1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 69, Issue 6
  5. Article
Volume 69, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Analysis of compressional and shear‐wave sonic logs in seven organic‐rich shale reservoirs exhibiting a wide range of velocities, total organic content, thermal maturity, fluid compressibility and mineral composition indicates that compressional‐wave velocity is a strong predictor of shear‐wave velocity as is the case for conventional reservoirs. Excluding data with high water saturations, a simple linear relationship is found between the compressional and shear‐wave velocities in shale reservoirs in accordance with laboratory measurements. The relationship can be further refined for prediction purposes by local calibration or with a linear correction for total organic content. Correcting for compositional variation and fluid effects requires more complex treatment. An empirical rock physics model that explicitly incorporates these effects results in high accuracy (0.2% average mean error) in shear‐wave velocity estimation for the entire data set. The model also exhibits good precision with mean absolute error of 2%. This is significantly better than what is achieved by rock physics models that do not explicitly consider fluid properties. These results are obtained without local calibration and without requiring correction for thermal maturity, degree of lithification or the shape or distribution of the solid organic matter. Explicit consideration of mineral composition, fluid substitution effects and amount of solid organic matter was necessary in this formulation to achieve this high average prediction accuracy with near zero bias as well as good precision across all formations and without local calibration. The successful use of Gassmann's equations in this algorithm suggests that errors in shear‐wave velocity prediction in shale reservoirs due to violation of the assumptions underlying these equations are either small or self‐compensating.

© 2021 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2021 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13096
2021-06-14
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13096
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Batzle, M. and Han, D. (2000) Velocity, density and modulus of hydrocarbon fluids – empirical modeling. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts.
  2. Batzle, M. and Wang, Z. (1992) Seismic properties of pore fluids. Geophysics, 57, 1396–1408.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Berryman, J.G. (1980) Long‐wavelength propagation in composite elastic media II. Ellipsoidal inclusions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 1820.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Berryman, J.G. and Milton, G.W.,(1991) Exact results for generalized Gassmann's equations in composite porous media with two constituents. Geophysics, 56, 1950–1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Castagna, J.P., Batzle, M.L. and Kan, T.K. (1993) Rock physics – the link between rock properties and AVO response. In: Castagna,J.P. and Backus, M.M. (Eds.) Offset‐Dependent Reflectivity: Theory and Practice of AVO Analysis. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Dirgantara, F., Batzle, M.L. and Curtis, J.B. (2011) “Maturity characterization and ultrasonic velocities of coals”. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2308–2312.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Gassmann, F. (1951) Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich, 96, 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Gor, G.Y. and Gurevich, B. (2018) Gassmann theory applies to nanoporous media. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 146–155.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenberg, M.L. and Castagna, J.P. (1992) Shear‐wave velocity estimation in porous rocks: theoretical formulation, preliminary verification, and applications. Geophysical Prospecting, 40, 195–209.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Grechka, V. (2009) Fluid‐solid substitution in rocks with disconnected and partially connected porosity. Geophysics, 74, WB89–WB95.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Hansen, J.A., Mondol, N.H. and Fawad, M. (2019) Organic content and maturation effects on elastic properties of source rock shales in the Central North Sea. Interpretation, 7(2), T477–T497.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill, R. (1952) The elastic behavior of a crystalline aggregate. Proceedings of the Physical Society, Section A, 65(5), 349–354.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hu, R., Vernik, L., Nayvelt, L. and Dicman, A. (2015) Seismic inversion for organic richness and fracture gradient in unconventional reservoirs: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas. The Leading Edge, 34, 80–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Iwuoha, S.C., Pedersen, P.K., Clarkson, C.R. and Gates, I.D. (2019) A working method for estimating dynamic shear velocity in the Montney formation. MethodsX, 6, 1876–1893.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Jaege, J.C., Cook, N.G.W. and Zimmerman, R.W. (2007) Fundamentals of rock mechanics 4th edition: Blackwell Publishing.
  16. Jiang, M. and Spikes, K.T. (2016) Rock‐physics and seismic‐inversion based reservoir characterization of the Haynesville Shale. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 13, 220–233.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Morcote, A., Mavko, G. and Prasad, M. (2010) Dynamic elastic properties of coal. Geophysics, 75 (6), E227–E234.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Omovie, S.J. and Castagna, J.P. (2019) P‐to‐S‐wave velocity ratio in organic shales. Geophysics, 84(6), MR205–MR222.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Passey, Q.R., Creaney, S., Kulla, J.B., Moretti, F.J. and Stroud, J.D. (1990) A practical model for organic richness from porosity and resistivity logs. AAPG Bulletin, 74, 1777–1794.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Rickman, R., Mullen, M., Petre, E., Grieser, B. and Kundert, D. (2008) Practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization – all shale plays are not clones of the Barnett shale. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 115258.
  21. Sondergeld, C.H., Newsham, K.E., Comisky, J.T., Rice, M.C. and Rai, C.S. (2010) Petrophysical Considerations in Evaluating and Producing Shale Gas Resources, 23–25. Pittsburgh: SPE‐131768‐MS, SPE Unconventional Gas Conference.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Toksöz, M.N., Cheng, C.H. and Timur, A. (1976) “Velocities of Seismic Waves in Porous Rocks”. Geophysics, 41, 621–645. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440639
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Varga, R., Lotti, R., Pachos, A., Holden, T., Marini, I., Spadafora, E. and Pendrel, J. (2012) Seismic inversion in the Barnett Shale successfully pinpoints sweet spots to optimize well‐bore placement and reduce drilling risks. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Vernik, L. (2016) Seismic Petrophysics in Quantitative Interpretation. SEG.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Vernik, L. and Kachanov, M. (2010) Modeling elastic properties of siliclastic rocks. Geophysics, 75(6), E171–E182
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Vernik, L. and Landis, C. (1996) Elastic anisotropy of source rocks: implications for hydrocarbon generation and primary migration. AAPG Bulletin, 80, 531–544.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Vernik, L., Castagna, J. and Omovie, S.J. (2018) S‐wave velocity prediction in unconventional shale reservoirs. Geophysics, 83(1), MR35–MR45.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, Z., Wang, H. and Cates, M.E. (2001) Effective elastic properties of solid clays. Geophysics, 66(2), 428–440.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Wood, A.B. (1941) A Textbook of Sound (2nd ed.): New York (MacMillan).
  30. Xu, S. and White, R.E. (1996) A new velocity model for clay‐sand mixtures. Geophysical Prospecting, 43, 91–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Yenugu, M. and Vernik, L. (2015) Constraining seismic rock‐property logs in organic shale reservoirs. The Leading Edge, 34(11), 1326–1331.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhao, L., Qin, X., Han, D.‐H., Geng, J., Yang, Z. and Cao, H. (2016) Rock‐physics modeling for the elastic properties of organic shale at different maturity stages. Geophysics, 81, D527–D541.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhao, L., Cao, C., Yao, Q., Wang, Y., Li, H., Yuan, H., et al. (2020) Gassmann consistency for different inclusion‐based effective medium theories: Implications for elastic interactions and poroelasticity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125, e2019JB018328. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018328
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13096
Loading
Estimation of shear‐wave velocities in unconventional shale reservoirs
Geophysical Prospecting 69, 1316 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13096
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13096
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13096
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Rock Physics; Shales; Shear‐wave velocity

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error