1887
Volume 40 Number 1
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Fundamental Noise — the Key to Recovering Your Signal: an Integrated Workflow for Seismic Survey Design, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/fb/40/1/fb2022008-1.gif

There is no abstract available for this article.
Use the preview function to the left.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022008
2022-01-01
2022-01-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dean, T. and Al Hasani, M.A.
    [2020]. Seismic noise in an urban environment.The Leading Edge, 39(9), pp.639–645.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dean, T., Tulett, J. and Barnwell, R.
    [2018]. Nodal land seismic acquisition: The next generation.First Break, 36, 47–52. 10.3997/1365‑2397.n0061.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.n0061 [Google Scholar]
  3. Harrison, D., Eller, M. and Cave, N.
    [2013]. 3D Seismic Acquisition in the Modern Battlefield – Innovative Use of Technology to Reduce Safety Risks.Conference Proceedings, 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013, Jun 2013, cp-348-00762.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaplan, S.T., Sacchi, M.D. and Ulrych, T.J.
    [2009]. Sparse coding for data-driven coherent and incoherent noise attenuation. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009 (pp. 3327–3331). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumar, V. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2009]. Incoherent noise suppression with curvelet-domain sparsity. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009 (pp. 3356–3360). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Laake, A. and Cutts, A
    [2007]. The role of remote sensing data in near-surface seismic characterization.First Break, 25.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Laake, A. and Insley, M.
    [2004]. Applications of satellite imagery to seismic survey design.The Leading Edge, 23, 1062–1064.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Regone, C.J.
    [1998]. Suppression of coherent noise in 3-D seismology.The Leading Edge, 17(11), pp.1584–1589.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Strobbia, C., Vermeer, P., Laake, A., Glushchenko, A. and Re, S.
    [2010]. Surface waves: processing, inversion and removal.First Break, 28(8).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Strobbia, C.L., Laake, A., Vermeer, P.L. and Glushchenko, A.
    [2009]. June. Surface waves–Use them then lose them. In 71st EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2009 (pp. cp-127). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Strobbia, C., Ourabah, A., Bos, S. and Gallego, P.
    [2021]. October. Will the New Seismic Technology Shake the Geothermal Industry? In 82nd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition (Vol. 2021, No. 1, pp. 1–5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sweeney, D., Dean, T., Strobbia, C., Hughes, J. and Bayly, M.
    Onshore seismic acquisition: out with the old in with new AEGC2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Vermeer, G.
    [1998]. 3-D symmetric sampling.Geophyscis 63(5).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022008
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error