1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 68, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 68 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT

As mineral exploration seeks deeper targets, there will be a greater reliance on geophysical data and a better understanding of the geological meaning of the responses will be required, and this must be achieved with less geological control from drilling. Also, exploring based on the mineral system concept requires particular understanding of geophysical responses associated with altered rocks. Where petrophysical datasets of adequate sample size and measurement quality are available, physical properties show complex variations, reflecting the combined effects of various geological processes. Large datasets, analysed as populations, are required to understand the variations. We recommend the display of petrophysical data as frequency histograms because the nature of the data distribution is easily seen with this form of display. A petrophysical dataset commonly contains a combination of overlapping sub‐populations, influenced by different geological factors. To understand the geological controls on physical properties in hard rock environments, it is necessary to analyse the petrophysical data not only in terms of the properties of different rock types. It is also necessary to consider the effects of processes such as alteration, weathering, metamorphism and strain, and variables such as porosity and stratigraphy. To address this complexity requires that much more supporting geological information be acquired than in current practice. The widespread availability of field portable instruments means quantitative geochemical and mineralogical data can now be readily acquired, making it unnecessary to rely primarily on categorical rock classification schemes. The petrophysical data can be combined with geochemical, petrological and mineralogical data to derive explanations for observed physical property variations based not only on rigorous rock classification methods, but also in combination with quantitative estimates of alteration and weathering. To understand how geological processes will affect different physical properties, it is useful to define three end‐member forms of behaviour. Bulk behaviour depends on the physical properties of the dominant mineral components. Density and, to a lesser extent, seismic velocity show such behaviour. Grain and texture behaviour occur when minor components of the rock are the dominate controls on its physical properties. Grain size and shape control grain properties, and for texture properties the relative positions of these grains are also important. Magnetic and electrical properties behave in this fashion. Thinking in terms of how geological processes change the key characteristics of the major and minor mineralogical components allows the resulting changes in physical properties to be understood and anticipated.

© 2020 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2019 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12882
2019-12-10
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12882
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/68/1/gpr12882.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12882&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. AguilefS., Araya VargasJ. and YanezG.2017. Relationship between bulk mineralogy and induced polarisation responses in iron oxide‐copper‐gold and porphyry copper mineralisation, northern Chile. Exploration Geophysics48, 353–362.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AnselmettiF.S. and EberliG.P.1997. Sonic velocity in carbonate sediments and rocks. In: Carbonate Seismology (eds I.Palaz and K.J.Marfurt), pp. 53–74. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AustinJ., GeunaS., ClarkD. and HillanD.2014. Remanence, self‐demagnetization and their ramifications for magnetic modelling of iron oxide copper‐gold deposits: an example from Candeleria, Chile. Journal of Applied Geophysics109, 242–255.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. AydinA., FerreE.C. and AslanZ.2007. The magnetic susceptibility of granitic rocks as a proxy for geochemical composition ‐ example from the Saruhan Granitoids, Turkey. Tectonophysics441, 85–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BerubeC.L., OlivoG.R., ChouteauM., PerroutyS., ShamsipourP., EnkinR.J., et al. 2018. Predicting rock type and detecting hydrothermal alteration using machine learning and petrophysical properties of the Canadian Malartic ore and host rocks, Pontiac Subprovince, Quebec, Canada. Ore Geology Reviews96, 130–145.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BjarneS.G. and AlmqvistD.M.2017. Seismic properties and anisotropy of the continental crust: predictions based on mineral texture and rock microstructure. Reviews of Geophysics55, 367–433.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BourneB.T., DentithM.C., TrenchA. and RidleyJ.1993. Physical property variations within Archaean granite‐greenstone terrane off the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia: the influence of metamorphic grade. Exploration Geophysics24, 367–374.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BrakelA.T., MoncrieffJ.S., MuhlingP.C. and ChinR.J.1985. Dumbelyung Sheet SI 50–7. Geological Survey of Western Australia.
