1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 68, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 68, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Cadzow filtering is currently considered as one of the most effective approaches for seismic data reconstruction. The basic version of Cadzow filtering first reorders each frequency slice of the seismic data (to be reconstructed) to a block Hankel/Toeplitz matrix, and then implements a rank‐reduction operator, that is truncated singular value decomposition, to the Hankel/Toeplitz matrix. However, basic Cadzow filtering cannot deal with the problem of recovering regularly missing data (up‐sampling) in the case of strongly aliased energy, because the regularly missing data will mix with signals in the singular spectrum. To solve this problem, it has been proposed to precondition the reconstruction of high‐frequency components using information from the low‐frequency components which are less aliased. In this paper, we further extend the de‐aliased Cadzow filtering approach to reconstruct regularly sampled seismic traces from the noisy observed data by modifying the reinserting operation, in which the high‐frequency components are projected onto the sub‐space spanned by several singular vectors of the low‐frequency components. At each iteration, the filtered data are weighted to the original data as a feedback. The weighting factor is related to the background noise level and changes with iteration. The feasibility of the proposed technique is validated via two‐dimensional, three‐dimensional and five‐dimensional synthetic data examples, as well as two‐dimensional post‐stack and three‐dimensional pre‐stack field data examples. The results demonstrate that the proposed technique can effectively interpolate regularly sampled data and is robust in noisy environments.

© 2020 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2019 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12867
2019-09-19
2024-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12867
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AnvariR., SiahsarM.A.N., GholtashiS., KahooA.R. and MohammadiM.2017. Seismic random noise attenuation using synchrosqueezed wavelet transform and low‐rank signal matrix approximation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing55, 6574–6581.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. CaoJ., WangY. and WangB.2014. Accelerating seismic interpolation with a gradient projection method based on tight frame property of curvelet. Exploration Geophysics46, 253.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. CaoJ. and ZhaoJ.2017. Simultaneous seismic interpolation and denoising based on sparse inversion with a 3d low redundancy curvelet transform. Exploration Geophysics48, 422–429.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. CheminguiN.1996. Handling the irregular geometry in wide‐azimuth surveys. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 2106.
  5. ChenX., WangR., HuangW., JiangY. and YinC.2018a. Clustering‐based stress inversion from focal mechanisms in microseismic monitoring of hydrofracturing. Geophysical Journal International215, 1887–1899.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. ChenY., HuangW., ZhangD. and ChenW.2016a. An open‐source matlab code package for improved rank‐reduction 3D seismic data denoising and reconstruction. Computers & Geosciences95, 59–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. ChenY., HuangW., ZhouY., LiuW. and ZhangD.2018b. Plane‐wave orthogonal polynomial transform for amplitude‐preserving noise attenuation. Geophysical Journal International214, 2207–2223.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. ChenY., ZhangD., JinZ., ChenX., ZuS., HuangW.et al. 2016b. Simultaneous denoising and reconstruction of 5‐D seismic data via damped rank‐reduction method. Geophysical Journal International206, 1695–1717.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. ChenY., ZhouY., ChenW., ZuS., HuangW. and ZhangD.2017. Empirical low‐rank approximation for seismic noise attenuation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing55, 4696–4711.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. ChengJ. and SacchiM.D.2015. A fast rank‐reduction algorithm for 3D deblending via randomized QR decomposition. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 3830–3835.
