- Home
- Conferences
- Conference Proceedings
- Conferences
Second EAGE Workshop on Permanent Reservoir Monitoring 2013 – Current and Future Trends
- Conference date: 02 Jul 2013 - 05 Jul 2013
- Location: Stavanger, Norway
- ISBN: 978-90-73834-51-4
- Published: 03 July 2013
1 - 20 of 29 results
-
-
Ekofisk Permanent Seismic Monitoring - Results after First 2 Years
Authors P.G. Folstad, A. Bertrand, B. Lyngnes, N. Haller and A. GrandiIn this paper, we will show a selection of cases where 4D seismic data from the Ekofisk seismic monitoring system have been used to impact business decisions related to injection and production from the Ekofisk reservoir.
-
-
-
Jubarte PRM: First Deep-Water Optical 4D4C WAZ and Microseismic Systems
Authors E.A. Thedy, P.R.S. Johann, W.L. Ramos Filho and J.G.R. SilvaIn December 2012, Petrobras began the seismic survey of its first deep-water permanent reservoir monitoring (PRM) at Jubarte oilfield, in the Campos Basin. The Jubarte PRM seismic system equipment used was purchased from PGS/Optoseis™. The system comprises a fully 4C fiber-optic sensor array installed on the seabed and an optoelectronics controlling and recording unit installed on the topside of the floating production, storage and offloading vessel (FPSO) P-57. Upon completion of installation of the system in deep-water, Petrobras with PGS shall acquire active seismic data at least once a year using a seismic source vessel and passive or microseismic data between them.
-
-
-
Pushing the Limits - 4D Life of Field Seismic at BC-10 Brazil
Authors H.G. Farmer, G. Buksh, B.W. Schostak and P. NorbergShell is installing its first full-field LoFS system in the Argonauta Field, Campos Basin, Brazil. There have been significant challenges in the design and execution of this fast-track project within the confines of an existing subsea infrastructure and the ~1650m water depth. The system will provide very high quality time lapse surveys, as needed, to enable management of an efficient waterflood.
-
-
-
Permanent Reservoir Monitoring with Onshore Surface Seismic
Authors K. Hornman and E. ForguesMany of the arguments that are used for permanent seismic monitoring for offshore reservoirs also apply to onshore monitoring, but there are also differences. A permanent installation removes at least one source of repeatability problems, because there will be no receiver position differences between base and monitor surveys. For land surveys (and for Ocean Bottom Node surveys) receiver and shot position differences can be nearly avoided with careful acquisition, while for streamer surveys the unpredictable currents will always lead to some position differences, although tidal shooting and steerable streamers can reduce that problem. However, even perfect repositioning of sources and receivers will not solve all repeatability problems for land surveys because of the changing nearsurface between base and monitor survey. The use of buried sources and receivers will improve that situation, but even then careful acquisition and processing is required to remove, for instance, seasonally-changing source and receiver ghosts. This can be done successfully, as demonstrated in a permanent seismic monitoring trial of thermal EOR, in Schoonebeek, The Netherlands, where a seismic monitor surveys was acquired on a daily basis. The progress of the steam front could be monitored with surprising detail. Another similarity for offshore and onshore monitoring is that the economic benefits of a permanent installation, compared to surveys with retrievable equipment, materialize only after a number of monitor surveys have been acquired due to the upfront installation costs of the permanent system. If the changes in the reservoir are not very rapid, or if the operator of the field has no options to react with well management based on the rapid reservoir changes, then it becomes more difficult to make a business case for a permanent installation. The magnitude of the problem is more acute for onshore than for offshore applications, because onshore wells are typically significantly less costly than offshore wells. In this paper we give an overview of the results of the permanent onshore seismic monitoring trial at Schoonebeek and discuss the options to reduce the costs while maintaining the required accuracy of the monitoring results.
