Evaluating Capability of Automated Detection and Location Method for the Case of Intermediate-depth Earthquakes from Vrancea

References

1. Li, L., Tan, J., Schwarz, B., Staněk, F., Poiata, N., Shi, P., Diekmann, L., Eisner, L. and Gajewski, D.
   [2020]. Recent advances and challenges of waveform-based seismic location methods at multiple scales. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(1), p.e2019RG000667.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Oncescu, M.C., Marza, V., Rizescu, M., Popa, M.
   [1999]. The Romanian earthquakes catalogue between 984 and 1997. In: Wenzel, F., Lungu, D. (Eds.), Vrancea Earthquakes: Tectonics, Hazard and Risk Mitigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 43–47.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Poiata, N., Satriano, C., Vilotte, J.P., Bernard, P. and Obara, K.
   [2016]. Multiband array detection and location of seismic sources recorded by dense seismic networks. Geophysical Journal International, 205(3), pp.1548–1573.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Poiata, N., Vilotte, J.P., Bernard, P., Satriano, C. and Obara, K.
   [2018]. Imaging different components of a tectonic tremor sequence in southwestern Japan using an automatic statistical detection and location method. Geophysical Journal International, 213(3), pp.2193–2213.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Prieto, G.A., Beroza, G.C., Barrett, S.A., López, G.A. and Florez, M.
   [2012]. Earthquake nests as natural laboratories for the study of intermediate-depth earthquake mechanics. Tectonophysics, 570, pp.42–56.
   [Google Scholar]