Seismic Acquisition in Western Siberia: a Comparison Between Conventional Cabled Receiver Arrays and Lightweight Autonomous Nodes

References

1. Adamovich, O., and L’Heureux, E.
   [2020]. Building a geological model for synthetic seismic data in an area of complex surface volcanics, SEG Technical Program:90th Annual International Meeting, Extended Abstracts: 2653–2657. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2020-3428206.1.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adamovich, O.
   [2020]. Impact of seismic acquisition design and trace density on resolution and pre-stack attributes: a 3D case study in Western Siberia, BP Internal Report.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ait-Messaoud, M., Boulegroun, M.Z., Gribi, A., Kasmi, R., Touami, M., Anderson, B., Van Baaren, P., El-Emam, A., Rached, G., Laake, A. and Pickering, S.
   , [2005]. New dimensions in land seismic technology.Oilfield Review, 17(3), 42–53.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alexander, G., Johnson, N., Jackson, Z., Riseman, S., Johnson, G. and Ruckel, D.
   [2017]. The impact of increased data density on a land processing workflow. SEG Technical Program:87th Annual International Meeting, Extended Abstracts, 216–220, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17664341.1.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baeten, G.J.M., Belougne, V., Combee, L., Kragh, E., Laake, A., Martin, J.E., Orban, J., Özbek, A., and Vermeer, P.L.
   [2000]. Acquisition and processing of point receiver measurements in land seismic.SEG Technical Program: 70th Annual International Meeting, Extended Abstracts, 41–44.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brooks, C., Ourabah, A., Crosby, A., Manning, T., Naranjo, J., Ablyazina, D., Zhuzhel, V. , Holst, E. and Husom, V.
   [2018]. 3D field trial using a new nimble node: West Siberia, Russia.SEG Technical Program: 88th Annual International Meeting, Extended Abstracts, 6–10, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2995441.1.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Crosby, A., Manning, T., Ourabah, A., Brooks, C., Dieulangard, D., Quigley, J., Vasile, C. and Ablyazina, D.
   [2020]. In-field quality control of very high channel count autonomous nodal systems.SEG Technical Program: 90th Annual International Meeting, Extended Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2020-3425467.1.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Crosby, A., Dieulangard, D., Ourabah, A., Brooks, C., Manning, T., Quigley, J., O’Connell, Vasile, C. and Ablyazina, D.
   [2021]. Efficient Clock Drift Corrections and Self-Surveys for Nimble Nodes.82nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202010882.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cooper, N.
   [2002]. Seismic instruments — What’s new? … And what’s true?CSEG Recorder, 27(10).
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dean, T., Tulett, J. and Barnwell, R.
    [2018]. Nodal land seismic acquisition: The next generation.First Break, 36, 47–5.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Manning, T., Brooks, C., Ourabah, A., Crosby, A., Popham, M., Ablyazina, D., Zhuzhel, V., Holst, E. and Goujon, N.
    [2018]. The case for a nimble node, towards a new land seismic receiver system with unlimited channels.SEG Technical Program: 88th Annual International Meeting, Extended Abstracts, 21–25.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Manning, T., Ablyazina, D. and Quigley, J.
    [2019]. The nimble node — Million-channel land recording systems have arrived.The Leading Edge, September, 706–714, https://doi.org/10.1190/tle38090706.1.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Manning, T., Stone, J., Ourabah, A., Ablyazina, D. and Quigley, J.
    [2019]. Could You Use One Million Nimble Node Channels?81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901137.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Naranjo, J., Dieulangard, D. and Pfister, M.
    [2019]. Using Carpet Geometries in Simultaneous Source Acquisition.81st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901405.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Naranjo, J., Gurentsov, N., Tverdokhlebov, D., Adamovich, O. and Melnikov, R.
    [2020]. Designing High Density Land Acquisition Surveys in Complex Environments; A Case Study from East Siberia, Russia.82nd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202010677.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ourabah, A., Bradley, J., Hance, T., Kowalczyk-Kedzierska, M., Grimshaw, M. and Murray, E.
    [2015a]. Impact of acquisition geometry on AVO/AVOA attributes quality — A decimation study onshore Jordan:77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201413301.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ourabah, A., Keggin, J., Brooks, C., Ellis, D. and Etgen, J.
    [2015b]. Seismic acquisition, what really matters?, SEG Technical Program:85th Annual International Meeting, Extended abstracts, 6–11, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2015-5844787.1.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ourabah, A., Crosby, A., Brooks, C., Manning, E., Lythgoe, K., Ablyazina, D., Zhuzhel, V., Holst, E. and Knutsen, T.
    [2019]. A Comparative Field Trial of a New Nimble Node and Cabled Systems in a Desert Environment, 81st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901136.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ourabah, A. and Crosby, A.
    [2020]. A 184 million traces per km2 seismic survey with nodes - acquisition and processing, SEG Technical Program: 90th Annual International Meeting, Extended Abstracts, 41–45,https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2020-3426358.1.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Quigley, J.
    [2004]. An integrated 3D acquisition and processing technique using point sources and point receivers.SEG Technical Program: 74th Annual International Meeting, Extended Abstracts, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1839677.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Regone, C., Fry, M. and Etgen, J.
    [2015]. Dense Sources vs. Dense Receivers in the Presence of Coherent Noise: A Land Modeling Study, SEG Technical Program: 85th Annual International Meeting, Extended Abstracts, 12–16, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2015-5833924.1.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Tellier, N., Laroche, S., Wang, H. and Herrmann, P.
    [2021]. Single-sensor acquisition without data jitter: a comparative sensor study.First Break, 39(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021007.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Tillotson, P., Davies, D., Ball, M. and Smith, L.
    [2019]. Clair ridge: Learnings from processing the densest OBN survey in the UKCS.81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901182.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Tverdokhlebov, D., Arutyuniants, I., Danko, E., Gayduk, A., Ablyazina, D., Melnikov, R., Adamovich, O., Naranjo, J. and Ourabah, A.
    [2019]. Processing and analysis results of the first 3D nimble node survey; West Siberia, Russia.81st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901179.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Vermeer, G.J.
    [2012]. 3D Seismic Survey Design, Second Edition. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Yanchak, D., Monk, D. and Versfelt, J.
    [2018]. Egypt West Kalabsha 3D broadband ultrahigh density seismic survey.SEG Technical Program: 88th Annual International Meeting, Extended Abstracts, 4080–4084, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2997973.1.
    [Google Scholar]