1887
Volume 29 Number 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

An analysis of amplitudes of refraction records of some shallow refraction profiles shot primarily for detailing the near‐surface structure in a granitic terrain has yielded information on refractor properties: reduced amplitudes are plotted on amplitude‐distance graphs. The negative power to which distance should be raised to represent (elastic) amplitude decay with respect to distance due to spreading of the critically refracted wave involved is examined. Computed values of this “spreading index” are close to n = 2 as predicted by the theory.

With this value of , amplitude data are processed to determine residual attenuation attributable to elastic absorption in the bedrock. A graphical approach for this purpose from comparison of amplitude‐distance graphs with the plots of amplitude decay due to spreading which is applicable to flat and horizontal refractor situations is suggested. Assuming residual attenuation to represent absorption in the granite bedrock, the computed coefficients of absorption, which vary from 0.5 to 3.90 km−1 for a frequency of 50 Hz, are obtained.

From amplitude graphs of reversed profiles it is shown that the amplitude differences plot bears a relation to lateral velocity changes in the refractor. From comparison of practical amplitude decay graphs with those computed for different subsurface models, it appears possible to detect fractured rock occurrences in the refractor.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb01018.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bandu Rao Naik, S., Nanda Kumar, G. and Vijaya Raghava, M.S.1980, The correlation refraction method as applied to weathered zone studies in a granite terrain, Geophysical Prospecting28, 18–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berzon, I.S.1951, On the determination of spreading index of refracted waves from experimental data, Izvestiya Academy of Science, USSR, Geophysics Series, no. 4 (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berzon, I.S., Epinateava, A.M., Pariskaya, G.N. and Starodubrovskaya, S.P.1962, Dynamic characteristics of seismic waves in real media, Publication of the Academy of Science, Moscow , pp. 130–134, 145–149, 286–291, 415–433, 470–481 (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradley, J.J. and Fort, N.A.Jr., 1966, Internal friction in rocks in Handbook of Physical Constants, Clark, S.P.Jr. , (Ed), Memoir97, Geological Society of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Epinateava, A.M.1959, Some results of the analysis on the refracted wave amplitude function, Transactions of the Institute of Physics of the Earth, Academy of Science, USSR, vol. 173, no. 6 (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gamburtsev, G.A., Riznichenko, Yu. V, Berzon, I.S., Epinateava, A.M., Pasechnik, I.P., Kosminskaya, I.P. and Karus, E.V.1952, The correlation refraction method, Publication of the Academy of Science, USSR (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Greychisnikov, G.A. and Nomokonov, V.P.1965, Features of refracted waves in media with a vertical layer (from modelling data), Journal of Geology and Prospecting, Izvestiya, Higher Institutions, no. 2 (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gurvich, I.I.1960, Seismic Prospecting, Gostoptexidat, Moscow , 341–348 (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gurvich, I.I.1972, Seismic Prospecting, Mir Publishers, Moscow .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Knopoff, L.1965, Attenuation of Elastic Waves in Earth, Phy. Acc. V. III, part B, Academic Press, New York .
    [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Brien, P.N.S.1957, The variation with distance of the amplitude of critically refracted waves, Geophysical Prospecting5, 300–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Brien, P.N.S.1960, The use of amplitudes in refraction shooting—A case history, Geophysical Prospecting8, 417–428.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Brien, P.N.S.1967, The use of amplitudes in seismic refraction survey in Seismic Refraction Prospecting, Musgrave, A.W. , (Ed), Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 85–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Topping, J.1971, Errors of Observation and their Treatment, Chapman and Hall, 101–109.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb01018.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error