  9. ByrneK., LesageG., MorrisW.A., EnkinR.J., GleesonS.A. and LeeR.G.2019. Variability of outcrop magnetic susceptibility and its relationship to the porphyry Cu centers in the highland valley copper district. Ore Geology Reviews107, 201–217.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. ChristensenN.I. and MooneyW.D.1995. Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: a global view. Journal of Geophysical Research100, 9761–9788.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. ClarkD.A.1997. Magnetic petrophysics and magnetic petrology: aids to geological interpretation of magnetic surveys. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics17, 83–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. ClarkD.A.2014. Magnetic effects of hydrothermal alteration in porphyry copper and iron‐oxide copper‐gold systems: a review. Tectonophysics624–625, 46–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. DeliusH., BrewerT.S. and HarveyP.K.2003. Evidence for textural and alteration changes in basaltic lava flows using variations in rock magnetic properties (ODP Leg 183). Tectonophysics371, 111–140.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. DentithM. and MudgeS.T.2014. Geophysics for the Mineral Exploration Geoscientist. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Duzgoren‐AydinN.S., AydinA. and MalpasJ.2002. Re‐assessment of chemical weathering indices: case study on pyroclastic rocks of Hong Kong. Engineering Geology63, 99–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. EberliG.P., BaechleG.T., FlavioS. and AnselmettiF.S.2003. Factors controlling elastic properties in carbonate sediments and rocks. The Leading Edge22, 654–660.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. EmersonD.W. and MacnaeJ.2001. Further physical property data from the Archaean regolith, Western Australia. Preview92, 33–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. EnkinR.2014. The rock physical property database of British Columbia, and the distinct petrophysical signature of the chilcotin basalts. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences51, 327–338.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. EnkinR.J., CorriveauL. and HaywardN.2016. Metasomatic alteration control of petrophysical properties in the great bear magmatic zone (Northwest Territories, Canada). Economic Geology111, 2073‐2085.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Enkin, R.J.2018 “The Canadian Rock Physical Property Database: first public release”, GSC Open File8460, 60p.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. FoxP.J., SchrieberE. and PetersonJ.J.1973. The geology of the oceanic crust: compressional wave velocities of oceanic rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research78, 5155–5172.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. GrantF.S.1984a. Aeromagnetics, geology and ore environments, I. Magnetite in igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic rocks: an overview. Geoexploration23, 303–333.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. GrantF.S.1984b. Aeromagnetics, geology and ore environments, I. Magnetite and ore environments. Geoexploration23, 335–362.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. GSL1995. The description and classification of weathered rocks for engineering purposes. Geological society engineering group working party report. Quarterly Journal of engineering Geology28, 207–242.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. HargravesR.B., JohnsonD. and ChartC.Y.1991. Distribution anisotropy: the cause of AMS in igneous rocks?Geophysical Research Letters18, 2193–2196.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. HenkelH. and GuzmanM.1977. Magnetic features of fracture zones. Geoexploration15, 173–181.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. HopeM. and AnderssonS.2016. The discovery and geophysical response of the Atlántida Cu–Au porphyry deposit, Chile. Exploration Geophysics47, 237–247.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. HoschkeT.2011. Geophysical Signatures of Copper‐Gold Porphyry and Epithermal Gold Deposits, and Implications for Exploration. Hobart, Australia: University of Tasmania.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. HurichC.A., DeemerS.J., IndaresA. and SalisburyM.2001. Compositional and metamorphic controls on velocity and reflectivity in the continental crust: an example from the Grenville Province of Eastern Quebec. Journal of Geophysical ResearchB106, 665–682.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. IrvingE., MolyneuxL. and RuncornS.K.1966. The analysis of remanent intensities and susceptibilities of rocks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society10, 451–464.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. KeeleR.A.1994. Magnetic susceptibilities of rocks associated with some Archean gold deposits in Western Australia. In: Geophysical Signatures of Western Australian Mineral Deposits (eds M.C.Dentith, K.F.Francombe, S.E.Ho, J.M.Shepherd, D.I.Groves and A.Trench), pp. 315–330. Crows Nest, Australia, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicist.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. KontnyA. and DietlC.2002. Relationships between contact metamorphism and magnetite formation and destruction in a pluton's aureole, White‐Inyo Range, Eastern California. Geological Society of America Bulletin114, 1438–1451.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. LapointeP., MorrisW.A. and HardingK.L.1986. Interpretation of magnetic susceptibility: a new approach to geophysical evaluation of the degree of rock alteration. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences23, 393–401.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. LargeR.J., GemmellB., PaulickH. and HoustonD.L.2001. The alteration box plot: a simple approach to understanding the relationship between alteration mineralogy and lithogeochemistry associated with volcanic‐hosted massive sulphide deposits. Economic Geology96, 957–971.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. LarssonL.O.1977. Statistical Treatments of in‐situ Measurements of Magnetic Susceptibility. Sveriges Geologiska Undersokning, Serie C727.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. LathamA.G., HardingK.L., LapointeL., MorrisW.A. and BalchS.J.1989. On the lognormal distribution of oxides in igneous rocks, using magnetic susceptibility as a proxy for oxide mineral concentration. Geophysical Journal International96, 179–184.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. LiY., ZuoR. and YangM.2014. The relationships between magnetic susceptibility and elemental variations for mineralized rocks. Journal of Geochemical Exploration146, 17–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. McCuaigT.C. and HronskyJ.M.A.2014. The mineral system concept: the key to exploration targeting. Society of Economic Geologists Special Publication18, 153–175.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. MitchinsonD., EnkinR.J. and HartC.J.R.2014. Linking porphyry deposit geology to geophysics via physical properties: adding value to geoscience BC geophysical data. Geoscience BC Report 2013–14.
