1887

Abstract

Summary

Time-Lapse electrical resistivity tomography (TL-ERT) is used to monitor dynamic processes through mapping the resistivity variations in the subsurface. Inversion of TL-ERT data is a highly non-linear and ill-conditioned problem characterized by non-unique solutions. For this reason, an accurate uncertainty appraisal is essential to quantify the ambiguity affecting the estimated resistivity model. We present a probabilistic TL-ERT inversion in which the Differential Evolution Markov Chain (DEMC) algorithm samples the posterior probability density function, while the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) is used to compress the model space. The model compression aims at mitigating both the ill-conditioned nature of the inversion problem and the curse of dimensionality issue. On the other hand, the DEMC combines principles coming from metaheuristic optimisation methods and Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms to speed up the probabilistic sampling. To draw essential conclusions about the reliability and applicability of the implemented algorithm, we focus on synthetic inversion experiments in which we simulate two data acquisitions at different time instants (t0 and t1) and we jointly estimate the resistivity model at t0 along with the resistivity changes at t1. The results demonstrate that the implemented method provides accurate model predictions and uncertainty estimations with an affordable computational cost.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120115
2021-08-29
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, N., Natarajan, T., and Rao, K.R.
    , (1974). Discrete Cosine Transform.IEEE Transactions On Computers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aleardi, M., Vinciguerra, A., and Hojat, A.
    (2021). A geostatistical Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion algorithm for electrical resistivity tomography.Near Surface Geophysics, 19(1), 7–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aleardi, M.
    (2020). Discrete cosine transform for parameter space reduction in linear and non-linear AVA inversions.Journal of Applied Geophysics, 179, 104106.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Günther, T., Rücker, C, and Spitzer, K.
    (2006). Three-dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography — II.Inversion, Geophysical Journal International.166, 506–517.7
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tresoldi, G, Hojat, A., Zanzi, L.
    (2020) GRE.T.A. installations for real-time monitoring of irrigation dams and canals.Procedia Environmental Science, Engineering and Management, 7 (2), 271–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Vinciguerra, A., Aleardi, M., Hojat, A.
    , and Stucchi. (2020). Discrete cosine transform for parameter space reduction in Bayesian ERT inversion.EAGE Near Surface Geoscience Conference 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Vrugt, J.
    (2016). Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: Theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation.Environmental Modelling & Software.75. 273–316. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.013.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.013 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120115
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120115
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error