1887
Volume 56, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Seismic tomography has been developed and applied for decades in seismological applications and for basic research purposes. During the last decade, large‐scale applications in the oil and gas industry became standard as tomostatics and velocity modelling for pre‐stack depth migration. In this paper, I take a snapshot of some current industrial applications, quantifying practical aspects by yardsticks such as data and model size and I try to draw a road map for the current decade.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00690.x
2008-06-28
2020-08-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiA. and RichardsP.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods . W.H. Freeman, San Francisco .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.2002. Quantitative Seismology , 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al‐JanoubiE., VesnaverA. and Al‐MutairiM.2004. Reflection tomographic depth conversion in Saudi Arabia. Geo 2004 meeting, Manama , Bahrain , Expanded Abstracts.
  4. BerryhillJ.R.1979. Wave equation datuming. Geophysics44, 1329–1344.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BertrandA. and MacBethC.2005. Repeatability enhancement in deep‐water permanent seismic installations: a dynamic correction for seawater velocity variations. Geophysical Prospecting53, 229–242.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BilletteF., LambaréG. and PodvinP.1997. Velocity macro‐model estimation by stereotomography. 67th SEG meeting, Dallas , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1889–1892.
  7. BiondiB.2007. Concepts and Applications in 3D Seismic Imaging . SEG. ISBN 1560801395.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BishopT.N., BubeK.P., CutlerR.T., LanganR.T., LoveP.L., ResnickJ.R., et al . 1985. Tomographic determination of velocity and depth in laterally varying media. Geophysics50, 903–923.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BöhmG., AccainoF., RossiG. and TinivellaU.2006. Tomographic joint inversion of first arrivals in a real case from Saudi Arabia. Geophysical Prospecting54, 721–730.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. BrzostowskiM.A. and McMechanG.A.2001. 3‐D Tomographic Imaging of Near‐surface Seismic Velocity and Attenuation. 3‐D Seismic Exploration . SEG. ISBN 1560800976.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. BubeK.P., LanganR.T. and NemethT.2005. Analysis of the spectral hole in velocity versus depth resolution for reflection traveltimes with limited aperture. Geophysics70, U37–U45.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. BubeK.P. and MeadowsM.A.1997. On the null space in linearized anisotropic surface reflection tomography. 67th SEG meeting, Dallas , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1677–1680.
  13. CalvertR.2005. 4D technology: Where are we, and where are we going?Geophysical Prospecting53, 161–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. CérveniV.1987. Ray tracing algorithms in three‐dimensional laterally varying layered structures. In: Seismic Tomography (ed. G.Nolet ), pp. 99–134. Reidel Publishing. ISBN 0792323254.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DasguptaS.N.2005. Arab‐D reservoir monitoring in Ghawar Field of Saudi Arabia: Alternatives to 4‐D seismic. 75th SEG meeting, Houston , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1254–1256.
  16. DeflandreJ.P., LaurentJ., MichonD. and BlondinE.1995. Microseismic surveying and repeated VSPs for monitoring an underground gas storage reservoir using permanent geophones. First Break13, 129–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. DeflandreJ.‐P., VidalS., DupinI. and HuguetF.2003. Integrated approach for reservoir management using microseismic and production monitoring. 65th EAGE meeting, Stavanger , Norway , Expanded Abstracts, D43.
  18. DraganovD., WapenaarK., ArtmanB. and BiondiB.2004. Migration methods for passive seismic data. 74th SEG meeting, Denver , Colorado , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1123–1126.
  19. FaginS.W.1998. Model‐based Depth Imaging . SEG. ISBN 1560800852.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. GaucherE., MaisonsC., FortierE. and KaiserP.2005. Fracture mapping using microseismic monitoring data recorded from treatment well – Results based on 20 hydro‐fracturing jobs. 67th EAGE meeting, Dallas , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, C008.