  40. MontreuilJ.‐F., CorriveauL. and PotterE.G.2015. Formation of albitite hosted uranium within IOCG systems: the Southern Breccia, great bear magmatic zone, Northwest Territories, Canada. Mineralium Deposita50, 293–325.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. MwenifumboC.J., ElliotB.E., JeffersonC.W., BerniusG.R. and PflugK.A.2004. Physical rock properties from the Athabasca group: designing geophysical exploration models for unconformity uranium deposits. Journal of Applied Geophysics55, 117–135.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. OlesenO., HenkelH., KaadaK. and TvetenE.1991. Petrophysical properties of a prograde amphibolite – granulite facies transition zone at Sigerfjord, Vesteralen, Northern Norway. Tectonophysics192, 33–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Ontario Geological Survey2001. Physical rock property data from the Matheson and Kirkland Lake areas. Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Release Data – 91.
  44. PolaA., CrostaG., FusiN., BarberiniV. and NoriniG.2012. Influence of alteration on physical properties of volcanic rocks. Tectonophysics566–567, 67–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. RauenA., SoffelH.C. and WinterH.2000. Statistical analysis and origin of the magnetic susceptibility of drill cuttings from the 9.1‐km‐deep KTB drill hole. Geophysical Journal International142, 83–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. RoachM. and FitzpatrickA.2001. Continuity and current mapping – New laboratory techniques for study of the electrical properties of sulphide rocks. SEG international Exposition and Annual meeting, San Antonio, TX, Extended Abstracts.
  47. RossP.S., BourkeA. and FresiaB.2013. A multi‐sensor logger for rock cores: methodology and preliminary results from the matagami mining camp, Canada. Ore Geology Reviews53, 93–111.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. RuotoistenmäkiT. and BirungiN.R.2015. Petrophysical database of Uganda. Journal of African Earth Sciences106, 17–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. SandrinA., EdfeltA., WaightT.E., BerggrenR. and ElmingS.‐A.2009. Physical properties and petrologic description of rock samples from an IOCG mineralized area in the northern fennoscandian shield, Sweden. Journal of Geochemical Exploration103, 80–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. SchetselaarE., BellefleurG., CravenJ., RootsE., CheraghiS., ShamsipourP.et al. 2017. Geologically Driven 3D Modelling of Physical Rock Properties in Support of Interpreting the Seismic Response of the Lalor Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Deposit, Snow Lake, Manitoba, Canada. London, UK, Geological Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. SchwarzE.1991. Magnetic expressions of intrusions including magnetic aureoles. Tectonophysics192, 191–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. SharmaR., GuptaV., AroraB.R. and SenK.2011. Petrophysical properties of the Himalayan granitoids: implication on composition and source. Tectonophysics497, 23–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. TapiaJ., TownleyB., CordovaL., PobleteF. and ArriagadaC.2016. Hydrothermal alteration and its effects on the magnetic properties of Los Pelambres, a large multistage porphyry copper deposit. Journal of Applied Geophysics132, 125–136.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Van der WielenS.E., FabrisA.J., HalleyS.W., KeelingJ.L., GordonG.A., KeepingT.et al. 2013. An exploration strategy for IOCG mineral systems under deep cover. MESA Journal71, 18–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. WendtA.S., VaughanA.P.M., FerraccioliF. and GrunovA.M.2013. Magnetic susceptibilities of rocks of the Antarctic Peninsula: implications for the redox state of the batholith and extent of metamorphic zones. Tectonophysics585, 48–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. WilliamsN.C.2009. Mass and magnetic properties of 3D geological and geophysical modelling of the southern Agnew‐Wiluna greenstone belt and leinster nickel deposits, Western Australia. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences56, 1111–1142.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. WilliamsN.C. and ChoppingR.2013.Using MineralMapper3D to Map Alteration from Hand Specimens, Downhole Data and UBC‐GIF GRAV3D/ MAG3D Inversions (Accompanies MineralMapper3D Software). Canberra, Australia, Geoscience Australia.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. WilliamsN.C. and DippleG.2007. Mapping subsurface alteration using gravity and magnetic inversion models. Proceedings of Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, pp. 461–472.
  59. WybornL.A.I., HeinrichC.A. and JaquesA.L.1994. Australian Proterozoic mineral systems: essential ingredients and mappable criteria. Proceedings of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Annual Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12882
Loading
Petrophysics and mineral exploration: a workflow for data analysis and a new interpretation framework
Geophysical Prospecting 68, 178 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12882
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12882
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12882
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Data processing; Interpretation; Petrophysics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error