1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 68, Issue 7
  5. Article
Volume 68, Issue 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We propose to adopt a deep learning based framework using generative adversarial networks for ground‐roll attenuation in land seismic data. Accounting for the non‐stationary properties of seismic data and the associated ground‐roll noise, we create training labels using local time–frequency transform and regularized non‐stationary regression. The basic idea is to train the network using a few shot gathers such that the network can learn the weights associated with noise attenuation for the training shot gathers. We then apply the learned weights to test ground‐roll attenuation on shot gathers, that are not a part of training input to obtain the desired signal. This approach gives results similar to local time–frequency transform and regularized non‐stationary regression but at a significantly reduced computational cost. The proposed approach automates the ground‐roll attenuation process without requiring any manual input in picking the parameters for each shot gather other than in the training data. Tests on field‐data examples verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

© 2020 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2020 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12985
2020-06-24
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12985
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beresford‐Smith, G. and Rango, R.N. (1988) Suppression of trapped‐wave noise on marine data. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1988, pp. 1032–1035. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Beresford‐Smith, G. and Rango, R. (1989) Suppression of ground roll by windowing in two domains. First Break, 7(2), 55–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bracewell, R.N. and Bracewell, R.N. (1986) The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, Vol. 31999. New York: McGraw‐Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, M. and Clapp, R.G. (2000) (t, x) Domain, pattern‐based ground roll removal. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2000, pp. 2103–2106. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, M. and Clapp, R.G. (2001) Seismic pattern recognition via predictive signal/noise separation. Stanford Exploration Project, pp. 177–187. Technical Report 102.
  6. Chen, Y., Jiao, S., Ma, J., Chen, H., Zhou, Y. and Gan, S. (2015) Ground‐roll noise attenuation using a simple and effective approach based on local band‐limited orthogonalization. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(11), 2316–2320.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Claerbout, J. (1983) Ground roll and radial traces. Stanford Exploration Project Report, SEP‐35, pp. 43–54.
  8. Claerbout, J.F. and Fomel, S. (2008) Image estimation by example: geophysical soundings image construction: multidimensional autoregression. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Creswell, A., White, T., Dumoulin, V., Arulkumaran, K., Sengupta, B. and Bharath, A.A. (2018) Generative adversarial networks: an overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(1), 53–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Deighan, A.J. (1997) Applications of Wavelet Transforms to the Suppression of Coherent Noise from Seismic Data in the Pre‐stack Domain. PhD Thesis, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
  11. Fomel, S. (2002) Applications of plane‐wave destruction filters. Geophysics, 67(6), 1946–1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fomel, S. (2009) Adaptive multiple subtraction using regularized nonstationary regression. Geophysics, 74(1), V25–V33.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fomel, S., Sava, P., Vlad, I., Liu, Y. and Bashkardin, V. (2013) Madagascar: open‐source software project for multidimensional data analysis and reproducible computational experiments. Journal of Open Research Software, 1(1), e8. Available at: https//doi.org/10.5334/jors.ag.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Goodfellow, I., Pouget‐Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde‐Farley, D., Ozair, S.et al. (2014) Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3, 2672–2680.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Guitton, A., Brown, M., Rickett, J. and Clapp, R. (2001) A pattern‐based technique for ground‐roll and multiple attenuation. Stanford Exploration Project, Report Sep‐108.
  16. Halliday, D., Kragh, E., Bilsby, P. and Quigley, J. (2011) Acquisition geometries for model‐driven interferometric ground‐roll removal. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011, pp. 3561–3565. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Henley, D.C. (2003) Coherent noise attenuation in the radial trace domain. Geophysics, 68(4), 1408–1416.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu, H. and Zheng, Y. (2019) Data‐driven dispersive surface‐wave prediction and mode separation using high‐resolution dispersion estimation. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 171. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103867.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiao, S., Chen, Y., Bai, M., Yang, W., Wang, E. and Gan, S. (2015) Ground roll attenuation using non‐stationary matching filtering. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 12(6), 922.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Karsli, H. and Bayrak, Y. (2008) Ground‐roll attenuation based on Wiener filtering and benefits of time‐frequency imaging. The Leading Edge, 27(2), 206–209.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaur, H., Fomel, S. and Pham, N. (2019a) Ground roll attenuation using generative adversarial network. In: 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019. Houten, The Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. pp. 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaur, H., Fomel, S. and Pham, N. (2019b) Overcoming numerical dispersion of finite‐difference wave extrapolation using deep learning. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists. pp. 2318–2322.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaur, H., Pham, N. and Fomel, S. (2019c) Estimating the inverse Hessian for amplitude correction of migrated images using deep learning. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists. pp. 2278–2282.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kaur, H., Pham, N. and Fomel, S. (2019d) Seismic data interpolation using cyclegan. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists. pp. 2202–2206.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaur, H., Pham, N. and Fomel, S. (2020) Improving resolution of migrated images by approximating the inverse Hessian using deep learning. Geophysics, 85(4), 1–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, F.‐F., Karpathy, A., and Johnson, J. (2016) CS231n: convolutional neural networks for visual recognition. Neural Networks, 1, 1. http://cs231n.stanford.edu/.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, H., Yang, W. and Yong, X. (2018) Deep learning for ground‐roll noise attenuation. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists. pp. 1981–1985.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, Y. and Fomel, S. (2013) Seismic data analysis using local time‐frequency decomposition. Geophysical Prospecting, 61(3), 516–525.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Mandelli, S., Lipari, V., Bestagini, P. and Tubaro, S. (2019) Interpolation and denoising of seismic data using convolutional neural networks. Available at: https://deepai.org/publication/interpolation-and-denoising-of-seismic-data-using-convolutional-neural-networks.
  30. McMechan, G. and Sun, R. (1991) Depth filtering of first breaks and ground roll. Geophysics, 56(3), 390–396.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Naghizadeh, M. and Sacchi, M. (2018) Ground‐roll attenuation using curvelet downscaling. Geophysics, 83(3), V185–V195.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Oliveira, D.A., Ferreira, R.S., Silva, R. and Brazil, E.V. (2018) Interpolating seismic data with conditional generative adversarial networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 99, 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliveira, D.A., Ferreira, R.S., Silva, R. and Brazil, E.V. (2019) Improving seismic data resolution with deep generative networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 16, 1929–1933.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Paszke, A., Gross, S., Chintala, S., Chanan, G., Yang, E., DeVito, Z. et al. (2017) Automatic differentiation in PyTorch. In: NIPS‐W, Long Beach, CA.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Saatcilar, R. and Canitez, N. (1988) A method of ground‐roll elimination. Geophysics, 53(7), 894–902.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Saatcilar, R. and Canitez, N. (1994) The lattice filter in ground‐roll suppression. Geophysics, 59(4), 623–631.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Shrivastava, A., Pfister, T., Tuzel, O., Susskind, J., Wang, W. and Webb, R. (2017) Learning from simulated and unsupervised images through adversarial training. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vol. 2, p. 5.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Strobbia, C., Vermeer, P., Laake, A., Glushchenko, A. and Re, S. (2010) Surface waves: processing, inversion and removal. First Break, 28(8), 85–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhu, J.‐Y., Park, T., Isola, P. and Efros, A.A. (2017) Unpaired image‐to‐image translation using cycle‐consistent adversarial networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, pp. 2242–2251.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12985
Loading
Seismic ground‐roll noise attenuation using deep learning
Geophysical Prospecting 68, 2064 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12985
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12985
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12985
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Data processing; Ground roll attenuation; Neural network

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error