-
-
-
Ekofisk PRM: A Look at Some of the Technology and How it Might Evolve
Authors H. Hoeber, S. Buizard, A. Gresillaud, S. de Pierrepont, A. Bertrand, P.G. Folstad, A. Grandi and H. NakstadIn this paper, we take a closer look at some of the technology used and the research carried out over the first two years on the Ekofisk PRM project. This includes QC issues for the acquisition; signal processing issues (such as 4D robustness of rotations; interference and VZ noise methods; surface consistent amplitude corrections); sensor performance and solutions to problems found; optimal imaging solutions such as FWI. Furthermore we report on the evolution of the Ekofisk operations in the coming months and discuss opportunities and possibilities arising via enhanced acquisition technology, improved processing and imaging, data management, and the potential for other reservoir oriented methods such as passive seismic monitoring.
-
-
-
Full Solution Deep-water PRM Project in the Jubarte Field in Brazil for Petrobras by PGS
Authors S. Seth, S. Maas, B. Bunn, R. Metzbower, E. Wersich, P. Johann, E. Thedy and W. LisboaPGS has recently completed deployment of the world’s first, and to this date only, full-solution deep-water PRM project in the Jubarte field in Brazil for Petrobras. The project includes a fully fiber-optic system, topside installation on the FPSO, marine installation of the system in deep-water, the acquisition of active data using a shooting vessel, the acquisition of passive seismic data as well as data-processing of both active and passive data. In addition to describing the final solution and showing what was done, the paper shall also describe some of the steps done prior to implementation. This includes initial efforts to design, certify and build the system, followed by or in parallel preparations to deploy the system offshore. The presentation shall also briefly describe how the unique optical system works and its components. The system itself includes a wide range of different items – from top-side Opto-electronics to a riser, lead-in cables, a sub-sea hub with optical wet-mates, as well as the actual seismic array cables with optical 4C sensor stations over the field. This presentation may also cover some of the hurdles to introduce 4D PRM and permanent monitoring, as well as opportunities to overcome the same, if time permits.
-
-
-
Ekofisk PRM Seismic Operations
Authors A. Bertrand, G. Jeangeot, P.G. Folstad, A. Grandi, S. Buizard, H. Hoeber, H. Al-Khatib and H. NakstadThe world’s largest optical Permanent Reservoir Monitoring (PRM) system was installed at Ekofisk in 2010. The Ekofisk LoFS system consists of nearly 4000 seabed multicomponent sensors and a top side recording unit provided by Optoplan and a containerized source operated on a supply vessel. After the first 4 surveys, all the sensors were still active and very high repeatability (3-4% NRMS) had been achieved. One of the key factors to unraveling full value of a PRM system is to be able to handle seismic operations in a safe, integrated and efficient manner in order to deliver high quality seismic volumes for interpretation in a rapid turnaround. In this paper, we present the different aspects of seismic operations at Ekofisk: seismic source, recording system and data transfer, QC and processing, and discuss how their integration enables timely delivery of high quality 4D seismic products.
-
-
-
The Rock Strewn Road to Getting Sanction for Investment in PRM
By D.N. NorbergPRM systems are known to provide excellent reservoir monitoring information. Still after ten years of operation of the first commercial system, PRM is in an experimental stage for most operators when considering methods of acquiring seismic data. Facilium has worked in more than twenty five projects, worldwide, with more than ten clients in attempting to establish PRM systems, and have been involved in all existing, some future and some lost cases. Some of the experience in the attempt to achieving sanction for investment in PRM is expressed in “The rock strewn path to sanction of PRM”.
-
-
-
System Installed and Operating, Now what Do I do with the Data?
