1887
Volume 67 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Pneumatic seismic sources, commonly known as airguns, have been serving us well for decades, but there is an increasing need for sources with improved low‐frequency signal and reduced environmental impact. In this paper, we present a new pneumatic source that is designed to achieve these goals by operating with lower pressures and larger volumes. The new source will release more air creating larger bubbles with longer bubble periods than airguns. The release of the air will be tuned so that the rise time will be longer and the sound pressure level and its slope will be lower. Certain engineering features will eliminate cavitation. Larger bubbles increase low‐frequency content of the signal, longer rise times decrease mid‐frequency content and the elimination of cavitation reduces high‐frequency content. We have not yet built a full‐scale version of the new source. However, we have manufactured a small‐scale low‐pressure source incorporating most of the engineering features, and tested it in a lake. Here, we present the lake data that, as expected, show a significant reduction in the sound pressure level, increase in rise time, decrease in slope and decrease in high‐frequency content while maintaining the same low‐frequency content when the source prototype is operated at low pressure compared with high pressure. Synthetic data produced by numerical modelling of the full‐scale proposed pneumatic source suggest that the new source will improve the low‐frequency content and can produce geophysically useful signal down to 1 Hz.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12774
2019-04-26
2020-07-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BabuV.2014. Fundamentals of Gas Dynamics, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BarkerD. and LandrøM.2014. An alternative method for modeling close‐range interactions between air guns. Geophysics79, P1–P7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BiondiB. and AlmominA.2013. Tomographic full‐waveform inversion (TFWI) by combining FWI and wave‐equation migration velocity analysis. The Leading Edge32, 1074–1080.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChelminskiS.1961. Acoustic wave impulse generator repeater. US Patent 3249177 A.
  5. ChelminskiS.2013. Marine vibratory sound source for beneath water seismic exploration. US Patent 8570835 B2.
  6. ChelminskiS.2016. Device for marine seismic explorations for deposits. US Patent 8971152 B2.
  7. ChelminskiS.2017. Method and apparatus for tuning the rise time of the initial pulse of an airgun. US Patent 9804280 B2.
  8. ColeR.H.1948. Underwater Explosions. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. de GraafK.L., PenesisI. and BrandnerP.A.2014. Modelling of seismic airgun bubble dynamics and pressure field using the Gilmore equation with additional damping factors. Ocean Engineering76, 32–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DellingerJ., RossA., MeauxD., BrendersA., GesoffG., EtgenJ. et al. 2016. Wolfspar, an “FWI‐friendly” ultralow‐frequency marine seismic source. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 4891–4895.
  11. DragosetB.2000. Introduction to air guns and air‐gun arrays. The Leading Edge19, 892–897.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HaldorsenJ., DeslerF. and ChuD.1985. Use of vibrators in a marine seismic source. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 509–511.
  13. HampsonG. and JakubowiczH.1990. Effects of source and receiver motion on seismic data. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 859–862.
  14. HerringC.1941. Theory of the pulsations of the gas bubble produced by an underwater explosion. Office of Scientific Research and Development report 236.
  15. JenningsJ. and RonenS.2017. Simultaneous source deblending with the radiality and source‐similarity attributes. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 4909–4913.
  16. LandrøM., AmundsenL. and BarkerD.2011. High‐frequency signals from air gun arrays. Geophysics71, Q19–Q27.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LandrøM., NiY. and AmundsenL.2016. Reducing high‐frequency ghost cavitation signals from marine air‐gun arrays. Geophysics81, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LawsR.M., HattonL. and HaartsenM.1990. Computer modelling of clustered air guns. First Break8, 331–338.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LiG.F., CaoM.Q., ChenH.L. and NiC.Z.2010. Modeling air gun signature in marine seismic exploration considering multiple physical factors. Applied Geophysics7, 158–165.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. NossT., RonenS., JenkersonM., AllenP., HouckR. and JohnsonG.1999. Marine vibrator motion correction in the frequency‐space domain. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1142–1145.
  21. PramikB., Lee BellM., GrierA. and LindsayA.2015. Field testing the AquaVib: an alternate marine seismic source. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 181–185.
  22. RayleighL.1917. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Philosophical Magazine Series6, 94–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SchostakB. and JenkersonM.2015. The marine vibrator joint industry project. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 4961–4962.
  24. ShumizuS., TsukudaK., ShibataH., MizotaA. and MiuraS.2009. Short cluster airgun array for shallow to deep crustal survey. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering19, 60–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. StrandenesA. and VaageS.1992. Signatures from clustered airguns. First Break10, 305–312.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ten KroodeF., BerglerS., CorstenC., de MaageJ.W., StrijbosF. and TijhofH.2013. Broadband seismic data – the importance of low frequencies. Geophysics, 78, WA3–WA14.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. VokurkaK.1986. Comparison of Rayleigh's, Herring's, and Gilmore's modeling of gas bubbles. Acta Acustica united with Acustic59, 214–219.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. WarnerM., GuaschL. and YaoG.2015. Adaptive waveform inversion – FWI without cycle skipping. 2015 Workshop: Depth Model Building: Full‐waveform Inversion, Beijing, China, 18–19 June 2015, 11–14.
  29. WatsonL.M., DunhamE.M. and RonenS.2016. Numerical modeling of seismic airguns and low‐pressure sources. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 219–224.
  30. WatsonL.M., RonenS., GoldbogenJ. and DunhamE.M.2017. Comparing whales to marine seismic sources: low‐frequency sound generation by fin whales. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 90–95.
  31. WillisH.F.1941. Underwater explosions: the time interval between successive explosions. British Report WA‐47‐21.
  32. ZiolkowskiA.1970. A method for calculating the output pressure waveform from an air gun. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society21, 137–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. ZiolkowskiA.M., HanssenP., GatliffR., LiX. and JakubowiczH.2001. The use of low frequencies for sub‐basalt imaging. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 74–77.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12774
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12774
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acquisition and Seismics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error