1887
Volume 67 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Although narrow‐azimuth towed‐streamer data provide good image quality for structural interpretation, it is generally accepted that for wide‐azimuth marine surveys seabed receivers deliver superior seismic reflection measurements and seismically derived reservoir attributes. However, seabed surveys are not widely used due to the higher acquisition costs when compared to streamer acquisition. In recent years, there have been significant engineering efforts to automate receiver deployment and retrieval in order to minimize the cost differential and conduct cost‐efficient seabed receiver seismic surveys. These engineering efforts include industrially engineered nodes, nodes on a rope deployment schemes and even robotic nodes, which swim to and from the deployment location. This move to automation is inevitable, leading to robotization of seismic data acquisition for exploration and development activities in the oil and gas industry. We are developing a robotic‐based technology, which utilizes autonomous underwater vehicles as seismic sensors without the need of using a remotely operated vehicle for deployment and retrieval. In this paper, we describe the autonomous underwater vehicle evolution throughout the project years from initial heavy and bulky nodes to fully autonomous light and flexible underwater receivers. Results obtained from two field pilot tests using different generations of autonomous underwater vehicles indicate that the seismic coupling, and navigation based on underwater acoustics are very reliable and robust.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12670
2018-07-29
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BeasleyC.J.2008. A new look at marine simultaneous sources. The Leading Edge27, 914–917.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BerkhoutA.J.2008. Changing the mindset in seismic data acquisition. The Leading Edge27,924‐938.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BetzJ.2015. Advances needed to untether AUVs from support vessels. Journal of Petroleum Technology67, 50–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BlacquiereG. and BerkhoutG.2013. Robotization in seismic acquisition. 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 12–16.
  5. CampbellJ.K., KinnearS. and ThameA.2015. AUV technology for seabed characterization and geohazards assessment. The Leading Edge2, 170–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HollowayA. and GrantD.2016. Using robotic flying nodes for seabed seismic data. EAGE 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, WS 18.
  7. HoweD., FosterM., AllenT., TaylorB. and JackI.2008. Independent simultaneous sweeping – a method to increase the productivity of land seismic crews. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 2826–2830.
  8. JamiesonJ. and WilsonL.2015. Effective launch and recovery of autonomous underwayer vehicles. Offshore Technology Conference—25664‐MS, Houston TX.
  9. MoldoveanuN., CombeeL., MuyzertE., PaiS. and CaprioliP.2016. Marine seismic acquisition with 3D sensor arrays towed by wave gliders. 86th Annual International Meeting, SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 168–172.
  10. OurabahA., GrimshawM., KegginJ., Kowalczyk‐KedzierskaM., StoneJ., MurrayE. et al. 2014. Acquiring and imaging ultra‐high density land seismic data – practical challenges and the impact of spatial sampling. 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  11. TsingasC., Al‐AliM., WalkerC., BuntingT., PosticE., RokkanA. et al. 2017. SpiceRack™: an autonomous underwater vehicle for efficient seabed seismic acquisition. SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting.
  12. TsingasC., KelamisP.G., BrizardT. and GrimsdaleJ.2013. Automation in geophysical data acquisition: from ocean‐bottom nodes to RoboNodes. The Leading Edge32, 514–520.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. TsingasC., KimY. and YooJ.2016. Broadband acquisition, deblending and imaging employing dispersed source arrays. The Leading Edge35, 354–360.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. WilcoxS.2015b. Drone support seismic acquisition. E&P Magazine June 2015, 67–69
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12670
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12670
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acoustic Positioning; Automation; Autonomous Underwater Vehicles; Robotics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error