1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 18, Issue 4
  5. Article
Geoelectrical Monitoring
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604
PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT

To improve risk assessment, control and treatment strategies of contaminated sites, we require accurate methods for monitoring solute transport and infiltration in the unsaturated zone. Highly spatio‐temporal heterogeneous infiltration during snowmelt increases the risk of contaminating the groundwater in areas where de‐icing chemicals are required for winter maintenance of roads and runways. The objective of this study is to quantify how the different processes occurring during snowmelt infiltration of contaminated meltwater affect bulk electrical resistivity. Field experiments conducted at Moreppen experimental lysimeter trench are combined with heterogeneous unsaturated soil modelling. The experimental site is located next to Oslo airport, Gardermoen, Norway, where large amounts of de‐icing chemicals are used to remove snow and ice every winter. Bromide, an inactive tracer, and the de‐icing chemical propylene glycol were applied to the snow cover prior to the onset of snowmelt, and their percolation through the unsaturated zone was monitored with water sampling from 37 suction cups. At the same time, cross‐borehole time‐lapse electrical resistivity measurements were recorded along with measurements of soil water tension and temperature. Images of two‐dimensional (2D) bulk resistivity profiles were determined and were temperature corrected, to compensate for the change in soil temperature throughout the melting period. By using fitted parameters of petrophysical relations for the Moreppen soil, the tensiometer data gave insight into the contribution of water saturation on the changes in bulk resistivity, while water samples provided the contribution to the bulk resistivity from salt concentrations. The experimental data were compared with numerical simulation of the same experimental conditions in a heterogeneous unsaturated soil and used to quantify the uncertainty caused by the non‐consistent resolutions of the different methods, and to increase our understanding of the resistivity signal measured with time‐lapse electrical resistivity tomography. The work clearly illustrates the importance of ground truthing in multiple locations to obtain an accurate description of the contaminant transport.

