1887
Volume 18 Number 1
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The majority of sediment acoustics research has focused to date on sediments with sand‐sized particles or smaller; measurements for sediments containing cobbles (6–26 cm) are rare. This paper presents the first measurements (to the authors’ knowledge) over a wide frequency range of compressional‐wave velocity and bulk density for a sediment with cobbles. The velocity from inversion from wide‐angle reflection‐coefficient data at 0.4–2 kHz for cobbles suspended in sand is found here to be 1800 m/s with 95% credibility interval bounds of [1787–1828] m/s and for cobbles suspended in clay 1532 [1528–1536] m/s. Measured core velocities at 50 kHz and 200 kHz are lower for each sediment due to multiple scattering. The bulk density for cobbles suspended in sand is 2.25 [2.21–2.28] g/cm3 and for cobbles suspended in clay 1.83 [1.78–1.87] g/cm3. Though cobbles in the upper few metres of sediment may be considered unusual on the mid‐shelf at mid‐latitudes, they appear to be present over tens of square kilometres on the Malta Plateau in a several metre thick layer starting at about 1 m below seafloor. In fact, geologic process considerations suggest that cobbles may be generally more common in mid to outer shelf environments than the paucity of measurements would suggest. Increased interest in the Arctic continental shelf environment, where pebbles and cobbles are expected to be prevalent, provides an additional motivation for this work.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12081
2020-01-20
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BelcourtJ., HollandC.W., DossoS.E. and DettmerJ.2019. Depth‐dependent geoacoustic estimates with dispersion from the New England Mud Patch via reflection coefficient inversion. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BiotM.A.1962. Generalized theory of acoustic propagation in porous dissipative media. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America34, 1254–1264.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BowlesF.A.1997. Observations on attenuation and shear‐wave velocity in fine‐grained, marine sediments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America101, 3385–3397.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BracchiV.A., BassoD., SaviniA. and CorselliC.2019. Algal reefs (Coralligenous) from glacial stages: origin and nature of a submerged tabular relief (Hyblean Plateau, Italy). Marine Geology411, 119‐132.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BrekovskikhL.M. and GodinO.A.1998. Waves in Layered Media I, pp. 29–30. Springer‐Verlag, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BryanG.M.1974. Sonobuoy measurements in thin layers. In: Physics of Sound in Marine Sediments (ed L.Hampton), pp. 119–130. Plenum, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BryanG.M.1980. The hydrophone‐pinger experiment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68, 1403–1408.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BuckinghamM.J.2007. On pore‐fluid viscosity and the wave properties of saturated granular materials including marine sediments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America122, 1486.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BuckinghamM.J.2010. Response to comments ‘On pore fluid viscosity and the wave properties of saturated granular materials including marine sediments’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America127, 2095–2098.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DettmerJ., DossoS.E. and HollandC.W.2011. Trans‐dimensional geoacoustic inversion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America128, 3393–3405.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DettmerJ., HollandC.W. and DossoS.E.2013. Trans‐dimensional uncertainty estimation for dispersive seabed sediments. Geophysics78, WB63–WB76.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DixC.H.1955. Seismic velocities from surface measurements. Geophysics20, 68–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. EmeryK.O. and KuhnG.G.1982. Sea cliffs: their processes, profiles, and classifications. Geological Society of America Bulletin93, 644–654.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GreenP.J.1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model. Biometrika82, 711–732.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GoffJ.A., AustinJ.A.Jr., GulickS., NordfjordS., ChristensenB., SommerfieldC., et al. 2005. Recent and modern marine erosion on the New Jersey outer shelf. Marine Geology216, 275–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HamiltonE.L.1980. Geoacoustic modeling of the seafloor. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68, 1313–1340.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HollandC.W.2003. Seabed reflection measurement uncertainty. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America114, 1861–1873.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HollandC.W.2012. Evidence for a common scale O(0.1) m that controls seabed scattering and reverberation in shallow water. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America132, 2232–2238.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HollandC.W. and BrunsonB.A.1988. The biot/stoll sediment model: an experimental assessment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America84, 1437–1443.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HollandC.W. and DettmerJ.2013. In‐situ sediment dispersion estimates in the presence of discrete layers and gradients. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America133, 50–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HollandC.W. and OslerJ.2000. High resolution geoacoustic inversion in shallow water: a joint time and frequency domain technique. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America107, 1263–1279.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HollandC.W., SteiningerG. and DossoS.2015. Discrimination between discrete and continuum scattering from the sub‐seafloor. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America138, 663–673.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HollandK.T. and ElmoreP.A.2008. A review of heterogeneous sediments in coastal environments. Earth Science Reviews89, 116–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KermabonA.N., BlavierP.I., CortisV. and DelauzeH.E.1966. The “sphincter” corer: a wide diameter corer with watertight core‐catcher. Marine Geology1, 149–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. KimuraM.2011. Velocity dispersion and attenuation in granular marine sediments: Comparison of measurements with predictions using acoustic models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America129, 3544–3561.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. LucasA.S., McCannC. and SothcottJ.2001. Low frequency acoustic characterization of unconsolidated sediment samples. EAGE 63rd Conference and Technical Exhibition, P035, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  27. MagagnoliA. and MengoliM.1995. Carotiere a Gravita SW‐104, Rapporto Technico 27, CNR – Instituto per la Geologia Marina. Bologna.
  28. MaxM.D., MichelozziM.T. and TonarelliB.A.1996. Weichselian low stand beach terrace at‐l 3 lm in the southern Adventure Bank, off SW Sicily. Geological Society of London Special Publication, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. MedwinH. and ClayC.S.1998. Fundamentals of Acoustical Oceanography, pp. 265–267. Academic Press, San Diego.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. O'DonnellM., JaynesE.T. and MillerJ.G. 1981. Kramers–Kronig relationship between ultrasonic attenuation and phase velocity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America69, 696–701.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. OslerJ. and AlganO.1999. A high resolution seismic sequence analysis of the Malta Plateau. NATO Undersea Research Centre Report SR‐311.
  32. SambridgeM., GallagherK., JacksonA. and RickwoodP.2006. Transdimensional inverse problems, model comparison and the evidence, Geophysical Journal International167, 528–542.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SchwartzL. and PlonaT.J.1984. Ultrasonic propagation in close‐packed disordered suspensions. Journal of Applied Physics55, 3971–3977.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. SteiningerG., DossoS., HollandC.W. and DettmerJ.2014. Estimating seabed scattering mechanisms via Bayesian model selection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America136, 1552–1562.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12081
Loading
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12081
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Inversion; Reflection; Velocity

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error