1887
Volume 29 Number 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

A three‐dimensional marine seismic survey was conducted in the Gulf of Thailand to aid in the development of a gas field indicated by three wildcat wells. The results and interpretation reported previously demonstrated improved fault resolution and better structural definition.

Five successful appraisal wells have now been drilled, and these show that most of the sands have limited extent. Widespread character changes in the seismic data also support stratigraphic variations in many of the sands.

Several new methods of 3D stratigraphic interpretation have been developed while investigating the depositional history of this area. Anomalous seismic amplitudes, tied to sands penetrated by wells and mapped from SeiscropTM horizontal sections in time and depth, have indicated the distribution of bars and channels. Horizon Seiscrop sections, each sliced through a single bed, have been used to delineate these depositional features directly. G‐LOGTM sections, displaying seismic logs derived by rigorous wave equation inversion, confirm the existence of these features. Sands greater than 10 m thick have proved mappable.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb01017.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bone, M.R.1978, A case history of 3D seismic application in the Gulf of Mexico, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper 3176, 1109–1118.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, A.R.1979, 3‐D seismic survey gives better data, Oil & Gas Journal, November 5, 57–71.
  3. Dahm, C.G. and Graebner, R.J.1979, Field development with three‐dimensional seismic methods in the Gulf of Thailand—a case history, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper 3657, 2591–2595.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dahm, C.G. and Graebner, R.J.1980, Field development with three‐dimensional seismic methods in the Gulf of Thailand—a case history, Geophysics (in preparation).
  5. French, W.S.1974, Two–dimensional and three‐dimensional migration of model‐experiment reflection profiles, Geophysics39, 265–277.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Graebner, R.J., Steel, G. and Wason, C.B.1980, Evolution of seismic technology into the 1980′s, The APEA Journal20, 110–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hautefeuille, A. and Cotton, W.R.1979, Three‐dimensional seismic surveying aids exploration in the North Sea, Oil & Gas Journal, November 5, 72–79.
  8. Johnson, J.P. and Bone, M.R.1980, Understanding field development history utilizing 3D seismic, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper 3849, 473–475.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Paul, D.D. and Lian, H.M.1975, Offshore Tertiary basins of Southeast Asia, Bay of Bengal to South China Sea, Proceedings Ninth World Petroleum Congress3, PD7 (5), 107–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Schneider, W.A.1978, Integral formulation for migration in two and three dimensions, Geophysics43, 49–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Selby, E.G.1978, Three‐dimensional data collection and processing, The APEA Journal18, 116–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tegland, E.R.1977, 3‐D seismic techniques boost field development, Oil & Gas Journal, September 12, 79–82.
  13. Widess, M.B.1973, How thin is a thin bed?, Geophysics38, 1176–1180.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Woolands, M.A. and Haw, D.1976, Tertiary stratigraphy and sedimentation in the Gulf of Thailand, SEAPEX program, Offshore South East Asia Conference (preprint).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb01017.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error