  21. GibsonR.L., SenaA.G. and ToksozM.N.1991. Paraxial ray tracing in 3‐D inhomogeneous, anisotropic media. Geophysical Prospecting39, 473–504.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HaleD., HillN.R. and StefaniJ.P.1991. Imaging salt with turning seismic waves. 61st SEG meeting, Houston , Teaxas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1171–1174.
  23. HampsonD. and RussellB.1984. First‐break interpretation using generalized linear inversion. 54th SEG meeting, Atlanta , Georgia , USA , Expanded Abstracts, S10.4.
  24. HanygaA. and PajchelJ.1995. Point‐to‐curve ray tracing in complicated geological models. Geophysical Prospecting43, 859–872.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. JackI.G.1997. Time‐lapse Seismic in Reservoir Management . SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. JohnstadS.E., UdenR.C. and DunlopK.N.B.1993. Seismic reservoir monitoring over the Oseberg field. First Break11, 177–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. JohnstadS.E., SeymourR.H. and SmithP.J.1995. Seismic reservoir monitoring over the Oseberg field during the period 1989–1992. First Break13, 169–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. LehmannB.2007. Seismic Traveltime Tomography for Engineering and Exploration Applications . EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. LiaoQ. and McMechanG.A.1997. Tomographic imaging of velocity and Q, with application to cross‐well seismic data from the Gypsy pilot site, Oklahoma. Geophysics62, 1804–1811.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. LoT. and InderwiesenP.1994. Fundamentals of Seismic Tomography . SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. LumleyD.2001. Time‐lapse seismic reservoir monitoring. Geophysics66, 50–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. LumleyD.E.2004. Business and technology challenges for 4D seismic reservoir monitoring. The Leading Edge23, 1166–1168.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. MacridesC. and KelamisP.2000. A 9‐C, 2‐D land seismic experiment for lithology estimation of a Permian clastic reservoir. The Leading Edge19, 1109–1116.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. NoletG.1987. Seismic Tomography . Reidel Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. OpertoS., RavautC., ImprotaL., VirieuxJ., HerreroA. and Dell'AversanaP.2004. Quantitative imaging of complex structures from dense wide‐aperture seismic data by multi‐scale traveltime and waveform inversions: a case study. Geophysical Prospecting52, 625–651.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ParkC.B., MillerR.D. and XiaJ.1999. Multi‐channel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics64, 800–808.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. ParkC., MillerR.D., LaflenD., NebC., IvanovJ., BennettB.et al . 2004. Imaging dispersion curves of passive surface waves. 74th SEG meeting, Denver , Colorado , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1357–1360.
  38. PereyraV.1996. 3‐D block travel time inversion. 66th SEG meeting, Denver , Colorado , USA , Expanded Abstracts 2023–2026.
  39. PodvinP. and LecomteI.1991. Finite difference computation of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity models. Geophysical Journal International105, 271–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. PrattR.G.1990. Inverse theory applied to multi‐source cross‐hole tomography. Part 2: Elastic wave‐equation method. Geophysical Prospecting38, 311–312.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. PrattR.G. and WorthingtonM.H.1988. The application of diffraction tomography to cross‐hole seismic data. Geophysics53, 1284–1294.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. PrattR.G. and WorthingtonM.H.1990. Inverse theory applied to multi‐source cross‐hole tomography. Part 1: Acoustic wave‐equation method. Geophysical Prospecting38, 287–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. PrattR.G., McGaugheyW.G. and ChapmanC.H.1993. Anisotropic velocity tomography: a case study in a near‐surface rock mass. Geophysics58, 1748–1763.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. QuanY. and HarrisJ.M.1997. Seismic attenuation tomography using the frequency shift method. Geophysics62, 895–905.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. RossiG., MadrussaniG. and VesnaverA.1999. Joint 3D inversion of direct, reflected and head waves for environment and engineering. 61st EAGE meeting, Helsinki , Finland , Expanded Abstracts, 4023.
  46. RossiG., Dal MoroG., MammoT., NietoD., PicottiS., VesnaverA. et al . 2001. A 3D seismic survey for groundwater protection. 71st SEG meeting, San Antonio , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1333–1336.