© 2020 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2020 The Authors. Near Surface Geophysics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12112
2020-07-04
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12112
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nsg/18/4/nsg12112.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12112&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Archie, G.E. (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 146, 54–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Binley, A. (2015) Tools and techniques: DC electrical methods. In: G.Schubert (Ed.) Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edition. Burlington: Elsevier, Vol. 11, pp. 233–259, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53802-4.00192-5
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Binley, A., Hubbard, S. S., Huisman, J. A., Revil, A., Robinson, D. A., Singha, K.et al. (2015) The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales. Water Resource Research, 51, 3837–3866. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017016
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cassiani, G., Bruno, V., Villa, A., Fusi, N. and Binley, A. (2006) A saline trace test monitored via time‐lapse surface electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Geophysics, 59(3), 244–259.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chambers, J.E., Gunn, D.A., Wilkinson, P.B., Meldrum, P.I., Haslam, E., Holyoake, S.et al. (2014). 4D electrical resistivity tomography monitoring of soil moisture dynamics in an operational railway embankment. Near Surface Geophysics, 12, 61–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Feng, S. and Sen, N.P. (1985) Geometrical model of conductive and dielectric properties of partially saturated rocks. Journal of Applied Physics, 58, 3226–3243.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Forquet, N. (2009) Two‐phase flow modelling of vertical flow filters for wastewater treatment. PhD thesis, University of Strasbourg, France.
  8. French, H.K., Swensen, B., Englund, J.‐O., Meyer, K.‐F. and van der Zee, S.E.A.T.M. (1994). A lysimeter trench for reactive pollutant transport studies. In: Soveri, J. and Suokko, T. (eds.) Future Groundwater Resources at Risk. International Association of Hydrogeological Science (IAHS), 13–16 June. Helsinki: Finland IAHS Publication. Vol. 222, pp. 131–138.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. French, H.K. and Van der Zee, S.E.A.T.M (1999) Field scale observations of small scale spatial variability of snowmelt drainage and infiltration, Nordic Hydrology, 30, 166–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. French, H.K., Van der Zee, S.E.A.T.M. and Leijnse, A. (2001). Transport and degradation of propyleneglycol and potassium acetate in the unsaturated zone. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 49, 23–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. French, H.K., Hardbattle, C., Binley, A., Winship, P. and Jakobsen, L. (2002) Monitoring snowmelt induced unsaturated flow and transport using electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Hydrology, 267, 273–284.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. French, H.K. and Binley, A. (2004) Snowmelt infiltration: monitoring temporal and spatial variability using time‐lapse electrical resistivity. Journal of Hydrology, 297(1–4), 174–186.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Geuzaine, C. and Remacle, J.‐F. (2009) Gmsh: a three‐dimensional finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 79, 1309–1331.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayley, K., Bentley, L., Gharibi, M. and Nightingale, M. (2007). Low temperature dependence of electrical resistivity: Implications for near surface geophysical monitoring. Geophysical Research Letters, 34, 18. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031124.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hubbard, S.S. and RubinY. (2000) Hydrogeological parameter estimation using geophysical data: a review of selected techniques. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 45, 3–34
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Jørgensen, P. and Østmo, S.R. (1990). Hydrogeology in the Romerike area, southern Norway. NGU Bulletins, 418, 19–26
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kemna, A., Binley, A., Day‐Lewis, F., Englert, A., Tezkan, B., Vanderborght, J.et al. (2006) Solute transport processes. In: VereeckenH., Binley, A., Cassiani, G., Revil, A., and Titov, K.Applied Hydrogeophysics. NATO Science Series, IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer, Vol. 71, pp. 117–160.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Köestel, J., Kemna, A., Javaux, M., Binley, A. and Vereecken, H. (2008) Quantitative imaging of solute transport in an unsaturated and undisturbed soil monolith with 3D ERT and TDR. Water Resources Research, 44, W12411. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006755.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Krautblatter, M., Verleysdonk, S., Flores‐Orozco, A. and Kemna, A. (2010) Temperature‐calibrated imaging of seasonal changes in permafrost rock walls by quantitative electrical resistivity tomography (Zugspitze, German/Austrian Alps). Journal of Geophysical Research, 115(F2), 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Lesmes, D.P. and Friedman, S.P. (2005) Relationships the electrical and hydrogeological properties of rocks and soils. In: Rubin, Y. and HubbardS.S. (Eds.) Hydrogeophysics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 87–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Llera, F.J., Sato, M., Nakatsuka, K. and Yokoyama, H. (1990). Temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity of water‐saturated rocks. Geophysics, 55(5), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442869.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Miller, E.E. and Miller, R. D. (1956). Physical theory for capillary flow phenomena. Journal of Applied Physics, 27, 324–332.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Mualem, Y. and Friedman, S.P. (1991) Theoretical prediction of electrical conductivity in saturated and unsaturated soil. Water Resource Research, 27, 2771–2777.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Pedersen, T.S. (1994) Væsketransport i Umettet sone, stratigrafisk beskrivelse av toppsedimentene på forskningsfeltet, Moreppen, og bestemmelse av tilh¢rede hydrauliske parametre [Flow in the unsaturated zone, stratigraphic description of the top sediments at the research station, Moreppen, and the determination of hydraulic parameters]. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Geology, University of Oslo, pp. 1–122
  25. Rein, A., Hoffmann, R., and Dietrich, P. (2004). Influence of natural time‐dependent variations of electrical conductivity on DC resistivity measurements. Journal of Hydrology, 285, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.08.015.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Šimůnek, J., van Genuchten, M. Th. and Šejna, M. (2016) Recent developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages. Vadose Zone Journal, 15(7), 25. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0033.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Tuttle, K.J. (1997) Sedimentological and hydrogeological characterisation of a raised ice‐contact delta— the Preboreal delta‐complex at Gardermoen, southeastern Norway. PhD thesis, Department of Geology, University of Oslo.
  28. Tso, C.‐H.M., Kuras, O., Wilkinson, P.B., Uhlemann, S., Chambers, J.E., Meldrum, P.I.et al. (2017) Improved characterisation and modelling of measurement errors in electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) surveys. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 146, 103–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Uhlemann, S., Chambers, J., Wilkinson, P., Maurer, H., Merritt, A., Meldrum, P.et al. (2017) Four‐dimensional imaging of moisture dynamics during landslide reactivation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 122(1), 398–418.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Genuchten, M. Th. (1980) A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 892–898.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. VereeckenH., Binley, A., Cassiani, G., Revil, A., and Titov, K.2006Applied Hydrogeophysics. Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 71, Dordrecht: Springer, 383 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Winship, P., Binley, A. and Gomez, D. (2006) Flow and transport in the unsaturated Sherwood Sandstone: characterization using cross‐borehole geophysical methods. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 263, 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.263.01.12.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu, Y., Nakagawa, S., Kneafsey, T.J., Dafflon, B., and Hubbard, S. (2017) Electrical and seismic response of saline permafrost soil during freeze–thaw transition. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 146, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.08.008.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12112
Loading
Towards understanding time‐lapse electrical resistivity signals measured during contaminated snowmelt infiltration
Near Surface Geophysics 18, 399 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12112
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12112
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12112
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Electrical resistivity tomography; Groundwater; Hydrogeology; Hydrogeophysics; Water saturation

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error