Next record breaking magnitude for injection induced seismicity

References

1. Bommer, J.J., Oates, S., Cepeda, J.M., Lindholm, C., Bird, J., Torres, R., Marroquín, G. and Rivas, J.
   [2006]. Control of hazard due to seismicity induced by a hot fractured rock geothermal project.Engineering Geology,83, 287–306, doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.002.
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.002 [Google Scholar]
2. Clarke, H.,Verdon, J., Kettlety, T., Baird, A. and Kendall, J.M.
   [2019]. Real time imaging, forecasting, and management of human induced seismicity at Preston New Road, Lancashire, England.Seismological Research Letters, doi: 10.1785/0220190110.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cooke, P.
   [1979]. Statistical inference for bounds of random variables.Biometrica,66 (2), 367–374, doi: 10.1093/biomet/66.2.367.
   https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/66.2.367 [Google Scholar]
4. Ellsworth, W.L.
   [2013]. Injection-Induced Earthquakes.Science,341 (6142), 1225942, doi: 10.1126/science.1225942.
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225942 [Google Scholar]
5. Grigoli, F., Cesca, S., Rinaldi, A.P., Manconi, A., López-Comino, J. A., Clinton, J.F., Westaway, R., Cauzzi, C., Dahm, T. and Wiemer, S.
   [2018]. The November 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake: A possible case of induced seismicity in South Korea.Science,360 (6392), 1003–1006, doi: 10.1126/science.aat2010.
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat2010 [Google Scholar]
6. Eaton, D.W., Davidsen, J., Pedersen, P.K. and Boroumand, N.
   [2014]. Breakdown of the Gutenberg-Richter relation for microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing: influence of stratabound fractures.Geophysical Prospecting,62: 806–818. doi: 10.1111/1365‑2478.12128.
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12128 [Google Scholar]
7. Halló, M., Opršal, I., Eisner, L. and Mohammed, Y.A.
   [2014]. Prediction of Magnitude of the Largest Potentially Induced Seismic Event.Journal of Seismology,18 (3), 421–431, doi: 10.1007/s10950‑014‑9417‑4.
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-014-9417-4 [Google Scholar]
8. Healy, J.H., Rubey, W.W., Griggs, D.T. and Raleigh, C.B.
   [1968]. The Denver earthquakes.Science,161 (3848), 1301–1310, doi: 10.1126/science.161.3848.1301.
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.161.3848.1301 [Google Scholar]
9. Interim summary report - OGA paper, 2019: https://www.ogauthority.co.uk/onshore/onshore-reports-and-data/preston-new-road-pnr-1z-hydraulic-fracturing-operations-data/, accessed on 2020/01/07
10. KNMI
    KNMI [2019]. https://www.knmi.nl/kennis-en-datacentrum/dataset/aardbevingscatalogus, last accessed on Nov 30, 2019.
11. Langenbruch, C., Dinske, C. and Shapiro, S.
    [2011]. Inter event times of fluid induced earthquakes suggest their Poisson nature.Geophysical Research Letters,38, L21302, doi: 10.1029/2011GL049474.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049474 [Google Scholar]
12. McGarr, A.
    [1976]. Seismic moments and volume changes.Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,81 (8), 1487–1494, doi: 10.1029/JB081i008p01487.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/JB081i008p01487 [Google Scholar]
13. Mendecki, A.J.
    [2016]. Mine Seismology Reference Book: Seismic Hazard, Institute of Mine Seismology. http://www.imseismology.org/imsdownloadsapp/webresources/filedownload/Mendeck-i(2016)-MSRB-Seismic-Hazard.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Shapiro, S., Dinske, C. and Langenbruch, C.
    [2010]. Seismogenic index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations.The Leading Edge,29 (3), 304–309, doi: 10.1190/1.3353727.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3353727 [Google Scholar]
15. Sintubin, M.
    [2018]. The Groningen Case: When science becomes part of the problem, not the solution.Seismological Research Letters,89 (6), 2001–2007, doi: 10.1785/0220180203.
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180203 [Google Scholar]
16. Suckale, J.
    [2010]. Moderate-to-large seismicity induced by hydrocarbon production.The Leading Edge,29 (3), 310–319, doi: 10.1190/1.3353728.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3353728 [Google Scholar]
17. Tata, M.N.
    [1969]. On outstanding values in a sequence of random variables.Probability Theory and Related Fields,12 (1), 9–20, doi:10.1007/BF00538520.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00538520 [Google Scholar]
18. Urban, P., Lasocki, S., Blascheck, P, do Nascimento, A.F., Van Giang, N. and Kwiatek, G.
    [2016]. Violations of Gutenberg-Richter Relation in Anthropogenic Seismicity.Pure and Applied Geophysics,173, 5,1517–1537. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1188-5.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Verdon, J.P and Budge, J.
    [2018]. Examining the capability of statistical models to mitigate induced seismicity during hydraulic fracturing of shale gas reservoirs.Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,108, 690–701, doi: 10.1785/0120170207.
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170207 [Google Scholar]
20. Vlek, C.
    [2019]. The Groningen Gasquakes: Foreseeable Surprises, Complications of Hard Science, and the Search for Effective Risk Communication.Seismological Research Letters,90 (3), 1071–1077, doi: 10.1785/0220180368.
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180368 [Google Scholar]
21. Zöller, G. and Holschneider, M.
    [2016]. The maximum possible and the maximum expected earthquake magnitude for production-induced earthquakes at the gas field in Groningen, The Netherlands.Bull. Seismol Soc. Am.,106 (6), 2917–2921, doi: 10.1785/0120160220.
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160220 [Google Scholar]