1887
Volume 2 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Tomographic data processed by 2D inversion programs can produce fairly large distortions due to incorrect source and/or detector positions. This problem is very serious in high‐frequency electromagnetic tomography (GPR), due to the dimensions of the transmitter and receiver antennae. The errors can even be larger when coupled antennae are used (receiver and transmitter inside the same box) whose positions are not clearly known. Similar errors can be involved in seismic tomography, for instance when the mechanical connection between transducers and sample is defective.

In this paper the problem has been studied using synthetic data which were calculated for different acquisition geometries. Synthetic data have been distorted assuming a position error in the whole set of sensors, transmitters or receivers. Tests have been carried out using a homogeneous, isotropic medium and various simple inhomogeneous models, characterized by different geometric boundaries.

The responses for all the models have been calculated (both forward and inverse problems) assuming straight raypaths, also in the case of velocity variations. The calculated traveltimes were processed using an LSQR algorithm implemented in an iterative inversion program, containing two damping factors to reduce total and local velocity contrasts. The inversion results have been reproduced graphically and the analysis of residuals has been carried out. Finally, propagation of these residuals, both in time and velocity, is discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004008
2004-03-01
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CardarelliE.1997. Un’applicazione di tomografia sismica 3D e 2D su campioni di pannelli murari. Materiali e strutture, problemi di conservazione. “L’erma” di Bretscheneider, VII, 2, 1:131–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CosentinoP., MartoranaR., MiragliaD., SanfratelloV. and Terra‐novaL.M.2000. Seismic and GPR tomographies on a marble column. Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of EEGS, European Section, Bochum, CH07.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MenkeW.1984. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. Academic Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. PaigeC.C. and SaundersA.M.1982. LSQR: an algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software8, 43–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SanfratelloV.2002. Analisi degli errori e loro propagazione nella tomografia per trasparenza con campi d’onda. Metodi di dis‐cretizzazione ed ottimizzazione di tecniche di ricostruzione tomografica. PhD thesis, University of Palermo, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. TarantolaA.1987. Inverse Problem Theory Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Elsevier Science Publishin Co.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004008
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error