Matrix‐free crosshole elliptical‐anisotropy tomography: parametrization analysis and ground‐penetrating radar applications in carbonates

References

1. Alkhalifah, T. and Plessix, R. (2014) A recipe for practical full‐waveform inversion in anisotropic media: an analytical parameter resolution study. Geophysics, 79(3), R91–R101.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Asnaashari, A., Brossier, R., Garambois, S., Audebert, F., Thore, P. and Virieux, J. (2013) Regularized seismic full waveform inversion with prior model information. Geophysics, 78(2), R25–R36.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berryman, J.G. (1989) Weighted least‐squares criteria for seismic traveltime tomography. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 27(3), 302–309.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bouaziz, I. (2015) Etude d'une carotte de la plateforme urgonienne du vaucluse: Approches sédimentologie, pétrophysique et numérique. Master's Thesis, Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, Pau.
5. Carcione, J. and Cavallini, F. (1995) On the acoustic‐electromagnetic analogy. Wave Motion, 21, 149–162.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cerveny, V. (1985) Ray synthetic seismograms for complex two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional structures. Journal of Geophysics, 58(2), 26.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cheng, Y. and Wang, Z. (2014) A new discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for directly solving the Hamilton–Jacobi equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 268, 134–153.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Crandall, M.G. and Lions, P.L. (1983) Viscosity solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi equations. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 277(1), 1–42.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dafflon, B., Irving, J. and Barrash, W. (2011) Inversion of multiple intersecting high‐resolution crosshole GPR profiles for hydrological characterization at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 73(4), 305–314.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gholami, Y., Brossier, R., Operto, S., Ribodetti, A. and Virieux, J. (2013) Which parametrization is suitable for acoustic VTI full waveform inversion? art 1: sensitivity and trade‐off analysis. Geophysics, 78(2), R81–R105.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Giroux, B. and Gloaguen, E. (2012) Geostatistical traveltime tomography in elliptically anisotropic media. Geophysical Prospecting, 60(6), 1133–1149.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gloaguen, E., Marcotte, D., Chouteau, M. and Perroud, H. (2005) Borehole radar velocity inversion using cokriging and cosimulation. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 57, 242–259.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hale, D. (2007) Local dip filtering with directional laplacians. Centre for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines. Technical report.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hanafy, S. and Al Hagrey, S. (2005) Ground‐penetrating radar tomography for soil‐moisture heterogeneity. Geophysics, 71(1), K9–K18.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hunziker, J., Laloy, E. and Linde, N. (2017) Inference of multi‐gaussian relative permittivity fields by probabilistic inversion of crosshole ground‐penetrating radar data. Geophysics, 82(5), H25–H40.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ikelle, L.T. (2012) On elastic‐electromagnetic mathematical equivalences. Geophysical Journal International, 189(3), 1771–1780.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Irving, J., Knoll, M. and Knight, R. (2007) Improving crosshole radar velocity tomograms: a new approach to incorporating high‐angle traveltime data. Geophysics, 72(4).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Le Bouteiller, P. (2018) Eulerian approach of Hamilton–Jacobi equation with a discontinuous Galerkin method in heterogeneous anisotropic medium: Application to seismic imaging. PhD thesis, University Grenoble Alpes.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Le Bouteiller, P., Benjemaa, M., Métivier, L. and Virieux, J. (2018) An accurate discontinuous Galerkin method for solving point–source Eikonal equation in 2‐D heterogeneous anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International, 212(3), 1498–1522.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Le Bouteiller, P., Benjemaa, M., Métivier, L. and Virieux, J. (2019) A discontinuous galerkin fast‐sweeping Eikonal solver for fast and accurate traveltime computation in 3D tilted anisotropic media. Geophysics, 84(2), C107–C118.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Leung, S. and Qian, J. (2006) An adjoint state method for three‐dimensional transmission traveltime tomography using first‐arrivals. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 4(1), 249–266.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Métivier, L. and Brossier, R. (2016) The seiscope optimization toolbox: a large‐scale nonlinear optimization library based on reverse communication. Geophysics, 81(2), F11–F25.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nocedal, J. (1980) Updating quasi‐Newton matrices with limited storage. Mathematics of Computation, 35(151), 773–782.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Operto, S., Virieux, J., Ribodetti, A. and Anderson, J.E. (2009) Finite‐difference frequency‐domain modeling of visco‐acoustic wave propagation in two‐dimensional TTI media. Geophysics, 74(5), T75–T95.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Paige, C.C. and Saunders, M.A. (1982) ALGORITHM 583 LSQR: sparse linear equations and least squares problems. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 8(2), 195–209.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pinard, H., Garambois, S., Métivier, L., Dietrich, M., Sénéchal, G. and Rousset, D. (2016) Full‐waveform inversion of gpr data acquired between boreholes in Rustrel carbonates. In: Coulié, K., Micolau, G. and Febvre, P. (Eds.) E3S Web of Conferences: Inter‐Disciplinary Underground Science & Technology (i‐DUST 2016), Avignon, France, Vol. 12.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Plessix, R.E. (2006) A review of the adjoint‐state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International, 167(2), 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Podvin, P. and Lecomte, I. (1991) Finite difference computation of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity model: a massively parallel approach and its associated tools. Geophysical Journal International, 105, 271–284.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Taillandier, C., Noble, M., Chauris, H. and Calandra, H. (2009) First‐arrival travel time tomography based on the adjoint state method. Geophysics, 74(6), WCB1–WCB10.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Tavakoli, B., Operto, S., Ribodetti, A. and Virieux, J. (2019) Matrix‐free anisotropic slope tomography: theory and application. Geophysics, 84(1), R35–R57.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Thomsen, L.A. (1986) Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics, 51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Tikhonov, A. and Arsenin, V. (1977) Solution of Ill‐Posed Problems. Winston, Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Trinh, P.T., Brossier, R., Métivier, L., Virieux, J. and Wellington, P. (2017) Bessel smoothing filter for spectral element mesh. Geophysical Journal International, 209(3), 1489–1512.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Vasco, D.W., PetersonJr., J.E. and Lee, K.H. (1997) Ground‐penetrating radar velocity tomography in heterogeneous and anisotropic media. Geophysics, 62(6), 1758–1773.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Waheed, U.B., Flagg, G. and Yarman, C.E. (2016) First‐arrival traveltime tomography for anisotropic media using the adjoint‐state method. Geophysics, 81(4), R147–R155.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wellington, P., Brossier, R., Hamitou, O., Trinh, P. and Virieux, J. (2017) Efficient anisotropic dip filtering via inverse correlation functions. Geophysics, 82(4), A31–A35.
    [Google Scholar]