Volume 38 Number 2
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
Preview this article:
Zoom in

Next record breaking magnitude for injection induced seismicity, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/fb/38/2/fb2020010-1.gif

There is no abstract available for this article.
Use the preview function to the left.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bommer, J.J., Oates, S., Cepeda, J.M., Lindholm, C., Bird, J., Torres, R., Marroquín, G. and Rivas, J.
    [2006]. Control of hazard due to seismicity induced by a hot fractured rock geothermal project.Engineering Geology,83, 287–306, doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.002.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Clarke, H.,Verdon, J., Kettlety, T., Baird, A. and Kendall, J.M.
    [2019]. Real time imaging, forecasting, and management of human induced seismicity at Preston New Road, Lancashire, England.Seismological Research Letters, doi: 10.1785/0220190110.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooke, P.
    [1979]. Statistical inference for bounds of random variables.Biometrica,66 (2), 367–374, doi: 10.1093/biomet/66.2.367.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/66.2.367 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellsworth, W.L.
    [2013]. Injection-Induced Earthquakes.Science,341 (6142), 1225942, doi: 10.1126/science.1225942.
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225942 [Google Scholar]
  5. Grigoli, F., Cesca, S., Rinaldi, A.P., Manconi, A., López-Comino, J. A., Clinton, J.F., Westaway, R., Cauzzi, C., Dahm, T. and Wiemer, S.
    [2018]. The November 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake: A possible case of induced seismicity in South Korea.Science,360 (6392), 1003–1006, doi: 10.1126/science.aat2010.
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat2010 [Google Scholar]
  6. Eaton, D.W., Davidsen, J., Pedersen, P.K. and Boroumand, N.
    [2014]. Breakdown of the Gutenberg-Richter relation for microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing: influence of stratabound fractures.Geophysical Prospecting,62: 806–818. doi: 10.1111/1365‑2478.12128.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12128 [Google Scholar]
  7. Halló, M., Opršal, I., Eisner, L. and Mohammed, Y.A.
    [2014]. Prediction of Magnitude of the Largest Potentially Induced Seismic Event.Journal of Seismology,18 (3), 421–431, doi: 10.1007/s10950‑014‑9417‑4.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-014-9417-4 [Google Scholar]
  8. Healy, J.H., Rubey, W.W., Griggs, D.T. and Raleigh, C.B.
    [1968]. The Denver earthquakes.Science,161 (3848), 1301–1310, doi: 10.1126/science.161.3848.1301.
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.161.3848.1301 [Google Scholar]
  9. Interim summary report - OGA paper, 2019: https://www.ogauthority.co.uk/onshore/onshore-reports-and-data/preston-new-road-pnr-1z-hydraulic-fracturing-operations-data/, accessed on 2020/01/07
  10. KNMI
    KNMI [2019]. https://www.knmi.nl/kennis-en-datacentrum/dataset/aardbevingscatalogus, last accessed on Nov 30, 2019.
  11. Langenbruch, C., Dinske, C. and Shapiro, S.
    [2011]. Inter event times of fluid induced earthquakes suggest their Poisson nature.Geophysical Research Letters,38, L21302, doi: 10.1029/2011GL049474.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049474 [Google Scholar]
  12. McGarr, A.
    [1976]. Seismic moments and volume changes.Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,81 (8), 1487–1494, doi: 10.1029/JB081i008p01487.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/JB081i008p01487 [Google Scholar]
  13. Mendecki, A.J.
    [2016]. Mine Seismology Reference Book: Seismic Hazard, Institute of Mine Seismology. http://www.imseismology.org/imsdownloadsapp/webresources/filedownload/Mendeck-i(2016)-MSRB-Seismic-Hazard.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Shapiro, S., Dinske, C. and Langenbruch, C.
    [2010]. Seismogenic index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations.The Leading Edge,29 (3), 304–309, doi: 10.1190/1.3353727.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3353727 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sintubin, M.
    [2018]. The Groningen Case: When science becomes part of the problem, not the solution.Seismological Research Letters,89 (6), 2001–2007, doi: 10.1785/0220180203.
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180203 [Google Scholar]
  16. Suckale, J.
    [2010]. Moderate-to-large seismicity induced by hydrocarbon production.The Leading Edge,29 (3), 310–319, doi: 10.1190/1.3353728.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3353728 [Google Scholar]
  17. Tata, M.N.
    [1969]. On outstanding values in a sequence of random variables.Probability Theory and Related Fields,12 (1), 9–20, doi:10.1007/BF00538520.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00538520 [Google Scholar]
  18. Urban, P., Lasocki, S., Blascheck, P, do Nascimento, A.F., Van Giang, N. and Kwiatek, G.
    [2016]. Violations of Gutenberg-Richter Relation in Anthropogenic Seismicity.Pure and Applied Geophysics,173, 5,1517–1537. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1188-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Verdon, J.P and Budge, J.
    [2018]. Examining the capability of statistical models to mitigate induced seismicity during hydraulic fracturing of shale gas reservoirs.Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,108, 690–701, doi: 10.1785/0120170207.
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170207 [Google Scholar]
  20. Vlek, C.
    [2019]. The Groningen Gasquakes: Foreseeable Surprises, Complications of Hard Science, and the Search for Effective Risk Communication.Seismological Research Letters,90 (3), 1071–1077, doi: 10.1785/0220180368.
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180368 [Google Scholar]
  21. Zöller, G. and Holschneider, M.
    [2016]. The maximum possible and the maximum expected earthquake magnitude for production-induced earthquakes at the gas field in Groningen, The Netherlands.Bull. Seismol Soc. Am.,106 (6), 2917–2921, doi: 10.1785/0120160220.
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160220 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error