1887

Abstract

Summary

The object of this work was a large oil and gas condensate carbonate field in Eastern Siberia. The target interval at the field is the riphean reservoirs, which are represented by an impermeable carbonate matrix permeated by a dense network of micro-macro cracks of various orientations, caverns and leaching intervals. The affected area was subjected to an active and multi-stage tectonic impact, which led to the widespread development of numerous low-amplitude, sub-vertical faults and fracture zones of a predominantly shear nature. The main intervals of the section are represented by the Archean basement, Proterozoic (Riphean-Vend), Paleozoic (Cambrian, Ordovician, etc.) and Upper (HCR) parts of the section. The Paleozoic part of the section consists mainly of Cambrian carbonate-halogen-sulfate rocks and traps, presumably of Triassic age. The wave pattern of the Cambrian rocks is characterized by relatively laterally sustained seismic reflections with a small number of interpreted faults. The shape of the wave pattern, or in other words, the seismic images/seismophations, are mainly high-amplitude, laterally sustained with increased reflection and impedance coefficients. Potential reservoirs in this part of the section are most often represented by relatively dense carbonates, which are characterized by a small number of secondary changes in carbonate rocks. The main risks when drilling GS are the presence of abnormally high absorption of drilling fluid (up to loss of circulation), the presence of tool failures, frequent wear of bits, the presence of silicification. More than half of the current fund of producing wells have a high gas factor or significant water cut. To solve the described problems, it was decided to create a number of criteria for laying horizontal wells, taking into account the seismogeological conditions of the section.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202154030
2021-05-24
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 1.GhafooriM. R.Secondary Porosity: A Key Parameter Controlling the Hydrocar-bon Production in Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoirs (Case Study) / M. R.Ghafoori, M.Roostaeian and V. A.Sajjadian // PETROPHYSICS. – VOL. 50. – NO. 1. – FEBRUARY 2009. – P. 67–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.Machel, H.G. (1993) Anhidrite nodules formed during deep burial.J. Sediment. Petrol. V.63. P. 659–662.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.NelsonR.A.Geologic Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, 2nd Edition. – 2001. – 332 р.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.TuckerM.E., WrightV.P. (1990) Carbonate sedimentology. Oxford: Blackwell, 482 p.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202154030
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202154030
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error