By C. NealeMuch time and effort is spent in obtaining internal approval for PRM systems, installing them, and then processing the raw data. But regardless of the justification used to approve a PRM system, the processed results are valuable only if the output is integrated with other data sets to understand reservoir dynamics in a context that influences business decisions. Long term reservoir monitoring in shale plays is achieved using permanently installed geophone arrays over areas of 400 sq km or more. The raw data from these systems are processed to locate microseismic activity associated with hydraulic fracture stimulation. This discussion will focus on a study performed on two adjoining pads in the Horn River basin, NE British Columbia where microseismic data is integrated with many other data sources to develop a set of usable predictive correlations to guide future development in the area. Other data incorporated includes seismic attribute volumes, well logs, FMI’s, production data, tracer data, pressure transient data, and core data. The specific results from this study may not be directly applicable to offshore reservoirs monitored by PRM systems, but the workflow for data integration are applicable to the development and depletion of any hydrocarbon system.
-
-
-
Using Permanent Arrays for Shallow Monitoring
Authors M. Landro, P. Rodriguez, T. Røste and M. ThompsonIt is suggested to acquire frequent low cost seismic data over a field equipped with a permanent receiver system. The source pattern could be one or two permanent sources located on platforms, or 3-5 2D shooting lines covering the field. Modeling examples showing the feasibility of both acquisiton methods and their ability to detect for instance gas leakage or overburden velocity changes caused by geomechanical changes will be presented. Most producing hydrocarbon reservoirs will compact, and therefore corresponding sea floor subsidence is expected. We propose to use time lapse tilt meter readings from a dense permanent array to estimate seafloor subsidence. We suggest to combine tilt meter measurements with sparse permanent pressure sensors located at the seabed.
-
-
-
4D Seismic Interpretation with Frequently Acquired, Multiple Time-lapsed Surveys
Authors C. MacBeth, Y. Huang and R. FalahatPermanent installations delivering frequent multiple time-lapsed seismic surveys offer many advantages to data processing and seismic inversion. It is natural that provision of seismic data at a time-scale scale closer to the production/reservoir engineer should open up a range of innovative technologies for 4D seismic interpretation such as pressure-saturation change estimation, connectivity analysis and history matching. However, these dynamic data must also be interpreted to ensure the time constants of the reservoir processes involved with production and injection are properly factored into the analysis. Whilst operational practicalities and budget usually determine the exact frequency and timing of survey shoots, the benefit of understanding the processes we discuss is that they help to further constrain the key controlling parameters of the reservoir fluid flow simulation model, and improve its ultimate forward predictive capability.
-
-
-
The Optics of Distributed Vibration Sensing
Authors A. H. Hartog, O.I. Kotov and L.B. LiokumovichIn distributed vibration sensing (DVS) - also known as distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) technology, an optical fibre is deployed in the borehole to be surveyed and is used to detect seismic waves originating from a source outside the well. Although the EAGE and SEG literature describes the results of using DVS for borehole seismic applications, essentially nothing has been written about the underlying optical technology in the geophysics technical literature. This paper therefore outlines the main methods that are probably used by the main participants in the DVS activity, insofar as this can be deduced from publications in the field of fibre optics and the patent literature.
-
-
-
Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Permanent Downhole Monitoring
By D J HillIn recent years a new fibre-optic based technology, Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS), has emerged which has the potential to revolutionise permanent downhole monitoring. DAS uses a standard single-mode optical fibre deployed along the entire length of the wellbore as the sensor and is able to measure both acoustic and seismic signals along the wellbore. Fibre-optic cable deployed permanently in the well is now being used to monitor the fluid and proppant placement and in-flow along the production zone. Furthermore the fibre can be used to take Vertical Seismic Profile (VSP) measurements in wells where the deployment of conventional geophone is not possible. Once the DAS fibre is permanently deployed no further well intervention is necessary enabling low cost repeat measurements to be made. This technology has the opportunity to transform the ability to make time-lapse VSP measurements. In this paper, we will present further details of the permanent downhole applications for DAS and provide case studies of how DAS is being used in time-lapse VSP and permanent flow measurements.