  47. RussellB.1988. Introduction to Seismic Inversion Methods . SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. ShapiroS.A., RothertE., RathV. and RindschwentnerJ.2002. Characterization of fluid transport properties of reservoirs using induced Microseismicity. Geophysics67, 212–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. ShapiroS.A., RentschS. and RothertE.2005. Characterization of hydraulic properties of rocks using probability of fluid‐induced micro‐earthquakes. Geophysics70, F27–F33.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Der SluisA. and Van Der VorstH.A.1987. Numerical solution of large sparse linear algebraic systems arising from tomographic problems. In: Seismic Tomography (ed. G.Nolet ), pp. 49–83. Reidel Publishing. ISBN 0792323254.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. SorokaW.L., MelvilleP., KleissE., Al‐JenaibiM., HafezH.H., ModaviA.et al . 2005. Successful pilot onshore Abu Dhabi shows that 4D can monitor fluid changes in a giant Middle East carbonate field. 75th SEG meeting, Houston , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 2430–2433.
  52. StefaniJ.P.1995. Turning‐ray tomography. Geophysics60, 1917–1929.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. StewartR.R.1991. Exploration Seismic Tomography: Fundamentals . SEG. ISBN 1560800526.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. TanerM.T., BerkhoutA.J., TreitelS. and KelamisP.G.2007. The dynamics of statics. The Leading Edge26, 396–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. ThomsenL.1995. Elastic anisotropy due to aligned cracks on porous rock. Geophysical Prospecting43, 805–829.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. ThomsenL.2002. Understanding Seismic Anisotropy in Exploration and Exploitation . SEG. ISBN 1560801123.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. VermeerG.J.O.2001. 3‐D Symmetric Sampling: 3‐D Seismic Exploration . SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. VermeerG.J.O.2004. An ambitious geometry for 3D land acquisition. The Leading Edge23, 1043–1046.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. VesnaverA.2004. The near‐surface information gap for time and depth imaging. Geophysical Prospecting52, 653–661.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. VesnaverA., BridleR., GermanJ., HuL., KimJ., LeyR.et al . 2002. Tomostatics for half a million traces. 72nd SEG meeting, Salt lake City , Utah , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 957–960.
  61. VesnaverA., AccainoF., BoehmG., MadrussaniG., PajchelJ., RossiG.et al . 2003. Time‐lapse tomography. Geophysics68, 815–823.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. VinjeV., IversenE. and GjoystdalH.1993. Traveltime and amplitude estimation using wavefront construction. Geophysics58, 1157–1166.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. WangG.Y., HarrisJ.M., MagalhaesC.G., JulanderD. and MoreaM.1998. Buena Vista Hills 3‐D attenuation and velocity tomography. 68th SEG meeting, New Orleans , Louisiana , Expanded Abstracts, 346–349.
  64. WoodwardM.J. and RoccaF.1988. Wave equation tomography. 58th SEG meeting, Anaheim , California , USA , Expanded Abstracts, S21.3.
  65. WuR.S. and ToksozM.N.1987. Diffraction tomography and multi‐source holography applied to seismic imaging. Geophysics52, 11–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. XiaJ., MillerR.D. and ParkC.B.1999. Estimation of near‐surface shear‐wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics64, 691–700.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. YilmazO.2001. Seismic Data Analysis . SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. ZhangJ. and ToksozM.N.1998. Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography. Geophysics63, 1726–1737.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. ZhangZ., LinG., ChenJ., HarrisJ.M. and HanL.2003. Inversion for elliptically anisotropic velocity using VSP reflection traveltimes. Geophysical Prospecting51, 159–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. ZhouC., CaiW., LuoY., SchusterG.R.T. and HassanzadehS.1993. High‐resolution cross‐well imaging by seismic traveltime + waveform inversion. The Leading Edge12, 988–991.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. ZhouC., SchusterG.T., HassanzadehS. and HarrisJ.M.1997. Elastic wave equation traveltime and waveform inversion of cross‐well data. Geophysics62, 853–868.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00690.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00690.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error