  11. FomelS. and LiuY.2010. Seislet transform and seislet frame. Geophysics75, V25–V38.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. GanS., WangS., ChenY., ChenX., HuangW. and ChenH.2016. Compressive sensing for seismic data reconstruction via fast projection onto convex sets based on seislet transform. Journal of Applied Geophysics130, 194–208.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. GaoJ., ChengJ. and SacchiM.D.2017. Five‐dimensional seismic reconstruction using parallel square matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing55, 2124–2135.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. GaoJ., SacchiM.D. and ChenX.2013. A fast reduced‐rank interpolation method for prestack seismic volumes that depend on four spatial dimensions. Geophysics78, V21–V30.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. GholamiA.2015. Non‐convex compressed sensing with frequency mask for seismic data reconstruction and denoising. Geophysical Prospecting62, 1389–1405.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. GolubG.H. and LoanC.F.V.1996. Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. GongX., WangS. and DuL. 2018. Seismic data reconstruction using a sparsity‐promoting apex shifted hyperbolic radon‐curvelet transform. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica62, 450–465.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. HerrmannF.J. and HennenfentG.2008. Non‐parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames. Geophysical Journal International173, 233–248.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. HuangW., WangR., ChenX. and ChenY.2017a. Double least‐squares projections method for signal estimation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing55, 4111–4129.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. HuangW., WangR., ChenY., LiH. and GanS.2016. Damped multichannel singular spectrum analysis for 3D random noise attenuation. Geophysics81, V261–V270.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. HuangW., WangR., YuanY., GanS. and ChenY.2017b. Signal extraction using randomized‐order multichannel singular spectrum analysis. Geophysics82, V69–V84.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. HuangW., WuR.S. and WangR.2018. Damped dreamlet representation for exploration seismic data interpolation and denoising. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing56, 3159–3172.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. LatifA. and MousaW.A.2017. An efficient undersampled high‐resolution radon transform for exploration seismic data processing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing55, 1010–1024.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. LiC., HuangJ.P., LiZ.C. and WangR.R.2017a. Regularized least‐squares migration of simultaneous‐source seismic data with adaptive singular spectrum analysis. Petroleum Science14, 61–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. LiK., YinX.Y. and ZongZ.Y.2017b. Bayesian seismic multi‐scale inversion in complex Laplace mixed domains. Petroleum Science14, 694–710.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. LibertyE., WoolfeF., MartinssonP.‐G., RokhlinV. and TygertM.2007. Randomized algorithms for the low‐rank approximation of matrices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences104, 20167–20172.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. MousaviS.M., LangstonC.A. and HortonS.P.2016. Automatic microseismic denoising and onset detection using the synchrosqueezed continuous wavelet transform. Geophysics81, V341–V355.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. NaghizadehM. and SacchiM.2010. Seismic data reconstruction using multidimensional prediction filters. Geophysical Prospecting58, 157–173.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. NaghizadehM. and SacchiM.2013. Multidimensional de‐aliased cadzow reconstruction of seismic records. Geophysics78, A1–A5.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. NaghizadehM. and SacchiM.D.2007. Multistep autoregressive reconstruction of seismic records. Geophysics72, V111–V118.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Nazari SiahsarM.A., GholtashiS., KahooA.R., ChenW. and ChenY.2017. Data‐driven multitask sparse dictionary learning for noise attenuation of 3d seismic data. Geophysics82, V385–V396.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Nazari SiahsarM.A., GholtashiS., KahooA.R., MarviH. and AhmadifardA.2016. Sparse time‐frequency representation for seismic noise reduction using low‐rank and sparse decomposition. Geophysics81, V117–V124.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. OropezaV. and SacchiM.2011. Simultaneous seismic data denoising and reconstruction via multichannel singular spectrum analysis. Geophysics76, V25–V32.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. PorsaniM.J.1999. Seismic trace interpolation using half‐step prediction filters. Geophysics64, 1461–1467.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. RonenJ.1987. Wave‐equation trace interpolation. Geophysics52, 973–984.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. SacchiM.D.2009. FX singular spectrum analysis: CSPG CSEG CWLS Convention, Calgary, Canada, 392–395.
  37. SiahsarM.A.N., GholtashiS., TorshiziE.O., ChenW. and ChenY.2017. Simultaneous denoising and interpolation of 3‐D seismic data via damped data‐driven optimal singular value shrinkage. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters14, 1086–1090.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. SpitzS.1991. Seismic trace interpolation in the fx domain. Geophysics56, 785–794.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. TradD.O., UlrychT.J. and SacchiM.D.2002. Accurate interpolation with high‐resolution time‐variant radon transforms. Geophysics67, 644–656.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. TrickettS.2008. F‐xy cadzow noise suppression. 78th SEG Annual International meeting, Extended Abstracts, 2586–2590.
  41. TrickettS., BurroughsL. and MiltonA.2012. Robust rank‐reduction filtering for erratic noise. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 1–5.
  42. WangY., CaoJ. and YangC.2011. Recovery of seismic wavefields based on compressive sensing by an l1‐norm constrained trust region method and the piecewise random subsampling. Geophysical Journal International187, 199–213.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. WuR.‐S., GengY. and WuB.2011. Physical wavelet defined on an observation plane and the dreamlet: 81th SEG Annual International meeting, Extended Abstracts, 3835–3839.
  44. ZhangY.Y., JinZ.J., ChenY.Q., LiuX.W., HanL. and JinW.J.2018. Pre‐stack seismic density inversion in marine shale reservoirs in the southern jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin, China. Petroleum Science15, 484–497.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. ZwartjesP. and GisolfA.2007. Fourier reconstruction with sparse inversion. Geophysical Prospecting55, 199–221.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12867
Loading
De‐aliased and de‐noise Cadzow filtering for seismic data reconstruction
Geophysical Prospecting 68, 553 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12867
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12867
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12867
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Cadzow filtering; De‐aliasing; De‐noise; Seismic reconstruction; Up‐sampling

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error