-
-
-
Distributed Acoustic Sensing: Recent Field Data and Performance Validation
Authors T.R. Parker, S.V. Shatalin, M. Farhadiroushan and D. MillerSilixa’s iDAS distributed acoustic sensor faithfully captures the full acoustic signal at every metre along a length of optical fibre many kilometres long. The iDAS has been used in a range of surface and downhole monitoring applications, including flow measurement, vertical seismic profiling, hydraulic fracture monitoring and surface seismic imaging. The system performance and applications of this technology are rapidly evolving; in this presentation we will be showing some of the more recent results across the PRM application space.
-
-
-
Simultaneous Multiwell VSP using Distributed Acoustic Sensing
Authors K. N. Madsen, S. Dümmong, A. Kritski, D. Finfer, A. Gillies and P. TravisIn a collaborative project between Silixa, Weatherford and Statoil, simultaneous multiwell VSP data were successfully acquired using intelligent Distributed Acoustic Sensing (iDAS). The iDAS enables the use of an optic fibre as a massive seismic sensor array. In this field trial the iDAS was retrofitted to existing fibres installed for other purposes. Simultaneous measurements were carried out using 4 iDAS units retrofitted to fibres in three different wells coming up to the same platform. Several seismic lines were shot, e.g. one above each of the well tracks, while listening in the well directly below the shots and also in neighbouring wells at an angle to the shot line. All three wells were producing during the trial and the downhole seismic data were acquired without disturbing the well operations. Consequently data hold information about the flow in the well in addition to the seismic information.
-
-
-
Use of Modelling to Optimize the PRM Geometry for Active and Passive Seismic Analyses
Authors A.H. Drottning, L. Zuhlsdorff, E. Bergfjord and T.A. RasmussenAn important application of seismic modeling is to optimize the acquisition geometry for PRM. For active PRM, the goal is to find best shot and receiver locations based on kinematic and dynamic illumination mapping. For passive PRM the challenge is reduced to finding best receiver locations based on the different targets that are monitored. Seismic illumination modelling is a powerful tool for optimizing the geometry of the PRM station network in both active and passive analyses to maximize the recorded signal strength and to minimize the areal spread of the stations. Seismic illumination maps offer both accuracy and flexibility to identify the characteristic properties of parameters such as hit density and multi-component amplitude strength for various offset and azimuth combinations. Advanced modelling also offers the possibility to generate synthetic microseismic data that are suitable for processing to investigate detection capability and accuracy in noisy environments.
-
-
-
New Techniques to Improve Microseismic Event Detection and Location in Surface Data
Authors D. Raymer, T. Probert, A. Özbek and I. BradfordThe recent expansion of surface and near-surface microseismic monitoring during hydraulic fracturing has led to the development of techniques that are directly applicable to more general permanent microseismic reservoir monitoring. Recent work associated with surface and near-surface microseismic monitoring of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas in the Fayetteville and Marcellus formations has helped to develop new methods to process low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) data. Improvements to the SNR by stacking the data using novel non-linear stacking techniques and stacking of perforation shots allows the use of Coalescence Migration Mapping (CMM), an established technique used for downhole monitoring, to detect and locate microseismic events from surface data.
-
-
-
Utilizing PRM Systems for Injection Monitoring
Authors J.E. Lindgard and T. MatveevaSeismic ocean bottom monitoring solutions can contribute with useful information both for monitoring the caprock integrity as well as fluid movement and pressure build ups, avoiding unwanted events. For decades active 4D seismic has given excellent results in mapping changes in the reservoir parameters. Recent developments, mainly driven by the unconventional reservoirs, show that there is also a significant potential in real time monitoring using the seismic sensors in passive mode. Many of the challenges with injection are related to the lack of frequent active seismic 4D monitor surveys. 4D towed surveys are costly, hence in some cases the injection operations are carried out without sufficient information to take the right management decisions for optimal results. Existing field examples from the NCS are ranging from injection for IOR failing to provide the expected result due to flood barriers under seismic resolution to more dramatic examples of cap rock failure leading to surface leakage. If passive microseismic methods can be utilized on a permanent or semi-permanent monitoring system, issues like fluid movement or cap rock failure can be mapped in real time, providing information for the asset team to take action.
-