: Method and its applications to geophysical studies, Rev. Geophys, 46, RG2006, doi:10.1029/2007RG000228.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000228 [Google Scholar]
18. KhristenkoL.A., StepanovJ.I., KichiginA.V., ParshakovE.I., TainickiyA.A., ShiryaevK.N.
    [2019] Using of Probabilistic-Statistical Characteristics in the Interpretation of Electrical Survey Monitoring Observations. In: NurgalievD., KhairullinaN. (eds) Practical and Theoretical Aspects of Geological Interpretation of Gravitational, Magnetic and Electric Fields. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑319‑97670‑9_36
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97670-9_36 [Google Scholar]